Literature DB >> 25921078

Outcomes with OAE and AABR screening in the first 48 h--Implications for newborn hearing screening in developing countries.

Michelle van Dyk1, De Wet Swanepoel2, James W Hall3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Early discharge of newborns (<24h after birth) from birthing centres is an important barrier to successful newborn hearing screening (NHS) in developing countries. This study evaluated the outcome of NHS within the first 48 h using an automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) device without the need for costly disposables typically required, and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE).
METHODS: NHS was performed on 150 healthy newborns (300 ears) with TEOAE and AABR techniques before discharge at a hospital. A three-stage screening protocol was implemented consisting of an initial screen with TEOAE (GSI AUDIOscreener+) and AABR (BERAphone(®) MB 11). Infants were screened at several time points as early as possible after birth. Infants were only re-screened if either screening technique (TEOAE or AABR) initially yielded a refer outcome. The same audiologist performed all TEOAE and AABR screenings.
RESULTS: Over the three-stage screen AABR had a significantly lower refer rate of 16.7% (24/144 subjects) compared to TEOAE (37.9%; 55/145 subjects). Screening refer rate showed a progressive decrease with increasing age. For both TEOAE and AABR, refer rate per ear screened 24h post birth was significantly lower than for those screened before 24h. For infants screened before 12h post birth, the AABR refer rate per ear (51.1%) was significantly lower than the TEOAE refer rate (68.9%). Overall AABR refer rate per ear was similar for infants screened between 24 to 36 h (20.2%) and 36 to 48 h (18.9%) but significantly lower than for TEOAE (40.7% and 41.9%, respectively). Lowest initial refer rates per ear (TEOAE 25.8%, AABR 3.2%) were obtained after 48 h post birth.
CONCLUSION: In light of the early post birth discharge typical in developing countries like South Africa, in-hospital screening with AABR technology is significantly more effective than TEOAEs. AABR screening with a device like the MB 11 is particularly appropriate because disposable costs are negligible.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age at screen; Automated auditory brainstem response; Developing countries; Early intervention; Newborn hearing screening; Otoacoustic emissions

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25921078     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  6 in total

1.  UNHS: A Decade Long Feasibility and Sustenance Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital in India.

Authors:  Melanie Kapadia; Neelam Vaid; Varada Vaze
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-02-23

2.  Universal newborn hearing screening with automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) in Hungary: 5-year experience in diagnostics and influence on the early intervention.

Authors:  Anita Gáborján; Gábor Katona; Miklós Szabó; Béla Muzsik; Marianna Küstel; Mihály Horváth; László Tamás
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.236

3.  Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China.

Authors:  Haibin Sheng; Qian Zhou; Qixuan Wang; Yun Yu; Lihua Liu; Meie Liang; Xueyan Zhou; Hao Wu; Xiangrong Tang; Zhiwu Huang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.418

4.  Communication and school readiness abilities of children with hearing impairment in South Africa: A retrospective review of early intervention preschool records.

Authors:  Ntsako P Maluleke; Katijah Khoza-Shangase; Amisha Kanji
Journal:  S Afr J Commun Disord       Date:  2019-02-28

5.  Feasibility of newborn hearing screening in a public hospital setting in South Africa: A pilot study.

Authors:  Amisha Kanji; Katijah Khoza-Shangase
Journal:  S Afr J Commun Disord       Date:  2016-07-21

6.  Outcomes of Automated Auditory Evoked Potential Performed in Different Settings and the Factors Associated with Referred Cases.

Authors:  Daniela Polo Camargo da Silva; Georgea Espíndola Ribeiro; Gustavo Leão Castilho; Jair Cortez Mantovani
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.