Literature DB >> 25921036

Comparative analysis of first-year fingolimod and natalizumab drug discontinuation among Swedish patients with multiple sclerosis.

T Frisell1, L Forsberg2, N Nordin2, C Kiesel2, L Alfredsson3, J Askling4, J Hillert2, T Olsson2, F Piehl2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Natalizumab (NTZ) and fingolimod (FGL) are mainly used second line in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), although pivotal trials included mainly treatment-naïve patients.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to provide real-world data on safety and discontinuation rates.
METHODS: Using IMSE, a drug monitoring registry for all newer MS drugs in Sweden, we analysed differences in baseline characteristics and 1-year drug survival for patients registered 2011-2013, initiating treatment with NTZ (n=640) or FGL (n=876). Among FGL initiators, n=383 (44%) had previously used NTZ (FGL(afterNTZ)).
RESULTS: Compared with NTZ, the FGL cohort was older and more often male (36/38 years, 24%/33% males). Baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale was similar across groups, but MS Severity Score was higher in NTZ patients, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test and MS Impact Scale (MSIS-29) was higher in FGL(afterNTZ) versus FGL(NTZ-naïve) patients. Proportion on drug after 1 year was high, NTZ=87%, FGL(NTZ-naïve)=83% and FGL(afterNTZ)=76%. Adverse events was the most frequent reason for discontinuing FGL (FGL(NTZ-naïve)=9%, FGL(afterNTZ)=12%), and was significantly higher than on NTZ (3%). In contrast, the proportion of patients stopping treatment due to lack of effect was more similar: NTZ=4%, FGL(NTZ-naïve)=3%, FGL(afterNTZ)=8%.
CONCLUSION: FGL and NTZ were both well tolerated, but FGL less so than NTZ, especially in patients switching to FGL from NTZ. Group differences were not explained by differences in recorded baseline characteristics.
© The Author(s), 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multiple sclerosis; drug survival; fingolimod; health services research; natalizumab; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25921036     DOI: 10.1177/1352458515579216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler        ISSN: 1352-4585            Impact factor:   6.312


  17 in total

Review 1.  Treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis - insights from real-world observational studies.

Authors:  Maria Trojano; Mar Tintore; Xavier Montalban; Jan Hillert; Tomas Kalincik; Pietro Iaffaldano; Tim Spelman; Maria Pia Sormani; Helmut Butzkueven
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Comparative Effectiveness of Rituximab and Other Initial Treatment Choices for Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Mathias Granqvist; Malin Boremalm; Amyar Poorghobad; Anders Svenningsson; Jonatan Salzer; Thomas Frisell; Fredrik Piehl
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 18.302

Review 3.  [Real-world evidence : Benefits and limitations in multiple sclerosis research].

Authors:  T Ziemssen; D Rothenbacher; J Kuhle; T Berger
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.214

4.  Effectiveness and baseline factors associated to fingolimod response in a real-world study on multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  F Esposito; L Ferrè; F Clarelli; M A Rocca; G Sferruzza; L Storelli; M Radaelli; F Sangalli; L Moiola; B Colombo; F Martinelli Boneschi; G Comi; M Filippi; V Martinelli
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Effectiveness of Fingolimod versus Natalizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Spain: Second-Line GATE Study.

Authors:  José Meca-Lallana; Teresa Ayuso; Sergio Martínez-Yelamos; Carmen Durán; Yessica Contreras Martín; Nicolás Herrera Navarro; Angel Pérez Sempere; Jose C Álvarez-Cermeño; Jorge Millán Pascual; Virginia Meca-Lallana; Raúl Romero Sevilla; Javier Ricart
Journal:  Eur Neurol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 1.710

6.  Long-term real-world effectiveness and safety of fingolimod over 5 years in Germany.

Authors:  Tjalf Ziemssen; Michael Lang; Stephan Schmidt; Holger Albrecht; Luisa Klotz; Judith Haas; Christoph Lassek; Stefan Lang; Veronika E Winkelmann; Benjamin Ettle; Ulf Schulze-Topphoff
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 6.682

7.  Long-Term Effectiveness, Safety and Tolerability of Fingolimod in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in Real-World Treatment Settings in France: The VIRGILE Study.

Authors:  Caroline Papeix; Giovanni Castelnovo; Emmanuelle Leray; Marc Coustans; Pierre Levy; Jean-Marc Visy; Gisela Kobelt; Fabienne Lamy; Bashar Allaf; François Heintzmann; Isabelle Chouette; Eric Raponi; Barbara Durand; Emmanuelle Grevat; Driss Kamar; Marc Debouverie; Christine Lebrun-Frenay
Journal:  Neurol Ther       Date:  2022-02-11

8.  The importance of collecting structured clinical information on multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Tjalf Ziemssen; Jan Hillert; Helmut Butzkueven
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Rituximab in multiple sclerosis: A retrospective observational study on safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Jonatan Salzer; Rasmus Svenningsson; Peter Alping; Lenka Novakova; Anna Björck; Katharina Fink; Protik Islam-Jakobsson; Clas Malmeström; Markus Axelsson; Mattias Vågberg; Peter Sundström; Jan Lycke; Fredrik Piehl; Anders Svenningsson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  The Efficacy of Natalizumab versus Fingolimod for Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review, Indirect Evidence from Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials and Meta-Analysis of Observational Head-to-Head Trials.

Authors:  Georgios Tsivgoulis; Aristeidis H Katsanos; Dimitris Mavridis; Nikolaos Grigoriadis; Efthymios Dardiotis; Ioannis Heliopoulos; Panagiotis Papathanasopoulos; Theodoros Karapanayiotides; Constantinos Kilidireas; Georgios M Hadjigeorgiou; Konstantinos Voumvourakis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.