Fabio Campanella1, Franco Fabbro1, Tamara Ius1, Tim Shallice1, Miran Skrap1. 1. Neurosurgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Udine, Italy (F.C., T.I., M.S.); Department of Human Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy (F.F.); Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico 'E. Medea', Polo Regionale Friuli Venezia Giulia, Pordenone, Italy (F.F.); Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College, London, England (T.S.); Cognitive Neuroscience Sector, International School for Advanced Studies SISSA-ISAS, Trieste, Italy (T.S.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cognitive effects of brain surgery for the removal of intracranial tumors are still under investigation. For many basic sensory/motor or language-based functions, focal, albeit transient, cognitive deficits have been reported low-grade gliomas (LGGs); however, the effects of surgery on higher-level cognitive functions are still largely unknown. It has recently been shown that, following brain tumors, damage to different brain regions causes a variety of deficits at different levels in the perception and interpretation of emotions and intentions. However, the effects of different tumor histologies and, more importantly, the effects of surgery on these functions have not been examined. METHODS: The performance of 66 patients affected by high-grade glioma (HGG), LGG, and meningioma on 4 tasks tapping different levels of perception and interpretations of emotion and intentions was assessed before, immediately after, and (for LGG patients) 4 months following surgery. RESULTS: Results showed that HGG patients were generally already impaired in the more perceptual tasks before surgery and did not show surgery effects. Conversely, LGG patients, who were unimpaired before surgery, showed a significant deficit in perceptual tasks immediately after surgery that was recovered within few months. Meningioma patients were substantially unimpaired in all tasks. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that surgery can be relatively safe for LGG patients with regard to the higher-level, more complex cognitive functions and can provide further useful information to the neurosurgeon and improve communication with both the patient and the relatives about possible changes that can occur immediately after surgery.
BACKGROUND: Cognitive effects of brain surgery for the removal of intracranial tumors are still under investigation. For many basic sensory/motor or language-based functions, focal, albeit transient, cognitive deficits have been reported low-grade gliomas (LGGs); however, the effects of surgery on higher-level cognitive functions are still largely unknown. It has recently been shown that, following brain tumors, damage to different brain regions causes a variety of deficits at different levels in the perception and interpretation of emotions and intentions. However, the effects of different tumor histologies and, more importantly, the effects of surgery on these functions have not been examined. METHODS: The performance of 66 patients affected by high-grade glioma (HGG), LGG, and meningioma on 4 tasks tapping different levels of perception and interpretations of emotion and intentions was assessed before, immediately after, and (for LGG patients) 4 months following surgery. RESULTS: Results showed that HGG patients were generally already impaired in the more perceptual tasks before surgery and did not show surgery effects. Conversely, LGG patients, who were unimpaired before surgery, showed a significant deficit in perceptual tasks immediately after surgery that was recovered within few months. Meningiomapatients were substantially unimpaired in all tasks. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that surgery can be relatively safe for LGG patients with regard to the higher-level, more complex cognitive functions and can provide further useful information to the neurosurgeon and improve communication with both the patient and the relatives about possible changes that can occur immediately after surgery.
Authors: H Duffau; L Capelle; D Denvil; N Sichez; P Gatignol; M Lopes; M-C Mitchell; J-P Sichez; R Van Effenterre Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: S W Atlas; R S Howard; J Maldjian; D Alsop; J A Detre; J Listerud; M D'Esposito; K D Judy; E Zager; M Stecker Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 1996-02 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: A Krainik; S Lehéricy; H Duffau; L Capelle; H Chainay; P Cornu; L Cohen; A-L Boch; J-F Mangin; D Le Bihan; C Marsault Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-02-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Oliver Tucha; Christian Smely; Michael Preier; Georg Becker; Geraldine M Paul; Klaus W Lange Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Elias Konrath; Franz Marhold; Wolfgang Kindler; Florian Scheichel; Branko Popadic; Katrin Blauensteiner; Bernadette Calabek; Elisabeth Freydl; Michael Weber; Robin Ristl; Katharina Hainz; Camillo Sherif; Stefan Oberndorfer Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 2.903
Authors: Justin Choon Hwee Ng; Angela An Qi See; Ting Yao Ang; Lysia Yan Rong Tan; Beng Ti Ang; Nicolas Kon Kam King Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Eef J Hendriks; Esther J J Habets; Martin J B Taphoorn; Linda Douw; Aeilko H Zwinderman; W Peter Vandertop; Frederik Barkhof; Martin Klein; Philip C De Witt Hamer Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2018-01-29 Impact factor: 5.038