Literature DB >> 25920911

Do surgical care bundles reduce the risk of surgical site infections in patients undergoing colorectal surgery? A systematic review and cohort meta-analysis of 8,515 patients.

Judith Tanner1, Wendy Padley2, Ojan Assadian3, David Leaper3, Martin Kiernan4, Charles Edmiston5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Care bundles are a strategy that can be used to reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI), but individual studies of care bundles report conflicting outcomes. This study assesses the effectiveness of care bundles to reduce SSI among patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, and cohort studies of care bundles to reduce SSI. The search strategy included database and clinical trials register searches from 2012 until June 2014, searching reference lists of retrieved studies and contacting study authors to obtain missing data. The Downs and Black checklist was used to assess the quality of all studies. Raw data were used to calculate pooled relative risk (RR) estimates using Cochrane Review Manager. The I(2) statistic and funnel plots were performed to identify publication bias. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to examine the influence of individual data sets on pooled RRs.
RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included in the analysis, with 13 providing sufficient data for a meta-analysis. Most study bundles included core interventions such as antibiotic administration, appropriate hair removal, glycemic control, and normothermia. The SSI rate in the bundle group was 7.0% (328/4,649) compared with 15.1% (585/3,866) in a standard care group. The pooled effect of 13 studies with a total sample of 8,515 patients shows that surgical care bundles have a clinically important impact on reducing the risk of SSI compared to standard care with a CI of 0.55 (0.39-0.77; P = .0005).
CONCLUSION: The systematic review and meta-analysis documents that use of an evidence-based, surgical care bundle in patients undergoing colorectal surgery significantly reduced the risk of SSI.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25920911     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  48 in total

1.  Phase II Randomized Trial of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy to Decrease Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Laparotomy for Gastrointestinal, Pancreatic, and Peritoneal Surface Malignancies.

Authors:  Perry Shen; Aaron U Blackham; Stacey Lewis; Clancy J Clark; Russell Howerton; Harveshp D Mogal; Rebecca M Dodson; Gregory B Russell; Edward A Levine
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Surgical site infection reduction bundle in patients with gynecologic cancer undergoing colon surgery.

Authors:  Maria B Schiavone; Lea Moukarzel; Kam Leong; Qin C Zhou; Anoushka M Afonso; Alexia Iasonos; Kara Long Roche; Mario M Leitao; Dennis S Chi; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Oliver Zivanovic
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Closed Abdominal Incisions: A Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Cameron I Wells; Chathura B B Ratnayake; Jenni Perrin; Sanjay Pandanaboyana
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Outcomes After Bowel Resection for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Era of Surgical Care Bundles and Enhanced Recovery.

Authors:  Anthony P D'Andrea; Prerna Khetan; Reba Miller; Patricia Sylla; Celia M Divino
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Colorectal surgery and surgical site infection: is a change of attitude necessary?

Authors:  Manuela Elia-Guedea; Elena Cordoba-Diaz de Laspra; Estibaliz Echazarreta-Gallego; María Isabel Valero-Lazaro; Jose Manuel Ramirez-Rodriguez; Vicente Aguilella-Diago
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  The role of antimicrobial sutures in preventing surgical site infection.

Authors:  D Leaper; P Wilson; O Assadian; C Edmiston; M Kiernan; A Miller; G Bond-Smith; J Yap
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 8.  Perioperative Glycemic Control During Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Rachel E Thompson; Elizabeth K Broussard; David R Flum; Brent E Wisse
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 9.  The Case for Diabetes Population Health Improvement: Evidence-Based Programming for Population Outcomes in Diabetes.

Authors:  Sherita Hill Golden; Nisa Maruthur; Nestoras Mathioudakis; Elias Spanakis; Daniel Rubin; Mihail Zilbermint; Felicia Hill-Briggs
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.810

10.  A perioperative multidisciplinary care bundle reduces surgical site infections in patients undergoing synchronous colorectal and liver resection.

Authors:  Lauren S Tufts; Emma D Jarnagin; Jessica R Flynn; Mithat Gonen; Jose G Guillem; Philip B Paty; Garrett M Nash; Joshua J Smith; Iris H Wei; Emmanouil Pappou; Michael I D'Angelica; Peter J Allen; T Peter Kingham; Vinod P Balachandran; Jeffrey A Drebin; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; William R Jarnagin; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.