Literature DB >> 25920507

Hydrodynamics of C-Start Escape Responses of Fish as Studied with Simple Physical Models.

William C Witt1, Li Wen1, George V Lauder2.   

Abstract

One of the most-studied unsteady locomotor behaviors exhibited by fishes is the c-start escape response. Although the kinematics of these responses have been studied extensively and two well-defined kinematic stages have been documented, only a few studies have focused on hydrodynamic patterns generated by fishes executing escape behaviors. Previous work has shown that escape responses by bluegill sunfish generate three distinct vortex rings, each with central orthogonal jet flows, and here we extend this conclusion to two other species: stickleback and mosquitofish. Jet #1 is formed by the tail during Stage 1, and moves in the same direction as Stage-2 movement of the fish, thereby reducing final escape-velocity but also rotating the fish. Jet #2, in contrast, moves approximately opposite to the final direction of the fish's motion and contains the bulk of the total fluid-momentum powering the escape response. Jet #3 forms during Stage 2 in the mid-body region and moves in a direction approximately perpendicular to jets 1 and 2, across the direction of movement of the body. In this study, we used a mechanical controller to impulsively move passively flexible plastic panels of three different stiffnesses in heave, pitch, and heave + pitch motions to study the effects of stiffness on unsteady hydrodynamics of escape. We were able to produce kinematics very similar to those of fish c-starts and also to reproduce the 3-jet hydrodynamic pattern of the c-start using a panel of medium flexural stiffness and the combined heave + pitch motion. This medium-stiffness panel matched the measured stiffness of the near-tail region of fish bodies. This motion also produced positive power when the panel straightened during stage 2 of the escape response. More flexible and stiffer panels resulted in non-biological kinematics and patterns of flow for all motions. The use of simple flexible models with a mechanical controller and program of fish-like motion is a promising approach for studying unsteady behaviors of fish which can be difficult to manipulate experimentally in live animals.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25920507     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icv016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  6 in total

1.  Soft Biomimetic Fish Robot Made of Dielectric Elastomer Actuators.

Authors:  Jun Shintake; Vito Cacucciolo; Herbert Shea; Dario Floreano
Journal:  Soft Robot       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Dynamics and locomotion of flexible foils in a frictional environment.

Authors:  Xiaolin Wang; Silas Alben
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.704

3.  Tuna robotics: hydrodynamics of rapid linear accelerations.

Authors:  Robin Thandiackal; Carl H White; Hilary Bart-Smith; George V Lauder
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Changes in rays' swimming stability due to the phase difference between left and right pectoral fin movements.

Authors:  Hiroaki Sumikawa; Yoshikazu Naraoka; Takashi Fukue; Tasuku Miyoshi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Ear-body lift and a novel thrust generating mechanism revealed by the complex wake of brown long-eared bats (Plecotus auritus).

Authors:  L Christoffer Johansson; Jonas Håkansson; Lasse Jakobsen; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  In vivo quantification of mechanical properties of caudal fins in adult zebrafish.

Authors:  Sahil Puri; Tinri Aegerter-Wilmsen; Anna Jaźwińska; Christof M Aegerter
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.312

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.