Literature DB >> 25919348

Translating Professional Obligations to Care for Patients With Ebola Virus Disease Into Practice in Nonepidemic Settings.

Jeremy Sugarman1, Nancy Kass1, Cynda H Rushton1, Mark T Hughes1, Thomas D Kirsch2.   

Abstract

Determining how clinicians should meet their professional obligations to treat patients with Ebola virus disease in nonepidemic settings necessitates considering measures to minimize risks to clinicians, the context of care, and fairness. Minimizing risks includes providing appropriate equipment and training, implementing strategies for reducing exposure to infectious material, identifying a small number of centers to provide care, and determining which risky procedures should be used when they pose minimal likelihood of appreciable clinical benefit. Factors associated with the clinical environment, such as the local prevalence of the disease, the nature of the setting, and the availability of effective treatment, are also relevant to obligations to treat. Fairness demands that the best possible medical care be provided for health care professionals who become infected and that the rights and interests of relevant stakeholders be addressed through policy-making processes. Going forward it will be essential to learn from current approaches and to modify them based on data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ebola; duty to treat; ethics; health care professional

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25919348     DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2015.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep        ISSN: 1935-7893            Impact factor:   1.385


  1 in total

1.  A Duty to treat? A Right to refrain? Bangladeshi physicians in moral dilemma during COVID-19.

Authors:  Norman K Swazo; Md Munir Hossain Talukder; Mohammad Kamrul Ahsan
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.464

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.