Literature DB >> 25919263

Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields Reduce Postoperative Interleukin-1β, Pain, and Inflammation: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction Patients.

Christine H Rohde1, Erin M Taylor, Amanda Alonso, Jeffrey A Ascherman, Krista L Hardy, Arthur A Pilla.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulsed electromagnetic fields have been shown to reduce postoperative pain, inflammation, and narcotic requirements after breast reduction and augmentation surgical procedures. This study examined whether pulsed electromagnetic field therapy could produce similar results in patients undergoing unilateral transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction, a significantly more complex and painful surgical procedure.
METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study, 32 patients undergoing unilateral TRAM flap breast reconstruction received active or sham pulsed electromagnetic field therapy. Pain levels were measured by using a visual analogue scale; narcotic use and wound exudate volume were recorded starting 1 hour postoperatively. Wound exudates were analyzed for interleukin-1β.
RESULTS: Mean visual analogue scale pain scores were 2-fold higher in the sham cohort at 5 hours and 4-fold higher at 72 hours (p < 0.01), along with a concomitant 2-fold increase in narcotic use in sham patients (p < 0.01). Wound exudate volume was 2-fold higher in the sham cohort at 24 hours (p < 0.01), and mean interleukin-1β concentration in wound exudates of sham patients was 5-fold higher at 24 hours (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy significantly reduced postoperative pain, inflammation, and narcotic use following TRAM flap breast reconstruction, paralleling its effect in breast reduction patients. Both studies also report a significant reduction of interleukin-1β in the wound exudate, supporting a mechanism involving a pulsed electromagnetic field effect on nitric oxide/cyclic guanosine monophosphate signaling, which modulates the body's antiinflammatory pathways. Adjunctive pulsed electromagnetic field therapy could impact the speed and quality of wound repair in many surgical procedures. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, I.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25919263     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

1.  Effect of 50-Hz Magnetic Fields on Serum IL-1β and IL-23 and Expression of BLIMP-1, XBP-1, and IRF-4.

Authors:  Setare Molaei; Mahdi Alahgholi-Hajibehzad; Mohammad Gholamian-Hamadan; Zohre Zaerieghane; Alireza Zamani
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.092

Review 2.  Multidimensional insights into the repeated electromagnetic field stimulation and biosystems interaction in aging and age-related diseases.

Authors:  Felipe P Perez; Joseph P Bandeira; Cristina N Perez Chumbiauca; Debomoy K Lahiri; Jorge Morisaki; Maher Rizkalla
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 12.771

Review 3.  Consensus Review of Optimal Perioperative Care in Breast Reconstruction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  Claire Temple-Oberle; Melissa A Shea-Budgell; Mark Tan; John L Semple; Christiaan Schrag; Marcio Barreto; Phillip Blondeel; Jeremy Hamming; Joseph Dayan; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.169

4.  Repeated electromagnetic field stimulation lowers amyloid-β peptide levels in primary human mixed brain tissue cultures.

Authors:  Felipe P Perez; Bryan Maloney; Nipun Chopra; Jorge J Morisaki; Debomoy K Lahiri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  Wound fluid sampling methods for proteomic studies: A scoping review.

Authors:  Joe Harvey; Kieran T Mellody; Nicky Cullum; Rachel E B Watson; Jo Dumville
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.401

6.  Analgesic effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields for mammaplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Wei Ding; Yu Ji
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.