Literature DB >> 25919085

How communication changes when we cannot mime the world: Experimental evidence for the effect of iconicity on combinatoriality.

Gareth Roberts1, Jirka Lewandowski2, Bruno Galantucci3.   

Abstract

Communication systems are exposed to two different pressures: a pressure for transmission efficiency, such that messages are simple to produce and perceive, and a pressure for referential efficiency, such that messages are easy to understand with their intended meaning. A solution to the first pressure is combinatoriality--the recombination of a few basic meaningless forms to express an infinite number of meanings. A solution to the second is iconicity--the use of forms that resemble what they refer to. These two solutions appear to be incompatible with each other, as iconic forms are ill-suited for use as meaningless combinatorial units. Furthermore, in the early stages of a communication system, when basic referential forms are in the process of being established, the pressure for referential efficiency is likely to be particularly strong, which may lead it to trump the pressure for transmission efficiency. This means that, where iconicity is available as a strategy, it is likely to impede the emergence of combinatoriality. Although this hypothesis seems consistent with some observations of natural language, it was unclear until recently how it could be soundly tested. This has changed thanks to the development of a line of research, known as Experimental Semiotics, in which participants construct novel communication systems in the laboratory using an unfamiliar medium. We conducted an Experimental Semiotic study in which we manipulated the opportunity for iconicity by varying the kind of referents to be communicated, while keeping the communication medium constant. We then measured the combinatoriality and transmission efficiency of the communication systems. We found that, where iconicity was available, it provided scaffolding for the construction of communication systems and was overwhelmingly adopted. Where it was not available, however, the resulting communication systems were more combinatorial and their forms more efficient to produce. This study enriches our understanding of the fundamental design principles of human communication and contributes tools to enrich it further.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bootstrapping communication; Experimental Semiotics; Language evolution; Sign language; Signs

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25919085     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  6 in total

1.  Amount of Learning and Signal Stability Modulate Emergence of Structure and Iconicity in Novel Signaling Systems.

Authors:  Vera Kempe; Nicolas Gauvrit; Nikolay Panayotov; Sheila Cunningham; Monica Tamariz
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-11

Review 2.  Evolution of speech-specific cognitive adaptations.

Authors:  Bart de Boer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-29

3.  Why 'piss' is ruder than 'pee'? The role of sound in affective meaning making.

Authors:  Arash Aryani; Markus Conrad; David Schmidtke; Arthur Jacobs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication.

Authors:  Przemysław Żywiczyński; Sławomir Wacewicz; Casey Lister
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Using leap motion to investigate the emergence of structure in speech and language.

Authors:  Kerem Eryilmaz; Hannah Little
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-10

6.  How Culture and Biology Interact to Shape Language and the Language Faculty.

Authors:  Kenny Smith
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-09-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.