| Literature DB >> 25918401 |
Mark F Lunt1, Matthew Rigby2, Anita L Ganesan2, Alistair J Manning3, Ronald G Prinn4, Simon O'Doherty2, Jens Mühle5, Christina M Harth5, Peter K Salameh5, Tim Arnold3, Ray F Weiss5, Takuya Saito6, Yoko Yokouchi6, Paul B Krummel7, L Paul Steele7, Paul J Fraser7, Shanlan Li8, Sunyoung Park9, Stefan Reimann10, Martin K Vollmer10, Chris Lunder11, Ove Hermansen11, Norbert Schmidbauer11, Michela Maione12, Jgor Arduini12, Dickon Young2, Peter G Simmonds2.
Abstract
We infer global and regional emissions of five of the most abundant hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) using atmospheric measurements from the Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment and the National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan, networks. We find that the total CO2-equivalent emissions of the five HFCs from countries that are required to provide detailed, annual reports to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) increased from 198 (175-221) Tg-CO2-eq ⋅ y(-1) in 2007 to 275 (246-304) Tg-CO2-eq ⋅ y(-1) in 2012. These global warming potential-weighted aggregated emissions agree well with those reported to the UNFCCC throughout this period and indicate that the gap between reported emissions and global HFC emissions derived from atmospheric trends is almost entirely due to emissions from nonreporting countries. However, our measurement-based estimates of individual HFC species suggest that emissions, from reporting countries, of the most abundant HFC, HFC-134a, were only 79% (63-95%) of the UNFCCC inventory total, while other HFC emissions were significantly greater than the reported values. These results suggest that there are inaccuracies in the reporting methods for individual HFCs, which appear to cancel when aggregated together.Entities:
Keywords: climate change; halocarbons; radiative forcing
Year: 2015 PMID: 25918401 PMCID: PMC4434701 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1420247112
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205