Literature DB >> 25918366

Assortative mating without assortative preference.

Yu Xie1, Siwei Cheng2, Xiang Zhou2.   

Abstract

Assortative mating--marriage of a man and a woman with similar social characteristics--is a commonly observed phenomenon. In the existing literature in both sociology and economics, this phenomenon has mainly been attributed to individuals' conscious preferences for assortative mating. In this paper, we show that patterns of assortative mating may arise from another structural source even if individuals do not have assortative preferences or possess complementary attributes: dynamic processes of marriages in a closed system. For a given cohort of youth in a finite population, as the percentage of married persons increases, unmarried persons who newly enter marriage are systematically different from those who married earlier, giving rise to the phenomenon of assortative mating. We use microsimulation methods to illustrate this dynamic process, using first the conventional deterministic Gale-Shapley model, then a probabilistic Gale-Shapley model, and then two versions of the encounter mating model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gale–Shapley model; assortative mating; composition heterogeneity; encounter mating model; structural effect

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25918366      PMCID: PMC4434718          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1504811112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  8 in total

1.  Intermarriage and homogamy: causes, patterns, trends.

Authors:  M Kalmijn
Journal:  Annu Rev Sociol       Date:  1998

2.  Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003.

Authors:  Christine R Schwartz; Robert D Mare
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2005-11

3.  A preference-opportunity-choice framework with applications to intergroup friendship.

Authors:  Zhen Zeng; Yu Xie
Journal:  AJS       Date:  2008-11

4.  Population heterogeneity and causal inference.

Authors:  Yu Xie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Processes of pair formation leading to assortative mating in biological populations: dynamic interaction model.

Authors:  A Gimelfarb
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Breaking the racial barriers: variations in interracial marriage between 1980 and 1990.

Authors:  Z Qian
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1997-05

7.  Earnings Inequality and the Changing Association between Spouses' Earnings.

Authors:  Christine R Schwartz
Journal:  AJS       Date:  2010-03-01

8.  Educational assortative mating and economic inequality: a comparative analysis of three Latin American countries.

Authors:  Florencia Torche
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2010-05
  8 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Why do we pick similar mates, or do we?

Authors:  Thomas M M Versluys; Ewan O Flintham; Alex Mas-Sandoval; Vincent Savolainen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  A New Methodological Framework for Studying Status Exchange in Marriage.

Authors:  Yu Xie; Hao Dong
Journal:  AJS       Date:  2021-03

3.  Social inheritance can explain the structure of animal social networks.

Authors:  Amiyaal Ilany; Erol Akçay
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Marrying Up by Marrying Down: Status Exchange between Social Origin and Education in the United States.

Authors:  Christine R Schwartz; Zhen Zeng; Yu Xie
Journal:  Sociol Sci       Date:  2016-11-28

5.  Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries.

Authors:  Daniel Conroy-Beam; David M Buss; Kelly Asao; Agnieszka Sorokowska; Piotr Sorokowski; Toivo Aavik; Grace Akello; Mohammad Madallh Alhabahba; Charlotte Alm; Naumana Amjad; Afifa Anjum; Chiemezie S Atama; Derya Atamtürk Duyar; Richard Ayebare; Carlota Batres; Mons Bendixen; Aicha Bensafia; Boris Bizumic; Mahmoud Boussena; Marina Butovskaya; Seda Can; Katarzyna Cantarero; Antonin Carrier; Hakan Cetinkaya; Ilona Croy; Rosa María Cueto; Marcin Czub; Daria Dronova; Seda Dural; Izzet Duyar; Berna Ertugrul; Agustín Espinosa; Ignacio Estevan; Carla Sofia Esteves; Luxi Fang; Tomasz Frackowiak; Jorge Contreras Garduño; Karina Ugalde González; Farida Guemaz; Petra Gyuris; Mária Halamová; Iskra Herak; Marina Horvat; Ivana Hromatko; Chin-Ming Hui; Jas Laile Jaafar; Feng Jiang; Konstantinos Kafetsios; Tina Kavčič; Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair; Nicolas Kervyn; Truong Thi Khanh Ha; Imran Ahmed Khilji; Nils C Köbis; Hoang Moc Lan; András Láng; Georgina R Lennard; Ernesto León; Torun Lindholm; Trinh Thi Linh; Giulia Lopez; Nguyen Van Luot; Alvaro Mailhos; Zoi Manesi; Rocio Martinez; Sarah L McKerchar; Norbert Meskó; Girishwar Misra; Conal Monaghan; Emanuel C Mora; Alba Moya-Garófano; Bojan Musil; Jean Carlos Natividade; Agnieszka Niemczyk; George Nizharadze; Elisabeth Oberzaucher; Anna Oleszkiewicz; Mohd Sofian Omar-Fauzee; Ike E Onyishi; Baris Özener; Ariela Francesca Pagani; Vilmante Pakalniskiene; Miriam Parise; Farid Pazhoohi; Annette Pisanski; Katarzyna Pisanski; Edna Ponciano; Camelia Popa; Pavol Prokop; Muhammad Rizwan; Mario Sainz; Svjetlana Salkičević; Ruta Sargautyte; Ivan Sarmány-Schuller; Susanne Schmehl; Shivantika Sharad; Razi Sultan Siddiqui; Franco Simonetti; Stanislava Yordanova Stoyanova; Meri Tadinac; Marco Antonio Correa Varella; Christin-Melanie Vauclair; Luis Diego Vega; Dwi Ajeng Widarini; Gyesook Yoo; Marta Zaťková; Maja Zupančič
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Aspirational pursuit of mates in online dating markets.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Bruch; M E J Newman
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Spouses' faces are similar but do not become more similar with time.

Authors:  Pin Pin Tea-Makorn; Michal Kosinski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.