Literature DB >> 25917138

Decomposing socio-economic inequality in colorectal cancer screening uptake in England.

Francesca Solmi1, Christian Von Wagner2, Lindsay C Kobayashi2, Rosalind Raine3, Jane Wardle2, Stephen Morris3.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second largest cause of cancer death in the UK. Since 2010, CRC screening based on Faecal Occult Blood testing has been offered by the NHS in England biennially to all persons age 60-69 years. Several studies have demonstrated a gradient in uptake using area-level markers of socio-economic status (SES), but few have examined the individual-level contributors to the gradient. We aimed to quantify the extent of SES inequality in CRC screening uptake in England using individual-level data, and to identify individual factors associated with this inequality. We used data from 1833 participants (aged 61-69) in Wave 5 (collected in years 2010/11) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) eligible for having been sent at least one CRC screening invitation. Uptake was defined by self-report of ever having been screened as part of the National Screening Programme. We assessed socio-economic inequality using the corrected concentration index of uptake against SES rank, which was derived by regressing a range of SES markers against net non-pension household wealth. Other demographic and health-related variables were included in the analysis. Factors associated with inequality were measured using concentration index decomposition. There was a significant pro-rich gradient in screening uptake (concentration index: 0.16, 95% CI:0.11-0.22), mostly explained within our model by differences in non-pension wealth (38.7%), partner screening status (15.9%), sickness/disability (13.5%), and health literacy (8.5%). Interventions aimed at reducing inequalities in CRC screening uptake should focus on improving acceptability of screening in populations with low levels of education and literacy barriers.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Concentration; Decomposition analyses; ELSA; England; Health literacy; Index; Inequalities; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25917138     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  20 in total

1.  Decomposing Educational Inequalities in Child Mortality: A Temporal Trend Analysis of Access to Water and Sanitation in Peru.

Authors:  Tasneem Bohra; Tarik Benmarhnia; Britt McKinnon; Jay S Kaufman
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Predicting Self-Management Behaviors in Familial Hypercholesterolemia Using an Integrated Theoretical Model: the Impact of Beliefs About Illnesses and Beliefs About Behaviors.

Authors:  Martin S Hagger; Sarah J Hardcastle; Catherine Hingley; Ella Strickland; Jing Pang; Gerald F Watts
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2016-06

3.  The Costs and Benefits of Risk Stratification for Colorectal Cancer Screening Based On Phenotypic and Genetic Risk: A Health Economic Analysis.

Authors:  Chloe Thomas; Olena Mandrik; Catherine L Saunders; Deborah Thompson; Sophie Whyte; Simon Griffin; Juliet A Usher-Smith
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2021-05-26

4.  Assessment of trends in socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening services in Korea, 1998-2012.

Authors:  Sujin Kim; Jongnam Hwang
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2016-02-24

5.  A lack of information engagement among colorectal cancer screening non-attenders: cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Lindsay C Kobayashi; Jo Waller; Christian von Wagner; Jane Wardle
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Association between socioeconomic deprivation and colorectal cancer screening outcomes: Low uptake rates among the most and least deprived people.

Authors:  Andrea Buron; Josep M Auge; Maria Sala; Marta Román; Antoni Castells; Francesc Macià; Mercè Comas; Carolina Guiriguet; Xavier Bessa; Xavier Castells
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Measuring and Decomposing Socioeconomic Inequalities in Adult Obesity in Western Iran.

Authors:  Farid Najafi; Yahya Pasdar; Behrooz Hamzeh; Satar Rezaei; Mehdi Moradi Nazar; Moslem Soofi
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2018-10-29

8.  Knowledge and Informed Decision-Making about Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation in Groups with Low and Adequate Health Literacy.

Authors:  M L Essink-Bot; E Dekker; D R M Timmermans; E Uiters; M P Fransen
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.260

9.  Why are the public so positive about colorectal cancer screening?

Authors:  Linda N Douma; Ellen Uiters; Danielle R M Timmermans
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Disability and participation in breast and bowel cancer screening in England: a large prospective study.

Authors:  S Floud; I Barnes; M Verfürden; H Kuper; T Gathani; R G Blanks; R Alison; J Patnick; V Beral; J Green; G K Reeves
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.