Literature DB >> 25916876

Does Thoracoscopic Surgery Decrease the Morbidity of Combined Lung and Chest Wall Resection?

Mark W Hennon1, Elisabeth U Dexter1, Miriam Huang1, John Kane2, Chukwumere Nwogu1, Anthony Picone3, Sai Yendamuri1, Todd L Demmy4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because the traditional open lung approach with en bloc chest wall resection carries substantial risk for complications and death, we studied our thoracoscopic approach for this operation.
METHODS: From 2007 to 2013, all consecutive video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) and open chest wall resections at a comprehensive cancer center were tabulated retrospectively. Data were analyzed by approach, type, and cause of early major morbidity and mortality. Lung cancer cases (the largest subset, T3) were analyzed separately. Statistical tests included the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and the χ(2) for categoric variables. Survival data were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests.
RESULTS: Of 47 chest wall resections performed, 17 (36%) were performed by VATS with no conversions. Resections were performed for primary non-small cell lung cancer (15 VATS and 16 thoracotomy), sarcoma (11), metastatic disease from a separate primary (2), and benign conditions (3). Patients undergoing a VATS approach were older (76 vs 56 years, p = 0.003), and the operative times, blood loss, and ribs resected were similar between groups. Patients undergoing VATS had shorter intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, but both groups had high hospital morbidity and mortality, largely resulting from postoperative pneumonia or respiratory systemic inflammatory response syndrome (n = 5), stroke (n = 2), and postoperative colon ischemia (n = 1). Groups had a 90-day mortality of 26.7% and 25% respectively. Stage-matched survival curves for both approaches were superimposable (p=0.88).
CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic chest wall resection was feasible, expanded our case selection, and reduced prosthetic reconstruction. It did not, however, protect frail, elderly patients reliably. Briefer, less traumatic operations may be needed for this cohort.
Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25916876     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.02.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  7 in total

Review 1.  Single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS)-advanced procedures & update.

Authors:  William Guido-Guerrero; Albert Bolaños-Cubillo; Diego González-Rivas
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Robotic assisted VATS lobectomy for loco-regionally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Simon R Turner; M Jawad Latif; Bernard J Park
Journal:  Video Assist Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-02-27

Review 3.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Mingyon Mun; Masayuki Nakao; Yosuke Matsuura; Junji Ichinose; Ken Nakagawa; Sakae Okumura
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-07-30

Review 4.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery en bloc chest wall resection.

Authors:  Agnese Giaccone; Piergiorgio Solli; Alessandro Pardolesi; Jury Brandolini; Luca Bertolaccini
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-05-25

Review 5.  Extended uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: is it feasible?

Authors:  Iñigo Royo-Crespo; Arthur Vieira; Paula A Ugalde
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-03-23

6.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy with chest wall resection.

Authors:  Guilherme Dal Agnol; Ricardo Oliveira; Paula A Ugalde
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Rib resection using a Gigli saw under thoracoscopic guidance.

Authors:  Ilhan Ocakcioglu; Fuat Sayir
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 1.195

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.