BACKGROUND: The accuracy of ultrasonography for diagnosing meniscal injury remains controversial. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to establish the role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of meniscal injury by analyzing the data from prospectively designed studies. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by searching electronic bibliographic databases prior to November 2014. Studies with diagnostic results that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed. Sensitivity, specificity and other measures of the accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of meniscal injury were summarized. Summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) curves were used to summarize overall test performance. Publication bias was assessed used Deek's funnel plot asymmetry test. RESULTS: Seven prospective studies with 551 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies scores for the included studies ranged from 10-13. The summary estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of meniscal injury were 0.88 (95 % CI 0.84-0.91), 0.90 (95 % CI 0.86-0.93), 7.07 (95 % CI 4.34-11.52), 0.17 (95 % CI 0.10-0.26) and 58.13 (95 % CI 24.38-138.62), respectively. There was moderate to significant heterogeneity across the above measures (P < 0.05). The area under the curve of the SROC was 0.948, indicating a high overall diagnostic accuracy. No publication bias was noted across the studies (P = 0.393), which suggested little influence of publication bias on the overall results. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for diagnosing meniscal injury is acceptable, with a high specificity but moderate sensitivity.
BACKGROUND: The accuracy of ultrasonography for diagnosing meniscal injury remains controversial. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to establish the role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of meniscal injury by analyzing the data from prospectively designed studies. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by searching electronic bibliographic databases prior to November 2014. Studies with diagnostic results that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed. Sensitivity, specificity and other measures of the accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of meniscal injury were summarized. Summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) curves were used to summarize overall test performance. Publication bias was assessed used Deek's funnel plot asymmetry test. RESULTS: Seven prospective studies with 551 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies scores for the included studies ranged from 10-13. The summary estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of meniscal injury were 0.88 (95 % CI 0.84-0.91), 0.90 (95 % CI 0.86-0.93), 7.07 (95 % CI 4.34-11.52), 0.17 (95 % CI 0.10-0.26) and 58.13 (95 % CI 24.38-138.62), respectively. There was moderate to significant heterogeneity across the above measures (P < 0.05). The area under the curve of the SROC was 0.948, indicating a high overall diagnostic accuracy. No publication bias was noted across the studies (P = 0.393), which suggested little influence of publication bias on the overall results. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for diagnosing meniscal injury is acceptable, with a high specificity but moderate sensitivity.
Authors: Luca Maria Sconfienza; Domenico Albano; Georgina Allen; Alberto Bazzocchi; Bianca Bignotti; Vito Chianca; Fernando Facal de Castro; Elena E Drakonaki; Elena Gallardo; Jan Gielen; Andrea Sabine Klauser; Carlo Martinoli; Giovanni Mauri; Eugene McNally; Carmelo Messina; Rebeca Mirón Mombiela; Davide Orlandi; Athena Plagou; Magdalena Posadzy; Rosa de la Puente; Monique Reijnierse; Federica Rossi; Saulius Rutkauskas; Ziga Snoj; Jelena Vucetic; David Wilson; Alberto Stefano Tagliafico Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Manon Breukers; Dorieke Haase; Stephan Konijnenberg; Tiburtius V S Klos; Geert-Jan Dinant; Ramon P G Ottenheijm Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2019-12-17