Literature DB >> 25916682

nMARQ Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Results from a Multicenter Study.

Saagar Mahida1, Darren A Hooks1, Karin Nentwich2, G Andre Ng3, Massimo Grimaldi4, Dong-In Shin5, Nicolas Derval1, Frederic Sacher1, Benjamin Berte1, Seigo Yamashita1, Arnaud Denis1, Mélèze Hocini1, Thomas Deneke2, Michel Haissaguerre1, Pierre Jais1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: nMARQ is a multipolar catheter designed to simultaneously ablate at multiple sites around the pulmonary vein (PV) circumference with a single radiofrequency application. We sought to define the safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with the nMARQ catheter.
METHODS: In a multicenter study, patients with drug-refractory AF were included. Procedural outcomes were documented at 1 year.
RESULTS: 374 patients underwent PV isolation using nMARQ (age 60 ± 10 years, 264 male), of whom 263 patients had paroxysmal AF (PAF), while 111 patients had persistent AF. A total of 1,468 of 1,474 veins (99.6%) were isolated with the nMARQ catheter alone. Thirty-five (13%) PAF patients and 30 (27%) persistent AF patients underwent additional ablation at non-PV sites (2.4 ± 1.4 non-PV sites). Procedure time for PV isolation only was 1.9 ± 0.7 hours (fluoroscopy 24 ± 14 minutes). Procedure time for PV isolation and non-PV ablation was 2.4 ± 1.0 hours (fluoroscopy 30 ± 23 minutes). Major adverse events occurred in two patients (0.5%); one esophago-pericardial fistula and a second, mortality due to sepsis of unknown cause. One-year follow-up data were available in 65 (25%) PAF and 20 (18%) persistent AF patients. Forty-two (65%) PAF and 13 (65%) persistent AF patients were free of arrhythmia at 1 year. In patients undergoing repeat procedures (n = 17) the most frequent points of PV reconnection were: anterior RSPV, inferior RIPV, and superior LSPV.
CONCLUSIONS: AF ablation with nMARQ is associated with short procedure times and high acute success rates. Further research is necessary to more clearly define long-term outcome.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; atrioesophageal fistula; catheter ablation; nMARQ catheter

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25916682     DOI: 10.1111/jce.12698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  11 in total

1.  Ablation of atrial fibrillation: single-shot techniques poised to dominate rhythm control strategies/the future is here.

Authors:  Antonis S Manolis
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  A 5-year clinical follow-up after duty-cycled phased RF ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Antoine Lepillier; Xavier Copie; Gilles Lascault; Olivier Paziaud; Olivier Piot
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Pulmonary Vein Isolation with the Multipolar nMARQ™ Ablation Catheter: Efficacy And Safety In Acute And Long-Term Follow Up.

Authors:  Johannes Siebermair; Michelle Silver; Reza Wakili
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2017-04-30

Review 4.  Comparison of the Efficacy of PVAC® and nMARQ for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Avishag Laish-Farkash; Mahmoud Suleiman
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2017-04-30

5.  Current Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: An Alert for the Prevention and Treatment of Esophageal Lesions.

Authors:  Mauricio Scanavacca
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Single-catheter approach to pulmonary vein reisolation in selected patients : Data from a prospective registry.

Authors:  J Lauschke; R Schneider; J Wissmann; T Tischer; D Bänsch
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 7.  Who Needs Catheter Ablation And Which Approach?

Authors:  Duygu Kocyigit; Ugur Canpolat; Kudret Aytemir
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-12-31

Review 8.  Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Review of the Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Daniel P Melby
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2017-11-15

9.  Pulmonary vein isolation using multi-electrode radiofrequency vs conventional point-by-point radiofrequency ablation: A meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies.

Authors:  Dursun Aras; Serkan Topaloglu; Serkan Cay; Ozcan Ozeke; Firat Ozcan; Goksel Cagirci
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2017-02-20

10.  Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Peri-Procedural Complication Rates in nMARQ vs. Conventional Ablation Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ka H C Li; Mei Dong; Mengqi Gong; George Bazoukis; Ishan Lakhani; Yan Y Ting; Sunny H Wong; Guangping Li; William K K Wu; Vassilios S Vassiliou; Martin C S Wong; Konstantinos Letsas; Yimei Du; Victoria Laxton; Bryan P Yan; Yat S Chan; Yunlong Xia; Tong Liu; Gary Tse
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.