Literature DB >> 25916465

Parasitic nematode communities of the red kangaroo, Macropus rufus: richness and structuring in captive systems.

M J Lott1, G C Hose, M L Power.   

Abstract

Captive management practices have the potential to drastically alter pre-existing host-parasite relationships. This can have profound implications for the health and productivity of threatened species in captivity, even in the absence of clinical symptoms of disease. Maximising the success of captive breeding programmes requires a detailed knowledge of anthropogenic influences on the structure of parasite assemblages in captive systems. In this study, we employed two high-throughput molecular techniques to characterise the parasitic nematode (suborder Strongylida) communities of the red kangaroo, Macropus rufus, across seven captive sites. The first was terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis of a region of rDNA encompassing the internal transcribed spacers 1 (ITS1), the 5.8S rRNA gene and the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2). The second was Illumina MiSeq next-generation sequencing of the ITS2 region. The prevalence, intensity of infection, taxonomic composition and comparative structure of strongylid nematode assemblages was assessed at each location. Prevalence (P = <0.001) and mean infection intensity (df = 6, F = 17.494, P = <0.001) differed significantly between the seven captive sites. Significant levels of parasite community structure were observed (ANOSIM, P = 0.01), with most of the variation being distributed within, rather than between, captive sites. The range of nematode taxa that occurred in captive red kangaroos appeared to differ from that of wild conspecifics, with representatives of the genus Cloacina, a dominant nematode parasite of the macropodid forestomach, being detected at only two of the seven study sites. This study also provides the first evidence for the presence of the genus Trichostrongylus in a macropodid marsupial. Our results demonstrate that contemporary species management practices may exert a profound influence on the structure of parasite communities in captive systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25916465     DOI: 10.1007/s00436-015-4494-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitol Res        ISSN: 0932-0113            Impact factor:   2.289


  33 in total

Review 1.  Food webs and the transmission of parasites to marine fish.

Authors:  D J Marcogliese
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.234

2.  T-RFLP combined with principal component analysis and 16S rRNA gene sequencing: an effective strategy for comparison of fecal microbiota in infants of different ages.

Authors:  M Wang; S Ahrné; M Antonsson; G Molin
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  Relative diversity and community structure analysis of rumen protozoa according to T-RFLP and microscopic methods.

Authors:  Lisa Tymensen; Cindy Barkley; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.363

Review 4.  Sequencing technologies - the next generation.

Authors:  Michael L Metzker
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  [A simple flotation and McMaster method (author's transl)].

Authors:  S A Henriksen; K Aagaard
Journal:  Nord Vet Med       Date:  1976 Jul-Aug

6.  Towards the molecular characterisation of parasitic nematode assemblages: an evaluation of terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis.

Authors:  M J Lott; G C Hose; M L Power
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.011

7.  A SURVEY OF THE ENDOPARASITES OF THE RED KANGAROO MEGALEIA RUFA (DESMAREST).

Authors:  R MYKYTOWYCZ
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  1964-11       Impact factor: 3.234

8.  Nematode community structure in the brush-tailed rock-wallaby, Petrogale penicillata: implications of captive breeding and the translocation of wildlife.

Authors:  M J Lott; M D B Eldridge; G C Hose; M L Power
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 2.011

9.  Does the early frog catch the worm? Disentangling potential drivers of a parasite age-intensity relationship in tadpoles.

Authors:  Thomas R Raffel; James O Lloyd-Smith; Stanley K Sessions; Peter J Hudson; Jason R Rohr
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 10.  Neglected wild life: Parasitic biodiversity as a conservation target.

Authors:  Andrés Gómez; Elizabeth Nichols
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 2.674

View more
  2 in total

1.  Metabarcoding analysis of strongylid nematode diversity in two sympatric primate species.

Authors:  Barbora Pafčo; Dagmar Čížková; Jakub Kreisinger; Hideo Hasegawa; Peter Vallo; Kathryn Shutt; Angelique Todd; Klára J Petrželková; David Modrý
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Characterization of ecto- and endoparasite communities of wild Mediterranean teleosts by a metabarcoding approach.

Authors:  Mathilde Scheifler; Magdalena Ruiz-Rodríguez; Sophie Sanchez-Brosseau; Elodie Magnanou; Marcelino T Suzuki; Nyree West; Sébastien Duperron; Yves Desdevises
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.