Literature DB >> 25915955

Online Calibration of Glucose Sensors From the Measured Current by a Time-Varying Calibration Function and Bayesian Priors.

Martina Vettoretti, Andrea Facchinetti, Simone Del Favero, Giovanni Sparacino, Claudio Cobelli.   

Abstract

GOAL: Minimally invasive continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensors measure in the subcutis a current signal, which is converted into interstitial glucose (IG) concentration by a calibration process periodically updated using fingerstick blood glucose (BG) references. Though important in diabetes management, CGM sensors still suffer from accuracy problems. Here, we propose a new online calibration method improving accuracy of CGM glucose profiles with respect to manufacturer calibration.
METHOD: The proposed method fits CGM current signal against the BG references collected twice a day for calibration purposes, by a time-varying calibration function whose parameters are identified in a Bayesian framework using a priori second-order statistical knowledge. The distortion introduced by BG-to-IG kinetics is compensated before parameter identification via nonparametric deconvolution.
RESULTS: The method was tested on a database where 108 CGM signals were collected for 7 days by the Dexcom G4 Platinum sensor. Results show the new method drives to a statistically significant accuracy improvement as measured by three commonly used metrics: mean absolute relative difference reduced from 12.73% to 11.47%; percentage of accurate glucose estimates increased from 82.00% to 89.19%; and percentage of values falling in the "A" zone of the Clark error grid increased from 82.22% to 88.86%.
CONCLUSION: The new calibration method significantly improves CGM glucose profiles accuracy with respect to manufacturer calibration. SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed algorithm provides a real-time improvement of CGM accuracy, which can be crucial in several CGM-based applications, including the artificial pancreas, thus providing a potential great impact in the diabetes technology research community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25915955     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2426217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  7 in total

1.  Factory-Calibrated Continuous Glucose Monitoring: How and Why It Works, and the Dangers of Reuse Beyond Approved Duration of Wear.

Authors:  Gregory P Forlenza; Taisa Kushner; Laurel H Messer; R Paul Wadwa; Sriram Sankaranarayanan
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  A Personalized Week-to-Week Updating Algorithm to Improve Continuous Glucose Monitoring Performance.

Authors:  Stamatina Zavitsanou; Joon Bok Lee; Jordan E Pinsker; Mei Mei Church; Francis J Doyle; Eyal Dassau
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-10-16

Review 3.  Next-generation, personalised, model-based critical care medicine: a state-of-the art review of in silico virtual patient models, methods, and cohorts, and how to validation them.

Authors:  J Geoffrey Chase; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jennifer L Dickson; Antoine Pironet; Yeong Shiong Chiew; Christopher G Pretty; Geoffrey M Shaw; Balazs Benyo; Knut Moeller; Soroush Safaei; Merryn Tawhai; Peter Hunter; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 4.  Calibration of Minimally Invasive Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors: State-of-The-Art and Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Giada Acciaroli; Martina Vettoretti; Andrea Facchinetti; Giovanni Sparacino
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-13

5.  Limits to the Evaluation of the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems by Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Patrick Schrangl; Florian Reiterer; Lutz Heinemann; Guido Freckmann; Luigi Del Re
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-18

Review 6.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors: Past, Present and Future Algorithmic Challenges.

Authors:  Andrea Facchinetti
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Hypoglycaemia detection and prediction techniques: A systematic review on the latest developments.

Authors:  Omar Diouri; Monika Cigler; Martina Vettoretti; Julia K Mader; Pratik Choudhary; Eric Renard
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.876

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.