GOAL: Minimally invasive continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensors measure in the subcutis a current signal, which is converted into interstitial glucose (IG) concentration by a calibration process periodically updated using fingerstick blood glucose (BG) references. Though important in diabetes management, CGM sensors still suffer from accuracy problems. Here, we propose a new online calibration method improving accuracy of CGM glucose profiles with respect to manufacturer calibration. METHOD: The proposed method fits CGM current signal against the BG references collected twice a day for calibration purposes, by a time-varying calibration function whose parameters are identified in a Bayesian framework using a priori second-order statistical knowledge. The distortion introduced by BG-to-IG kinetics is compensated before parameter identification via nonparametric deconvolution. RESULTS: The method was tested on a database where 108 CGM signals were collected for 7 days by the Dexcom G4 Platinum sensor. Results show the new method drives to a statistically significant accuracy improvement as measured by three commonly used metrics: mean absolute relative difference reduced from 12.73% to 11.47%; percentage of accurate glucose estimates increased from 82.00% to 89.19%; and percentage of values falling in the "A" zone of the Clark error grid increased from 82.22% to 88.86%. CONCLUSION: The new calibration method significantly improves CGM glucose profiles accuracy with respect to manufacturer calibration. SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed algorithm provides a real-time improvement of CGM accuracy, which can be crucial in several CGM-based applications, including the artificial pancreas, thus providing a potential great impact in the diabetes technology research community.
GOAL: Minimally invasive continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensors measure in the subcutis a current signal, which is converted into interstitial glucose (IG) concentration by a calibration process periodically updated using fingerstick blood glucose (BG) references. Though important in diabetes management, CGM sensors still suffer from accuracy problems. Here, we propose a new online calibration method improving accuracy of CGM glucose profiles with respect to manufacturer calibration. METHOD: The proposed method fits CGM current signal against the BG references collected twice a day for calibration purposes, by a time-varying calibration function whose parameters are identified in a Bayesian framework using a priori second-order statistical knowledge. The distortion introduced by BG-to-IG kinetics is compensated before parameter identification via nonparametric deconvolution. RESULTS: The method was tested on a database where 108 CGM signals were collected for 7 days by the Dexcom G4Platinum sensor. Results show the new method drives to a statistically significant accuracy improvement as measured by three commonly used metrics: mean absolute relative difference reduced from 12.73% to 11.47%; percentage of accurate glucose estimates increased from 82.00% to 89.19%; and percentage of values falling in the "A" zone of the Clark error grid increased from 82.22% to 88.86%. CONCLUSION: The new calibration method significantly improves CGM glucose profiles accuracy with respect to manufacturer calibration. SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed algorithm provides a real-time improvement of CGM accuracy, which can be crucial in several CGM-based applications, including the artificial pancreas, thus providing a potential great impact in the diabetes technology research community.
Authors: Stamatina Zavitsanou; Joon Bok Lee; Jordan E Pinsker; Mei Mei Church; Francis J Doyle; Eyal Dassau Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2017-10-16
Authors: J Geoffrey Chase; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jennifer L Dickson; Antoine Pironet; Yeong Shiong Chiew; Christopher G Pretty; Geoffrey M Shaw; Balazs Benyo; Knut Moeller; Soroush Safaei; Merryn Tawhai; Peter Hunter; Thomas Desaive Journal: Biomed Eng Online Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 2.819
Authors: Omar Diouri; Monika Cigler; Martina Vettoretti; Julia K Mader; Pratik Choudhary; Eric Renard Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2021-03-24 Impact factor: 4.876