Literature DB >> 25915880

Accuracy of self-monitored blood pressure for diagnosing hypertension in primary care.

David Nunan1, Matthew Thompson, Carl J Heneghan, Rafael Perera, Richard J McManus, Alison Ward.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of recommendations for self-monitoring blood pressure (BP) for diagnosing hypertension in primary care.
METHODS: Two hundred and forty-seven consecutive participants with raised (≥130 mmHg systolic) BP measured by their general practitioner from four primary care practices in the United Kingdom underwent 28 days of self-monitoring followed by 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Diagnostic accuracy of the first 7 days of self-monitored BP (minimum 4 days, discarding readings on day 1) in detecting hypertension with ambulatory blood pressure was taken as reference.
RESULTS: Two hundred and three participants were included, 109 (53.7%) of whom were diagnosed with hypertension using daytime ambulatory BP. The average of days 2-7 self-monitored BP correctly classified 150 of 203 participants [sensitivity 93.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 87.2-97.4%; specificity 51.1%, 95% CI 40.5-61.5%). However, the average of days 2-5 self-monitoring correctly classified 152 of 203 participants due to better specificity (53.2%, 95% CI 42.6-63.6%). In sensitivity analysis, diagnostic accuracy was not improved by inclusion of readings beyond day 5, and inclusion of readings taken on day 1 had no impact on diagnostic accuracy. Self-monitoring in the clinic was more accurate than readings taken by the general practitioner, but not self-monitoring outside of the clinic.
CONCLUSION: Hypertension can be ruled out in the majority of patients with elevated clinic BP using the average of the first 5 consecutive days of self-monitored BP, supporting lower limits for self-monitoring readings in current guidelines. Performing readings beyond day 5 and including readings taken on the first day had no clinical impact on diagnostic accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25915880     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  12 in total

1.  Trends in the diagnosis and management of hypertension: repeated primary care survey in South West England.

Authors:  Natasha Mejzner; Christopher E Clark; Lindsay Fp Smith; John L Campbell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Acceptability and psychological impact of out-of-office monitoring to diagnose hypertension: an evaluation of survey data from primary care patients.

Authors:  Alice C Tompson; Alison M Ward; Richard J McManus; Rafael Perera; Matthew J Thompson; Carl J Heneghan; David Nunan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Using out-of-office blood pressure measurements in established cardiovascular risk scores: a secondary analysis of data from two blood pressure monitoring studies.

Authors:  Sarah Lay-Flurrie; Richard Stevens; Peter de Leeuw; Abraham Kroon; Sheila Greenfield; Mohammed Mohammed; Paramjit Gill; Willem Verberk; Richard McManus
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Clinic, Home, and Kiosk Blood Pressure Measurements for Diagnosing Hypertension: a Randomized Diagnostic Study.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Melissa L Anderson; Andrea J Cook; Kelly Ehrlich; Yoshio N Hall; Clarissa Hsu; Dwayne Joseph; Predrag Klasnja; Karen L Margolis; Jennifer B McClure; Sean A Munson; Mathew J Thompson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 6.473

5.  Patient experience of home and waiting room blood pressure measurement: a qualitative study of patients with recently diagnosed hypertension.

Authors:  Alice C Tompson; Claire L Schwartz; Susannah Fleming; Alison M Ward; Sheila M Greenfield; Sabrina Grant; Fd Richard Hobbs; Carl J Heneghan; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Blood pressure checks and diagnosing hypertension (BP-CHECK): Design and methods of a randomized controlled diagnostic study comparing clinic, home, kiosk, and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Melissa L Anderson; Jerry Campbell; Andrea J Cook; Kelly Ehrlich; Sarah Evers; Yoshio N Hall; Clarissa Hsu; Dwayne Joseph; Predrag Klasnja; Karen L Margolis; Jennifer B McClure; Sean A Munson; Mathew J Thompson
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Patient use of blood pressure self-screening facilities in general practice waiting rooms: a qualitative study in the UK.

Authors:  Alice C Tompson; Sabrina Grant; Sheila M Greenfield; Richard J McManus; Susannah Fleming; Carl J Heneghan; Fd Richard Hobbs; Alison M Ward
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Patients' and clinicians' views on the optimum schedules for self-monitoring of blood pressure: a qualitative focus group and interview study.

Authors:  Sabrina Grant; James A Hodgkinson; Siobhan L Milner; Una Martin; Alice Tompson; Fd Richard Hobbs; Jonathan Mant; Richard J McManus; Sheila M Greenfield
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 9.  What is the evidence base for diagnosing hypertension and for subsequent blood pressure treatment targets in the prevention of cardiovascular disease?

Authors:  Claire L Schwartz; Richard J McManus
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Clinic (PROOF-BP): Derivation and Validation of a Tool to Improve the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  James P Sheppard; Richard Stevens; Paramjit Gill; Una Martin; Marshall Godwin; Janet Hanley; Carl Heneghan; F D Richard Hobbs; Jonathan Mant; Brian McKinstry; Martin Myers; David Nunan; Alison Ward; Bryan Williams; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 10.190

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.