| Literature DB >> 25915867 |
Bashir Ahmad Fomda1, Asiya Khan1, Manzoor Ahmad Thokar1, Ajaz Ahmad Malik2, Anjum Fazili3, Rayees Ahmad Dar4, Monika Sharma5, Nancy Malla5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Echinococcosis is a human and animal health problem in many endemic areas worldwide. There are numerous reports and hospital-based studies from Kashmir, North India, yet there has been no epidemiological study conducted in Kashmir, the apparently endemic area for human hydatidosis. This study was designed to determine the seroprevalence of hydatid infection in Kashmir Valley and to find out association of risk factors for acquisition of this infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25915867 PMCID: PMC4411056 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124813
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The geographic location of the surveyed population in Jammu and Kashmir, North India.
Right: Map of India, Left up: Kashmir Valley within State of Jammu and Kashmir and Left down: Map of Kashmir Valley showing nine districts where study was conducted.
District and village wise distribution of demographic characteristics and number of seropositive subjects (N = 1429).
| District | Village (Urban or Rural) | No. of subjects studied | Male | Female | Age (Seropositive/Total) | Seropositive/ Total Subjects (%) | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1–15 Years | 16–55 Years | >55 Years | |||||||
| 1. Baramulla | Kripalpora (Rural) | 96 | 48 | 48 | 0/12 | 08/78 | 0/6 | 08/96 (8.33) | |
| Wadoora (Rural) | 47 | 14 | 33 | 0/4 | 01/11 | 02/32 | 03/47 (6.38) | ||
| Nowpora (Rural) | 55 | 22 | 33 | 04/12 | 02/33 | 0/10 | 06/55 (10.91) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 2. Anantnag | Lalan (Rural) | 167 | 68 | 99 | 05/20 | 13/115 | 05/32 | 23/167(13.77) | |
| Bijbehara (Urban) | 46 | 26 | 20 | 0 | 0/34 | 0/12 | 0/46(0) | ||
| Anzwalla (Urban) | 36 | 10 | 26 | 0/28 | 0/8 | 0 | 0/36(0) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 3. Bandipora | Nowgam (Rural) | 172 | 90 | 82 | 05/19 | 08/123 | 01/30 | 14/172 (8.14) | |
| Asham (Rural) | 103 | 55 | 48 | 04/13 | 02/72 | 02/18 | 08/103 (7.77) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 4. Kupwara | Pazipoora (Urban) | 44 | 14 | 30 | 0/5 | 0/29 | 0/10 | 0/44(0) | |
| Chogul (Rural) | 42 | 26 | 16 | 01/10 | 02/30 | 0/2 | 03/42 (7.14) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 5. Budgam | Sozeith (Rural) | 41 | 26 | 15 | 0/8 | 01/27 | 01/6 | 02/41 (4.88) | |
| Kawoosa (Urban) | 32 | 12 | 20 | 0/2 | 02/23 | 0/7 | 02/32 (6.25) | ||
| Mazhoma (Urban) | 49 | 29 | 20 | 0/3 | 0/37 | 0/9 | 0/46(0) | ||
| Manglar (Rural) | 46 | 6 | 40 | 0/2 | 0/37 | 01/7 | 01/46 (2.17) | ||
| Kralwari (Rural) | 106 | 38 | 68 | 0/2 | 0/93 | 0/11 | 0/106(0) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 6. Ganderbal | Tulbagh (Rural) | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0/2 | 0/9 | 0/2 | 0/13 | |
| Wusun (Rural) | 20 | 7 | 13 | 0/1 | 0/14 | 0/5 | 0/20 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 7. Shopian | Babapora (Rural) | 47 | 14 | 33 | 0/3 | 0/41 | 0/3 | 0/47 | |
| Safanagri (Rural) | 66 | 28 | 38 | 0 | 0/50 | 0/16 | 0/66 | ||
| Wachi (Rural) | 76 | 29 | 47 | 0/1 | 0/65 | 0/10 | 0/76 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 8. Pulwama | Ratsun (Rural) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9. Srinagar | Srinagar (Urban) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Fig 2IgG ELISA absorbance (O.D) values.
Serum samples obtained from 100 healthy blood donors (□), 72 positive samples from surveyed population (♦), five positive controls (○), five negative controls (●) and 20 samples from patients with other parasitic diseases (▲).
Association of potential exposure variables with seroprevalence of hydatid infection as determined by univariate analysis.
| Risk Factors | N (Seropositive/total) (%) | RR (95% of CI) | P-value* |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|
| 42/630 (6.6) | 1.831(1.132–2.961) | 0.012 |
|
| 30/799 (3.75) | ||
|
| |||
|
| 70/1161(5.26) | 8.533(2.079–35.020) | <0.001 |
|
| 02/268 (4.59) | ||
|
| |||
|
| 19/148 (5.79) | Reference | |
|
| 41/1015 (4.07) | 3.643 (2.052–6.467) | <0.001 |
|
| 12/266 (3.05) | 3.118 (1.468–6.621) | 0.002 |
|
| |||
|
| 62/965 (6.42) | 3.11 (1.583–6.137) | <0.001 |
|
| 10/464 (2.15) |
Binary logistic regression (Multivariate) analysis of the relationship of exposure variables and seroprevalence of hydatid infection, among the studied population of Kashmir Valley.
| Variable | P-Value | OR (95% of CI) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
|
| 0.001 | 0.314(0.175–0.565) |
|
| 0.008 | 0.355(0.165–0.764) |
|
| ||
|
| 0.015 | 0.544(0.333–0.888) |
|
| ||
|
| 0.002 | 0.338(0.171–0.670) |
|
| ||
|
| 0.005 | 7.680(1.861–31.695) |
Number of serum samples reactive and percentage occurrence by Western blot assay (N = 72).
| S.No | Reactive antigenic fraction (Mol wt in kDa) | Number of reactive samples (Occurrence) | Percentage Occurrence (immunereactivity) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | 4 | 5.6 |
| 2 | 39 | 42 | 58.3 |
| 3 | 52 | 2 | 2.8 |
| 4 | 57 | 52 | 72.2 |
| 5 | 60 | 12 | 16.7 |
| 6 | 63 | 4 | 5.6 |
| 7 | 70 | 48 | 66.7 |
| 8 | 76 | 8 | 11.1 |
| 9 | 94 | 12 | 16.7 |
| 10 | 110 | 6 | 8.3 |
| 11 | 123 | 4 | 5.6 |
| 12 | 134 | 10 | 13.9 |