Literature DB >> 25915676

Comparative evaluation of cranial base and facial morphology of cleft lip and palate patients with normal individuals in cone beam computed tomography.

Arezoo Jahanbin1, Neda Eslami, Hosein Hoseini Zarch, Sepehr Kobravi.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the cranial base and facial morphology of cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients with individuals with no cleft.
METHODS: Thirty-two adult individuals including 9 patients without cleft, 14 patients with unilateral CLP, and 9 patients with bilateral CLP participated in the study. The average age of participants was 18.71 ± 2.1 years. Full skull cone-beam computed tomography of all of the participants was taken. Anatomic landmarks were traced in the midsagittal, coronal, and axial planes, and craniofacial height and width-related parameters were compared among the 3 groups. Analysis of variance and Tukey test were used for comparison. P < 0.05 was considered as significant.
RESULTS: SNA (P = 0.048), SNB (P = 0.005), S-N-Pog (P = 0.007), N-ANS (P = 0.013), and the distance between the most superior points of the external auditory meatus (P = 0.01) were significantly decreased in bilateral CLP compared with the control group. Similarly, SNB (P = 0.013) and S-N-Pog (P = 0.008) were significantly smaller in unilateral cases compared with the controls. S-N to the palatal plane was significantly increased in both unilateral (P = 0.013) and bilateral (P = 0.00) cases compared with individuals with no cleft. However, S-N to the palatal plane significantly increased in bilateral cases compared with unilateral clefts (P = 0.028).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of the current study, adult patients with CLP showed relatively distinctive morphological features in maxillofacial and cranial base regions. It seems that less dysmorphic characteristics are observed in transverse dimensions of the face and basicranium in both types of cleft. On the other hand, lateral cranial base is more affected by CLP compared with the middle basicranium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25915676     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  4 in total

1.  MEMO1 drives cranial endochondral ossification and palatogenesis.

Authors:  Eric Van Otterloo; Weiguo Feng; Kenneth L Jones; Nancy E Hynes; David E Clouthier; Lee Niswander; Trevor Williams
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  Evaluation of mandibular hard and soft tissues in cleft patients.

Authors:  Isil Aras; Derya Baykal; Merve Bulut; Servet Dogan
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2017-04-03

3.  Craniofacial Analysis May Indicate Co-Occurrence of Skeletal Malocclusions and Associated Risks in Development of Cleft Lip and Palate.

Authors:  Denise K Liberton; Payal Verma; Konstantinia Almpani; Peter W Fung; Rashmi Mishra; Snehlata Oberoi; Figen Ç Şenel; James K Mah; John Huang; Bonnie L Padwa; Janice S Lee
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2020-01-28

4.  Timing of Spheno-Occipital Synchondrosis Ossification in Children and Adolescents with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Francisco Vale; Inês Francisco; António Lucas; Ana Roseiro; Francisco Caramelo; Adriana Sobral
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.