| Literature DB >> 25914591 |
Kaori Hirata1, Ryoichi Masuda2, Yasutaka Tsubokura3, Takeshi Yasui2, Tetsuya Yamada2, Koji Takahashi2, Taiko Nagaya2, Takashi Sayama4, Masao Ishimoto4, Makita Hajika2.
Abstract
Boiled seed hardness is an important factor in the processing of soybean food products such as nimame and natto. Little information is available on the genetic basis for boiled seed hardness, despite the wide variation in this trait. DNA markers linked to the gene controlling this trait should be useful in soybean breeding programs because of the difficulty of its evaluation. In this report, quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis was performed to reveal the genetic factors associated with boiled seed hardness using a recombinant inbred line population developed from a cross between two Japanese cultivars, 'Natto-shoryu' and 'Hyoukei-kuro 3', which differ largely in boiled seed hardness, which in 'Natto-shoryu' is about twice that of 'Hyoukei-kuro 3'. Two significantly stable QTLs, qHbs3-1 and qHbs6-1, were identified on chromosomes 3 and 6, for which the 'Hyoukei-kuro 3' alleles contribute to decrease boiled seed hardness for both QTLs. qHbs3-1 also showed significant effects in progeny of a residual heterozygous line and in a different segregating population. Given its substantial effect on boiled seed hardness, SSR markers closely linked to qHbs3-1, such as BARCSOYSSR_03_0165 and BARCSOYSSR_03_0185, could be useful for marker-assisted selection in soybean breeding.Entities:
Keywords: DNA markers; QTL; SSR; boiled seed hardness; marker-assisted selection; soybean
Year: 2014 PMID: 25914591 PMCID: PMC4267311 DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.64.362
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breed Sci ISSN: 1344-7610 Impact factor: 2.086
Fig. 1External appearance of seeds of ‘Natto-shoryu’ and ‘Hyoukei-kuro 3’. Bar indicates 1 cm.
Distribution of phenotypic traits in the parental cultivars and the RIL population in 2010 and 2011
| Trait | Year | Parents | RILs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| Natto-shoryu | Hyoukei-kuro 3 | Range | Mean | CV (%) | ||
| Boiled seed hardness (×105 Pa) | ||||||
| 2010 | 14.6 | 4.9 | 4.7–23.2 | 11.1 | 37.8 | |
| 2011 | 13.2 | 5.2 | 5.1–23.0 | 10.3 | 37.0 | |
| Difference | ** | |||||
| 100-seed weight (g) | ||||||
| 2010 | 10.6 | 66.6 | 13.8–41.5 | 24.3 | 19.4 | |
| 2011 | 11.2 | 61.1 | 15.6–33.3 | 23.6 | 17.2 | |
| Difference | ** | |||||
| Water absorption ratio | ||||||
| 2010 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.1–2.8 | 2.4 | 4.6 | |
| 2011 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.2–2.5 | 2.3 | 3.4 | |
| Difference | ** | |||||
CV coefficient of variation.
** indicates that the values of the two parental cultivars were significantly different at the 1% level (ANOVA).
Fig. 2Frequency distribution of boiled seed hardness in the RIL population planted in 2010 and 2011. White and black arrows indicate the mean of boiled seed hardness for ‘Natto-shoryu’ and ‘Hyoukei-kuro 3’, respectively.
Fig. 3Correlation of boiled seed hardness for the RIL population in two cultivation years (2010 and 2011). “r” is the correlation coefficient value; values that are significant according to a t-test at the 1% significance level are indicated by **.
Detection of QTLs associated with boiled seed hardness, 100-seed weight and water absorption ratio in the RIL population
| Trait | Year | Chromosome | Marker interval flanking QTL peak (marker position cM) | LOD score | Contribution (%) | Additive effect | QTL name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boiled seed hardness | 2010 | 3 | Sct_195 (0.0)–Satt530 (25.9) | 25.0 | 47.4 | 2.94 | |
| 6 | Sat_062 (0.0)–Sat_153 (17.9) | 4.0 | 5.5 | −1.01 | |||
| 6 | Satt277 (49.7)–Satt307 (67.4) | 11.2 | 15.8 | 1.72 | |||
| 2011 | 2 | Sat_135 (64.0)–Satt141 (64.4) | 3.1 | 4.8 | −0.84 | ||
| 3 | Sct_195 (0.0)–Satt530 (25.9) | 20.7 | 44.3 | 2.55 | |||
| 6 | Satt277 (49.7)–Satt307 (67.4) | 6.8 | 11.6 | 1.32 | |||
| 100 seed-weight | 2010 | 17 | Sat_284 (0.0)–CSSR172 (16.8) | 4.6 | 16.5 | −1.93 | |
| 2011 | 6 | Sat_213 (36.7)–Sat_076 (43.9) | 3.2 | 7.8 | −1.15 | ||
| 6 | Satt277 (49.7)–Satt100 (54.8) | 3.2 | 7.8 | −1.15 | |||
| 17 | Sat_284 (0.0)–CSSR172 (16.8) | 7.3 | 23.4 | −2.01 | |||
| Water absorption ratio | 2010 | 5 | Satt545 (88.7)–Satt211 (110.4) | 5.0 | 14.2 | −0.04 | |
| 12 | Sat_218 (4.2)–Satt442 (7.6) | 3.0 | 8.3 | −0.03 | |||
| 2011 | 5 | Satt545 (88.7)–Satt211 (110.4) | 7.2 | 24.1 | −0.04 | ||
| 12 | Satt666 (0.0)–GMES0816 (9.5) | 3.2 | 8.0 | 0.02 |
LOD scores were calculated by CIM. QTL significance was estimated with a 1000-fold permutation test at 3.0 for boiled seed hardness in both years, 2.9 and 3.1 for 100-seed weight in 2010 and 2011, respectively, and 2.9 and 3.0 for water absorption ratio in 2010 and 2011, respectively.
Additive effect of ‘Natto-shoryu’ allele.
Comparison of boiled seed hardness for the RHL progeny and the F2 population showing segregation of the qHbs3-1 genotype
| Parents or population | Genotype at | Number of plants | Boiled seed hardness (×105 Pa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| RHL progeny | |||
| P1: Natto-shoryu | 8 | 17.1 ± 0.5 | |
| P2: Hyoukei-kuro 3 | 8 | 8.5 ± 0.3 | |
| Natto-shoryu | 20 | 20.8 ± 0.3 | |
| Hyoukei-kuro 3 | 20 | 13.1 ± 0.3 | |
| Difference | *** | ||
| F2 population | |||
| P1: Kanto-115 | 1 | 14.5 | |
| P2: Hyoukei-kuro 3 | 2 | 6.4 ± 0.3 | |
| Kanto-115 | 9 | 16.8 ± 0.7 | |
| Hyoukei-kuro 3 | 7 | 9.3 ± 0.9 | |
| Difference | *** | ||
Allelic type for qHbs3-1 is based on the genotype of markers BARCSOYSSR_03_0172 and BARCSOYSSR_03_0175 for the RHL progeny, and BARCSOYSSR_03_0165 and BARCSOYSSR_03_0185 for the F2 population.
*** indicates that the values for the P1-genotype group differed significantly from those of the P2-genotype group at the 0.1% level (t-test).
Fig. 4Schematic illustration of genotypes in the qHbs3-1 region of the RHL selected from the RIL population and the RHL progeny. White, black and gray bars indicate ‘Natto-shoryu’-type, ‘Hyoukei-kuro 3’-type and heterozygous genotypes, respectively.