| Literature DB >> 25914347 |
Dankmar Böhning1, Kalliopi Mylona1, Alan Kimber1.
Abstract
Meta-analysis of rare event studies has recently become a subject of controversy and debate. We will argue and demonstrate in this paper that the occurrence of zero events in clinical trials or cohort studies, even if zeros occur in both arms (the case of a double-zero trial), is less problematic, at least from a statistical perspective, if the available statistical tools are applied in the appropriate way. In particular, it is neither necessary nor advisable to exclude studies with zero events from the meta-analysis. In terms of statistical tools, we will focus here on Mantel-Haenszel techniques, mixed Poisson regression and related regression models.Keywords: Mantel-Haenszel estimation; Meta-analysis; Poisson regression with random effects; Rare event analysis; Zero and double-zero studies
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25914347 DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201400184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biom J ISSN: 0323-3847 Impact factor: 2.207