Literature DB >> 25914347

Meta-analysis of clinical trials with rare events.

Dankmar Böhning1, Kalliopi Mylona1, Alan Kimber1.   

Abstract

Meta-analysis of rare event studies has recently become a subject of controversy and debate. We will argue and demonstrate in this paper that the occurrence of zero events in clinical trials or cohort studies, even if zeros occur in both arms (the case of a double-zero trial), is less problematic, at least from a statistical perspective, if the available statistical tools are applied in the appropriate way. In particular, it is neither necessary nor advisable to exclude studies with zero events from the meta-analysis. In terms of statistical tools, we will focus here on Mantel-Haenszel techniques, mixed Poisson regression and related regression models.
© 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Keywords:  Mantel-Haenszel estimation; Meta-analysis; Poisson regression with random effects; Rare event analysis; Zero and double-zero studies

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25914347     DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201400184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biom J        ISSN: 0323-3847            Impact factor:   2.207


  16 in total

1.  Multivariate meta-analysis with an increasing number of parameters.

Authors:  Simina M Boca; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Joshua N Sampson
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.207

2.  Fibrinogen concentrate in surgery.

Authors:  Giuseppe Marano; Carlo Mengoli; Massimo Franchini; Stefania Vaglio; Sara Gentili; Simonetta Pupella; Giancarlo M Liumbruno
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Meta-analysis of rare adverse events in randomized clinical trials: Bayesian and frequentist methods.

Authors:  Hwanhee Hong; Chenguang Wang; Gary L Rosner
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Variational Disentanglement for Rare Event Modeling.

Authors:  Zidi Xiu; Chenyang Tao; Michael Gao; Connor Davis; Benjamin A Goldstein; Ricardo Henao
Journal:  Proc Conf AAAI Artif Intell       Date:  2021-05-18

5.  Is It Necessary to Perform the Pharmacological Interventions for Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Jie Zhou; Sheng Zhang; Xu-Lin Wang; Yu-Long Jia; Shu He; Yuan-Yuan Wang; Wen-Chao Li; Jian-Guo Shao; Xun Zhuang; Yuan-Lin Liu; Gang Qin
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 6.  Impact of impaired fractional flow reserve after coronary interventions on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mathias Wolfrum; Gregor Fahrni; Giovanni Luigi de Maria; Guido Knapp; Nick Curzen; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Georg M Fröhlich; Adrian P Banning
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.298

7.  A comparison of seven random-effects models for meta-analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Martin Law; Theo Stijnen; Wolfgang Viechtbauer; Ian R White
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Methods for evidence synthesis in the case of very few studies.

Authors:  Ralf Bender; Tim Friede; Armin Koch; Oliver Kuss; Peter Schlattmann; Guido Schwarzer; Guido Skipka
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 5.273

Review 9.  Efficacy and safety of azithromycin in Covid-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Ahmed M Kamel; Mona S A Monem; Nour A Sharaf; Nada Magdy; Samar F Farid
Journal:  Rev Med Virol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 11.043

10.  Utilization of the evidence from studies with no events in meta-analyses of adverse events: an empirical investigation.

Authors:  Chang Xu; Xiaoqin Zhou; Liliane Zorzela; Ke Ju; Luis Furuya-Kanamori; Lifeng Lin; Cuncun Lu; Omran A H Musa; Sunita Vohra
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.