Literature DB >> 25914303

Analysis of risk factors for flap loss and salvage in free flap head and neck reconstruction.

Edward I Chang1, Hong Zhang1, Jun Liu1, Peirong Yu1, Roman J Skoracki1, Matthew M Hanasono1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk factors and techniques for free flap salvage in head and neck reconstruction are poorly described.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all head and neck free flaps performed from 2000 to 2010.
RESULTS: Overall, 151 of 2296 flaps (6.6%) underwent salvage for microvascular complications. Age, comorbidities, surgeon experience (p = .88), vein grafts, and supercharging (p = .45) did not affect flap salvage. Muscle-only flaps (p = .002) were associated with significantly worse outcomes. Coupled venous anastomoses were superior to handsewn anastomoses (p = .03). Arteriovenous thrombosis had worse outcomes than a venous or arterial thrombosis alone (p < .0001). Anticoagulation, thrombolytics, and thrombectomy did not improve survival. Multiple takebacks (p = .003) and late takebacks (>3 days) had significantly worse outcomes (p = .003). Flap salvage was 60.3% successful with 60 total flap losses (2.6%).
CONCLUSION: Although flap salvage should be attempted, multiple attempts are not recommended, especially for muscle-only flaps. Combined arteriovenous and late thrombosis has a dismal prognosis regardless of different salvage techniques.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E771-E775, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  free flap salvage; free flap success; free flap thrombosis; head and neck reconstruction; microvascular complication

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25914303     DOI: 10.1002/hed.24097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  10 in total

1.  Fibula Free Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction: Identifying Risk Factors for Flap Failure and Analysis of Postoperative Complications in a Low Volume Setting.

Authors:  Pieter-Jan Verhelst; Flore Dons; Pieter-Jan Van Bever; Joseph Schoenaers; Lloyd Nanhekhan; Constantinus Politis
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2018-06-05

2.  Influence of coupler size on revision rate and timing of revision after free flap tissue transfer in the head and neck.

Authors:  Ulrich Kisser; Christine Adderson-Kisser; Philipp Baumeister; Maximilian Reiter
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  An Important Role of Macrophages for Wound Margin Regeneration in a Murine Flap Model.

Authors:  Jeon Yeob Jang; Yoo Seob Shin; Ho-Ryun Won; Chorong Seo; Hye-Young Lee; Jin Roh; Chul-Ho Kim
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 4.169

4.  Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in salvage reconstruction following free flap failure in head and neck cancer surgery.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Yongsheng Qiu; Qigen Fang; Yingping Jia
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Meta-analysis of arterial anastomosis techniques in head and neck free tissue transfer.

Authors:  Yu-Jing Wang; Xiu-Ling Wang; Shan Jin; Ran Zhang; Yu-Qin Gao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Autologous Mandible Reconstruction in a Hypercoagulable Patient following Multiple Failed Free Flaps.

Authors:  Mark A Maier; Richard F Guidry; Patrick A Palines; Mark W Stalder
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-01-21

7.  Multidisciplinary Practice Variations of Anti-Thrombotic Strategies for Free Tissue Transfers.

Authors:  Minh N Q Huynh; Vinai Bhagirath; Michael Gupta; Ronen Avram; Kevin Cheung
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 0.558

8.  Use of Indocyanine Green Fluorescent Imaging in the Assessment of a Tongue Flap After Lateral Hemiglossectomy.

Authors:  Lisandro Montorfano; Stephen J Bordes; Ryan Azarkhail; Mauricio Sarmiento Cobos; Michael Medina
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-05-26

Review 9.  Is obesity a predisposing factor for free flap failure and complications? Comparison between breast and nonbreast reconstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jin Yong Shin; Si-Gyun Roh; Nae-Ho Lee; Kyung-Moo Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Wound monitoring of pH and oxygen in patients after radiation therapy.

Authors:  Steffen Auerswald; Stephan Schreml; Robert Meier; Alexandra Blancke Soares; Maximilian Niyazi; Sebastian Marschner; Claus Belka; Martin Canis; Frank Haubner
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.481

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.