Literature DB >> 2591426

Prognostic parameters in renal cell carcinoma--a new approach.

S Störkel1, W Thoenes, G H Jacobi, R Lippold.   

Abstract

The prognostic potential of the parameters TNM staging, Robson staging, grading, cell type, growth pattern, and patient age was investigated for 431 patients with operated renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In the individual analyses, staging and grading attained the best results, whereby Robson staging proved to be superior to TNM staging by comparison. Morphological parameters had a more modest effect on the prognosis, but this should not be underestimated. A scale of points based on a comparative biometric evaluation of the various parameters was devised. From this scale, three significantly distinct prognostic groups evolved with a correct prognosis of over 80% on the average for an individual case. In comparison with other proposals for assessing prognosis for RCCs, the suggested scale of points had the greatest prognostic potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2591426     DOI: 10.1159/000471633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  13 in total

1.  [The WHO/ISUP grading system for renal carcinoma].

Authors:  H Moch
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 2.  Tumors of the kidney, ureter, and bladder.

Authors:  W A See; R D Williams
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-05

3.  Concomitant deregulation of HIF1alpha and cell cycle proteins in VHL-mutated renal cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Derek John Atkins; Christian Gingert; Christina Justenhoven; Gerd Emil Schmahl; Marcellus Stephanus Bonato; Hiltrud Brauch; Stephan Störkel
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Ultrastructural appearance and cytoskeletal architecture of the clear, chromophilic, and chromophobe types of human renal cell carcinoma in vitro.

Authors:  C D Gerharz; R Moll; S Störkel; U Ramp; W Thoenes; H E Gabbert
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 5.  Reproducibility and reliability of tumor grading in urological neoplasms.

Authors:  Rainer Engers
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  [Renal cell carcinoma. Comparative analysis of the prognostic significance of the WHO-classification and the Störkel's prognostic score].

Authors:  S Gunia; M May; K Korb; P Stosiek
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Establishment and characterization of two divergent cell lines derived from a human chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  C D Gerharz; R Moll; S Störkel; U Ramp; B Hildebrandt; G Molsberger; P Koldovsky; H E Gabbert
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 8.  [Classification of renal cell carcinoma/tumors and their relationship to the nephron-collecting tubules system].

Authors:  W Thoenes; H J Rumpelt; S Störkel
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1990-11-16

9.  Differential radiologic characteristics of renal tumours on multiphasic computed tomography.

Authors:  Boon Chye Ching; Hui Shan Tan; Puay Hoon Tan; Chee Keong Toh; Ravindran Kanesvaran; Quan Sing Ng; Min Han Tan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 1.858

10.  Systematic comparative protein expression profiling of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a pilot study based on the separation of tissue specimens by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  Rudolf Lichtenfels; Sven P Dressler; Monica Zobawa; Christian V Recktenwald; Angelika Ackermann; Derek Atkins; Michael Kersten; Andrea Hesse; Maria Puttkammer; Friedrich Lottspeich; Barbara Seliger
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.