Literature DB >> 25914241

Notch signaling promotes osteoclast maturation and resorptive activity.

Jason W Ashley1, Jaimo Ahn1, Kurt D Hankenson2,3.   

Abstract

The role of Notch signaling in osteoclast differentiation is controversial with conflicting experimental evidence indicating both stimulatory and inhibitory roles. Differences in experimental protocols and in vivo versus in vitro models may explain the discrepancies between studies. In this study, we investigated cell autonomous roles of Notch signaling in osteoclast differentiation and function by altering Notch signaling during osteoclast differentiation using stimulation with immobilized ligands Jagged1 or Delta-like1 or by suppression with γ-secretase inhibitor DAPT or transcriptional inhibitor SAHM1. Stimulation of Notch signaling in committed osteoclast precursors resulted in larger osteoclasts with a greater number of nuclei and resorptive activity whereas suppression resulted in smaller osteoclasts with fewer nuclei and suppressed resorptive activity. Conversely, stimulation of Notch signaling in osteoclast precursors prior to induction of osteoclastogenesis resulted in fewer osteoclasts. Our data support a mechanism of context-specific Notch signaling effects wherein Notch stimulation inhibits commitment to osteoclast differentiation, but enhances the maturation and function of committed precursors.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone resorption; Notch signaling; Osteoclast commitment; Osteoclast fusion; Osteoclasts

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25914241      PMCID: PMC4565736          DOI: 10.1002/jcb.25205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biochem        ISSN: 0730-2312            Impact factor:   4.429


  38 in total

Review 1.  Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development.

Authors:  S Artavanis-Tsakonas; M D Rand; R J Lake
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-04-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Presenilin-dependent ErbB4 nuclear signaling regulates the timing of astrogenesis in the developing brain.

Authors:  S Pablo Sardi; Joshua Murtie; Samir Koirala; Brooke A Patten; Gabriel Corfas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Notch is activated in RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation and resorption.

Authors:  Li Duan; Paul de Vos; Mingwen Fan; Yijin Ren
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2008-05-01

Review 4.  RANKing intracellular signaling in osteoclasts.

Authors:  Xu Feng
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.885

5.  C-terminal fragment of presenilin is the molecular target of a dipeptidic gamma-secretase-specific inhibitor DAPT (N-[N-(3,5-difluorophenacetyl)-L-alanyl]-S-phenylglycine t-butyl ester).

Authors:  Yuichi Morohashi; Toshiyuki Kan; Yusuke Tominari; Haruhiko Fuwa; Yumiko Okamura; Naoto Watanabe; Chihiro Sato; Hideaki Natsugari; Tohru Fukuyama; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Taisuke Tomita
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  TAK1-dependent signaling requires functional interaction with TAB2/TAB3.

Authors:  Arnaud Besse; Betty Lamothe; Alejandro D Campos; William K Webster; Upendra Maddineni; Su-Chang Lin; Hao Wu; Bryant G Darnay
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  NOTCH1 regulates osteoclastogenesis directly in osteoclast precursors and indirectly via osteoblast lineage cells.

Authors:  Shuting Bai; Raphael Kopan; Wei Zou; Matthew J Hilton; Chin-tong Ong; Fanxin Long; F Patrick Ross; Steven L Teitelbaum
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV (CaMKIV) enhances osteoclast differentiation via the up-regulation of Notch1 protein stability.

Authors:  Yun-Hee Choi; Eun-Jung Ann; Ji-Hye Yoon; Jung-Soon Mo; Mi-Yeon Kim; Hee-Sae Park
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-10-23

9.  Osteoclast culture and resorption assays.

Authors:  Elizabeth W Bradley; Merry Jo Oursler
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2008

10.  A conserved face of the Jagged/Serrate DSL domain is involved in Notch trans-activation and cis-inhibition.

Authors:  Jemima Cordle; Steven Johnson; Joyce Zi Yan Tay; Pietro Roversi; Marian B Wilkin; Beatriz Hernández de Madrid; Hideyuki Shimizu; Sacha Jensen; Pat Whiteman; Boquan Jin; Christina Redfield; Martin Baron; Susan M Lea; Penny A Handford
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 15.369

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Notch and the regulation of osteoclast differentiation and function.

Authors:  Jungeun Yu; Ernesto Canalis
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Notch signaling inhibition protects against LPS mediated osteolysis.

Authors:  Peeyush N Goel; Alexander J Egol; Yasaman Moharrer; Beatrix Brandfield-Harvey; Jaimo Ahn; Jason W Ashley
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 3.  Contextual Regulation of Skeletal Physiology by Notch Signaling.

Authors:  Daniel W Youngstrom; Kurt D Hankenson
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 4.  Notch Signaling and the Skeleton.

Authors:  Stefano Zanotti; Ernesto Canalis
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 19.871

5.  Protease-Activated Receptor 1 Deletion Causes Enhanced Osteoclastogenesis in Response to Inflammatory Signals through a Notch2-Dependent Mechanism.

Authors:  Sandra Jastrzebski; Judith Kalinowski; Sehwan Mun; Bongjin Shin; Naga Suresh Adapala; Christian E Jacome-Galarza; Faryal Mirza; H Leonardo Aguila; Hicham Drissi; Archana Sanjay; Ernesto Canalis; Sun-Kyeong Lee; Joseph A Lorenzo
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  The Notch Ligand Jagged1 Regulates the Osteoblastic Lineage by Maintaining the Osteoprogenitor Pool.

Authors:  Rialnat A Lawal; Xichao Zhou; Kaylind Batey; Corey M Hoffman; Mary A Georger; Freddy Radtke; Matthew J Hilton; Lianping Xing; Benjamin J Frisch; Laura M Calvi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Suppression of Notch Signaling in Osteoclasts Improves Bone Regeneration and Healing.

Authors:  Peeyush N Goel; Yasaman Moharrer; John H Hebb; Alexander J Egol; Gurpreet Kaur; Kurt D Hankenson; Jaimo Ahn; Jason W Ashley
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Knockdown of DANCR reduces osteoclastogenesis and root resorption induced by compression force via Jagged1.

Authors:  Xiaoge Zhang; Yanli Zhao; Zhihe Zhao; Xinguang Han; Yangxi Chen
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 9.  Tissue engineered bone mimetics to study bone disorders ex vivo: Role of bioinspired materials.

Authors:  Yuru Vernon Shih; Shyni Varghese
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Stimulation of Notch Signaling in Mouse Osteoclast Precursors.

Authors:  Gurpreet Kaur; Jaimo Ahn; Kurt D Hankenson; Jason W Ashley
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.