| Literature DB >> 25914238 |
Paul Ryan1,2, Heidi Furlong3, Conleth G Murphy4, Finbarr O'Sullivan5, Thomas N Walsh3, Fergus Shanahan6, Gerald C O'Sullivan2,7.
Abstract
We have previously reported that most patients with esophagogastric cancer (EGC) undergoing potentially curative resections have bone marrow micrometastases (BMM). We present 10-year outcome data of patients with EGC whose rib marrow was examined for micrometastases and correlate the findings with treatment and conventional pathologic tumor staging. A total of 88 patients with localized esophagogastric tumors had radical en-bloc esophagectomy, with 47 patients receiving neoadjuvant (5-fluorouracil/cisplatin based) chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and the remainder being treated with surgery alone. Rib marrow was examined for cytokeratin-18-positive cells. Standard demographic and pathologic features were recorded and patients were followed for a mean 10.04 years. Disease recurrences and all deaths in the follow-up period were recorded. No patients were lost to follow-up. 46 EGC-related and 10 non-EGC-related deaths occurred. Multivariate Cox analysis of interaction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, nodal status, and BMM positivity showed that the contribution of BMM to disease-specific and overall survival is significant (P = 0.014). There is significant interaction with neoadjvant CRT (P < 0.005), and lymph node positivity (P < 0.001) but BMM positivity contributes to increase in risk of cancer-related death in patients treated with either CRT or surgery alone. Bone marrow micrometastases detected at the time of surgery for EGC is a long-term prognostic marker. Detection is a readily available, technically noncomplex test which offers a window on the metastatic process and a refinement of pathologic staging and is worthy of routine consideration.Entities:
Keywords: 10-year follow-up; bone marrow micrometastases; esophagogastric cancer
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25914238 PMCID: PMC4559039 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.470
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Med ISSN: 2045-7634 Impact factor: 4.452
Patient and tumor characteristics with respect to micrometastasis (MM) detection
| Surgery alone ( | Chemoradiation + surgery ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MM positive | MM negative | MM positive | MM negative | |||
| Mean age (years) | 61.6 | 61.5 | N.S. | 60.1 | 58.1 | N.S. |
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 18 (67) | 12 (86) | 0.35 | 14 (70) | 22 (81) | 0.56 |
| Female | 9 (33) | 2 (14) | 6 (30) | 5 (19) | ||
| Histologic type | ||||||
| Adenocarcinoma | 20 (74) | 12 (86) | 0.64 | 12 (60) | 22 (81) | 0.19 |
| Squamous | 7 (26) | 2 (14) | 8 (40) | 5 (19) | ||
| Nodal status | ||||||
| Node negative | 6 (22) | 3 (21) | 1.00 | 7 (35) | 13 (48) | 0.55 |
| Node positive | 21 (78) | 11 (79) | 13 (65) | 14 (52) | ||
| Stage | ||||||
| 0–1 | 1 (4) | 2 (14) | 0.55 | 5 (25) | 7 (26) | 1.00 |
| 2–3 | 26 (96) | 12 (86) | 15 (75) | 27 (74) | ||
Outcome at 10-years in relation to treatment and micrometastasis
| Alive | BMM positive | All deaths (OS) | BMM positive | OGC deaths (DSS) | BMM positive |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surgery, | 8 (20) | 3/8 (37%) | 33 (80) | 24/33 (73%) | 23 (56) | 17/23 (74%) | 0.02 |
| CRT + surgery, | 13 (28) | 6/13 (46%) | 34 (72) | 14/34 (41%) | 23 (49) | 10/23 (43%) | N.S. |
| Total, | 21 (24) | 9/21 (43%) | 67 (76) | 38/67 (57%) | 46 (52) | 27/46 (59%) | N.S. |
Figure 1Disease-specific survival with respect to node and micrometastasis status in chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery alone groups: univariate analysis shows lymph node positivity (red) separates low- and high-risk groups in both patient groups; bone marrow micrometastasis positivity (red) separates low- and high-risk groups in surgery alone but not CRT patients.
Univariate analysis: disease-free survival
| Variable | HR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cell type | |||
| Squamous | 1.09 | 0.64–1.87 | 0.75 |
| Adenocarcinoma | |||
| Nodal status | |||
| Negative | |||
| Positive | 2.32 | 1.33–4.06 | 0.003 |
| Micromet status | |||
| Negative | |||
| Positive | 1.22 | 0.75–1.98 | 0.42 |
| Treatment | |||
| SO | |||
| CRT | 0.91 | 0.56–1.47 | 0.69 |
Figure 2Overall (all-cause) survival, Kaplan–Meier curves: red— bone marrow micrometastases (BMM) positive; black— BMM negative.
Univariate analysis: overall survival
| Variable | HR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cell type | |||
| Squamous | 1.12 | 0.65–1.93 | 0.68 |
| Adenocarcinoma | |||
| Nodal status | |||
| Negative | |||
| Positive | 2.30 | 1.31–4.02 | 0.004 |
| Micromet status | |||
| Negative | |||
| Positive | 1.24 | 0.76–2.01 | 0.39 |
| Treatment | |||
| SO | |||
| CRT | 0.94 | 0.58–1.52 | 0.80 |
Cox’s regression (multivariate) analysis: disease-free survival
| Variable | HR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micromet positive | 2.17 | 1.17–4.00 | 0.014 |
| Node and CRT positive | 0.30 | 0.13–0.68 | 0.004 |
| Micromet and CRT positive | 3.24 | 1.70–6.20 | 0.0003 |
Cox’s regression (multivariate) analysis: overall survival
| Variable | HR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micromet positive | 2.17 | 1.17–4.02 | 0.014 |
| Node and CRT positive | 0.30 | 0.13–0.69 | 0.005 |
| Micromet and CRT positive | 3.39 | 1.77–6.49 | 0.0002 |
Figure 3AIC model analysis of interaction between bone marrow micrometastasis and nodal status in risk of disease-specific survival: blue lines— surgery alone, red lines—chemoradiotherapy (CRT) + surgery; 0—node negative, 1—node positive. The contribution to risk of Esophagogastric cancer (EGC)-related death is increased with bone marrow micrometastases (BMM) positivity in both node-positive and node-negative surgery alone and CRT patients.