Literature DB >> 25913904

Aggressive Intrinsic Subtypes in Breast Cancer: A Predictor of Guideline Adherence in Older Patients With Breast Cancer?

Florian Ebner1, Katharina Hancke2, Maria Blettner3, Lukas Schwentner2, Achim Wöckel4, Rolf Kreienberg2, Wolfgang Janni2, Reyn van Ewijk5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment side effects, comorbidities, and guideline-adherent treatment (GL+) influence the oncologic outcome of older breast cancer patients (oBCP) (age ≥ 70 years). The focus of this analysis was to investigate the associations among tumor characteristics, guideline adherence, and outcome and to compare these associations between younger breast cancer patients (yBCP) (age 50-69 years) and oBCP.
METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study with 17 participating certified breast cancer centers. The analysis of 10,897 patient records collected from 1992 to 2008 for GL+ and clinical outcome was performed. Tumor and patient characteristics and their associations with GL+ were compared between oBCP and yBCP.
RESULTS: Nonguideline-adherent treatment (GL-) was associated with higher tumor stages and comorbidities. This effect was stronger in the oBCP group (P < .001). GL+ was significantly more common in yBCP than in oBCP (P < .001). The oBCP had significantly higher tumor stages, including tumor size (P < .001), nodal status (P < .001), and positive hormone receptors (P = .001). Tumor grading was lower (P = .001), and HER2neu overexpression was less frequent (P = .003) in oBCP. Overall survival and disease-free survival are significantly impaired if GL- occurred in patients with breast cancer independently of age.
CONCLUSIONS: GL- is associated with decreased disease-free survival and overall survival in both age groups. GL+ decreases advanced tumor characteristics in all age groups but significantly more in oBCP. If patients received GL+, we were unable to detect a statistical significant difference in the survival parameters.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Guideline adherence; Guideline violations; Guideline-adherent treatment; Older breast cancer patient

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25913904     DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2015.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the treatment of cancers in Australia and the factors associated with adherence: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Mia Bierbaum; Frances Rapport; Gaston Arnolda; Yvonne Tran; Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig; Kristiana Ludlow; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Healthcare providers' adherence to breast cancer guidelines in Europe: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Ena Niño de Guzmán; Yang Song; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Carlos Canelo-Aybar; Luciana Neamtiu; Elena Parmelli; Javier Pérez-Bracchiglione; Montserrat Rabassa; David Rigau; Zuleika Saz Parkinson; Iván Solà; Adrián Vásquez-Mejía; Ignacio Ricci-Cabello
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Clinicians' attitudes and perceived barriers and facilitators to cancer treatment clinical practice guideline adherence: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative literature.

Authors:  Mia Bierbaum; Frances Rapport; Gaston Arnolda; Brona Nic Giolla Easpaig; Klay Lamprell; Karen Hutchinson; Geoff P Delaney; Winston Liauw; Richard Kefford; Ian Olver; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Clinicians' attitudes to oncology clinical practice guidelines and the barriers and facilitators to adherence: a mixed methods study protocol.

Authors:  Mia Bierbaum; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Gaston Arnolda; Geoffrey P Delaney; Winston Liauw; Richard Kefford; Yvonne Tran; Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig; Frances Rapport
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Adherence to breast cancer guidelines is associated with better survival outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies in EU countries.

Authors:  Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Adrián Vásquez-Mejía; Carlos Canelo-Aybar; Ena Niño de Guzman; Javier Pérez-Bracchiglione; Montserrat Rabassa; David Rigau; Ivan Solà; Yang Song; Luciana Neamtiu; Elena Parmelli; Zuleika Saz-Parkinson; Pablo Alonso-Coello
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.