Literature DB >> 25913873

Elevated light levels in schools have a protective effect on myopia.

Wen-Juan Hua1, Ju-Xiang Jin, Xiao-Yan Wu, Ji-Wen Yang, Xuan Jiang, Guo-Peng Gao, Fang-Biao Tao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether elevated light levels in classrooms in rural areas can protect school-age children from myopia onset or myopia progression.
METHODS: A total of 317 subjects from 1713 eligible students aged six to 14 in four schools located in northeast China participated in the study. Students received a comprehensive eye examination including cycloplegic refraction and ocular biometry, which included axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and corneal curvature (CC) measurement, and completed a questionnaire. The intervention arm included 178 students in two schools with rebuilt elevated lighting systems and the control arm included 139 students in which lighting systems were unchanged. Results for the two arms were compared with a Wilcoxon rank sum test, a chi-squared test or a t-test, as appropriate. Factors that might help explain any differences were explored with multivariate linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: The median average illuminance of blackboards and desks and uniformity of desk lighting were significantly improved, however, the uniformity of blackboard lighting declined after intervention. At baseline, the mean refraction, AL, CC, ACD and myopia prevalence between the two arms were not significantly different. After 1 year, compared with the control arm the intervention arm had a lower incidence of new myopia onset (4% vs 10%; p = 0.029), a smaller decrease in refractive error among no myopic subjects (-0.25 dioptre [D] vs -0.47 D; p = 0.001), and shorter axial growth for both non-myopic (0.13 vs 0.18 mm; p = 0.023) and myopic subjects (0.20 vs 0.27 mm; p = 0.0001). Multivariate linear regression analysis showed the intervention program, lower hyperopic baseline refraction, lower father's education level, longer time sleeping and less time in screen-viewing activities were associated with less refractive shift in the direction of myopia in non-myopic children. For myopic subjects, myopia progression was significantly associated with family income only. The intervention program and older age had a protective effect on axial growth for both myopic and non-myopic subjects. The father's education level and sleep duration were significantly associated with axial growth in non-myopic children.
CONCLUSIONS: Elevated light levels in classrooms have a significant effect on myopia onset, decreases in refraction, and axial growth; if the findings of lighting intervention are reproduced in future studies, the ambient light levels in schools should be improved.
© 2015 The Authors Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2015 The College of Optometrists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  children; environment; light; myopia; schools

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25913873     DOI: 10.1111/opo.12207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  26 in total

Review 1.  Stopping the rise of myopia in Asia.

Authors:  Lothar Spillmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Electrical responses from human retinal cone pathways associate with a common genetic polymorphism implicated in myopia.

Authors:  Xiaofan Jiang; Zihe Xu; Talha Soorma; Ambreen Tariq; Taha Bhatti; Alexander J Baneke; Nikolas Pontikos; Shaun M Leo; Andrew R Webster; Katie M Williams; Christopher J Hammond; Pirro G Hysi; Omar A Mahroo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Effects of low intensity ambient lighting on refractive development in infant rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Zhihui She; Li-Fang Hung; Baskar Arumugam; Krista M Beach; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Loss of Gap Junction Delta-2 (GJD2) gene orthologs leads to refractive error in zebrafish.

Authors:  Wim H Quint; Kirke C D Tadema; Erik de Vrieze; Rachel M Lukowicz; Sanne Broekman; Beerend H J Winkelman; Melanie Hoevenaars; H Martijn de Gruiter; Erwin van Wijk; Frank Schaeffel; Magda Meester-Smoor; Adam C Miller; Rob Willemsen; Caroline C W Klaver; Adriana I Iglesias
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-03

5.  Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walline; Kristina B Lindsley; S Swaroop Vedula; Susan A Cotter; Donald O Mutti; Sueko M Ng; J Daniel Twelker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-13

6.  The effects of reduced ambient lighting on lens compensation in infant rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Zhihui She; Li-Fang Hung; Baskar Arumugam; Krista M Beach; Earl L Smith Iii
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 1.984

7.  Pilot study of a novel classroom designed to prevent myopia by increasing children's exposure to outdoor light.

Authors:  Zhongqiang Zhou; Tingting Chen; Mengrui Wang; Ling Jin; Yongyi Zhao; Shangji Chen; Congyao Wang; Guoshan Zhang; Qilin Wang; Qiaoming Deng; Yubo Liu; Ian G Morgan; Mingguang He; Yizhi Liu; Nathan Congdon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Near Work Related Behaviors Associated with Myopic Shifts among Primary School Students in the Jiading District of Shanghai: A School-Based One-Year Cohort Study.

Authors:  Xiaofang You; Ling Wang; Hui Tan; Xiangui He; Xiaomei Qu; Huijing Shi; Jianfeng Zhu; Haidong Zou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Decreased sleep quality in high myopia children.

Authors:  Masahiko Ayaki; Hidemasa Torii; Kazuo Tsubota; Kazuno Negishi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Development of Experimental Myopia in Chicks in a Natural Environment.

Authors:  Richard A Stone; Yuval Cohen; Alice M McGlinn; Sherrill Davison; Susan Casavant; James Shaffer; Tejvir S Khurana; Machelle T Pardue; P Michael Iuvone
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.