Literature DB >> 25913279

Operative results of keyhole supracerebellar-infratentorial approach to the pineal region.

Phillip A Bonney1, Lillian B Boettcher1, Ahmed A Cheema1, Adrian J Maurer1, Michael E Sughrue2.   

Abstract

The supracerebellar-infratentorial approach to the pineal region is typically accomplished with a craniotomy that extends to at least the rim of the foramen magnum. Minimally invasive techniques that limit the inferior extent of the craniotomy have been described for this approach but, to our knowledge, no operative results have been published demonstrating the feasibility and safety of such techniques. We present a series of patients who underwent surgical resection of pineal region lesions using the minimally invasive method at our institution. Clinical, radiologic, and operative data were prospectively collected on patients treated for lesions of the pineal region by the senior author from January 2012 to July 2014. Seven patients were identified. The sitting position was employed in each patient. Keyhole craniotomies were limited to a maximum diameter of 2.5 cm. Adequate working corridors were attained, and in no patient was resection limited by the exposure. No neurological or systemic complications were seen in the perioperative and early follow-up periods. In this feasibility study, we demonstrate that it is not necessary to extend a craniotomy inferiorly to the rim of the foramen magnum in order to gain access to the pineal region via relaxation of the cerebellum. The same surgical goals can be safely accomplished with a smaller craniotomy.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Keyhole; Minimally invasive; Pineal region; Sitting position; Supracerebellar infratentorial

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25913279     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.12.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  6 in total

1.  Surgical Management of Falcotentorial Junction Tumors: A Case Series Report.

Authors:  Peixi Liu; Xiaowen Wang; Yingjun Liu; Jiajun Cai; Zixiao Yang; Kai Quan; Wei Zhu; Jianping Song
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 2.  What is the risk of venous cerebellar infarction in the supracerebellar infratentorial approach?

Authors:  Martin Smrcka; Ondrej Navratil
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Pineal region glioblastomas display features of diffuse midline and non-midline gliomas.

Authors:  Randy S D'Amico; George Zanazzi; Peter Wu; Peter Canoll; Jeffrey N Bruce
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  A Superior Cerebellar Convexity Two-Part Craniotomy to Access the Paramedian Supra and Infratentorial Space: Technical Note.

Authors:  Tene Cage; Arnau Benet; John Golfinos; Michael W McDermott
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-06-30

5.  Keyhole Surgery of Pineal Area Tumors - Personal Experience in 22 Patients.

Authors:  Zbigniew Kotwica; Agnieszka Saracen; Piotr Kasprzak
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 1.757

Review 6.  International expert consensus statement about methods and indications for keyhole microneurosurgery from International Society on Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Qing Lan; Michael Sughrue; Nikolai J Hopf; Kentaro Mori; Jaechan Park; Hugo Andrade-Barazarte; Mangaleswaran Balamurugan; Macro Cenzato; Giovanni Broggi; Dezhi Kang; Kenichiro Kikuta; Yuanli Zhao; Hengzhu Zhang; Shinsuke Irie; Yuping Li; Boon Seng Liew; Yoko Kato
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.042

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.