Sridhayan Mahalingam1, Aadarsh Shah2, Andrew Stewart3. 1. Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Wrythe Lane, Carshalton SM5 1AA, United Kingdom. Electronic address: smahalingam@doctors.org.uk. 2. North Middlesex University Hospital, Sterling Way, London N18 1QX, United Kingdom. 3. Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Wrythe Lane, Carshalton SM5 1AA, United Kingdom.
Abstract
INTRO/ OBJECTIVE: Atypical Fibroxanthoma (AFX) is a rare cutaneous neoplasm arising from myofibroblast or fibroblast-like cells that predominantly affects the head and neck region. It commonly mimics more invasive neoplasms and is a diagnostic challenge to clinicians. The aim of this study was to develop a better understanding of AFX, focusing on recent developments in diagnosis and management. METHODS: A retrospective case series and review of recent literature were carried out. RESULTS: Over a 17-year period, seven cases were identified (six male, mean age at presentation was 75.9 years). Two patients underwent complete excision and five patients had curettage and cauterisation. Two patients developed local recurrence but none demonstrated signs suggestive of metastatic spread. Histologically all seven lesions displayed a spindle cell pattern. Where performed, immunohistochemical staining was positive for Vimentin, CD10, CD68 and actin, and negative for CAM 5.2, CD34, Melan-A, S100 protein, HMB45, Cytokeratin A1/A3. CONCLUSION: Our patient demographics, histopathology and immunohistochemistry are comparable to previous studies. Although advances have been made in immunohistochemical analysis, we are yet to discover a specific diagnostic immunostain for AFX. Clinical findings should therefore be correlated with histology and a panel of immunohistochemical stains should be used. Given the potential for recurrence or metastases, Moh's Micrographic Surgery with regular follow-up may be the preferred management.
INTRO/ OBJECTIVE:Atypical Fibroxanthoma (AFX) is a rare cutaneous neoplasm arising from myofibroblast or fibroblast-like cells that predominantly affects the head and neck region. It commonly mimics more invasive neoplasms and is a diagnostic challenge to clinicians. The aim of this study was to develop a better understanding of AFX, focusing on recent developments in diagnosis and management. METHODS: A retrospective case series and review of recent literature were carried out. RESULTS: Over a 17-year period, seven cases were identified (six male, mean age at presentation was 75.9 years). Two patients underwent complete excision and five patients had curettage and cauterisation. Two patients developed local recurrence but none demonstrated signs suggestive of metastatic spread. Histologically all seven lesions displayed a spindle cell pattern. Where performed, immunohistochemical staining was positive for Vimentin, CD10, CD68 and actin, and negative for CAM 5.2, CD34, Melan-A, S100 protein, HMB45, Cytokeratin A1/A3. CONCLUSION: Our patient demographics, histopathology and immunohistochemistry are comparable to previous studies. Although advances have been made in immunohistochemical analysis, we are yet to discover a specific diagnostic immunostain for AFX. Clinical findings should therefore be correlated with histology and a panel of immunohistochemical stains should be used. Given the potential for recurrence or metastases, Moh's Micrographic Surgery with regular follow-up may be the preferred management.