Literature DB >> 25912303

For society, state and self: juggling the logics of professionalism in general practice appraisal.

Tom Entwistle1, Elaine Matthews2.   

Abstract

Sociologists repeatedly appeal to notions of altruism, bureaucratisation and self interest in their efforts to explain the changing place of the professions in contemporary society. We treat these three readings as institutional logics that are key to understanding the way in which doctors respond to the appraisal system at the heart of the UK's approach to revalidation. Our analysis of a survey of 998 general practitioners (GPs) working in Wales finds an altruistic commitment to learning and improvement, bureaucratic demands for reporting information and self-regarding resentment of changes in the occupational package provided by general practice. But the data also demonstrate that the maintenance of the appraisal regime is dependent on the preparedness and capacity of individual GPs to do micro-level institutional work on all fronts.
© 2015 Foundation for the Sociology of Health & Illness.

Keywords:  general practice; policy analysis; professions and professionalisation; social constructionism

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25912303     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Health Illn        ISSN: 0141-9889


  3 in total

1.  Yonder: Appraisal, district nurses, problem gambling, and Nora Batty.

Authors:  Ahmed Rashid
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  The general practitioner workforce crisis in England: a qualitative study of how appraisal and revalidation are contributing to intentions to leave practice.

Authors:  Jeremy Dale; Rachel Potter; Katherine Owen; Jonathan Leach
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  Policing the profession? Regulatory reform, restratification and the emergence of Responsible Officers as a new locus of power in UK medicine.

Authors:  Marie Bryce; Kayleigh Luscombe; Alan Boyd; Abigail Tazzyman; John Tredinnick-Rowe; Kieran Walshe; Julian Archer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 4.634

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.