Literature DB >> 25912254

A comparison of radial and femoral access for cardiac catheterization.

John F Wagener1, Sunil V Rao2.   

Abstract

Over the past several years, the transradial approach (TRA) for cardiac catheterization has become increasingly adopted in the United States. The increased utilization of the TRA is grounded on 2 decades of research, showing reduced bleeding and vascular complications to complement improved patient quality of life. However, the concern over cost, radiation exposure, and acknowledged "learning curve" has kept the transfemoral approach (TFA) the mainstay of most US catheterization laboratories. More recent larger multi-centered randomized studies have aimed to address outcomes and these concerns between the TR and TF approaches. This article will review the changing trends in TRA in the US, discuss clinical (bleeding and mortality) and non-clinical (quality of life and cost) outcomes from recent randomized studies, and finally discuss certain aspects when it comes to adopting TRA.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25912254     DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2015.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med        ISSN: 1050-1738            Impact factor:   6.677


  2 in total

1.  MDCT angiography of emergent, non-traumatic, upper extremity vascular lesions.

Authors:  Sameer Ahmed; Megan H Lee; Hannah Ahn; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Kevin I Duan; Christian D Helfrich; Sunil V Rao; Emily L Neely; Christine A Sulc; Diana Naranjo; Edwin S Wong
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-10-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.