Pamela J Bradshaw1, Paul Stobie2, Matthew W Knuiman3, Thomas G Briffa3, Michael S T Hobbs3. 1. School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, Australia. Electronic address: pamela.bradshaw@uwa.edu.au. 2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Australia. 3. School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Research suggests that survival among the recipients of a cardiac permanent pacemaker (PPM) matches the age- and sex-matched general population in the absence of cardiovascular disease. We used linked administrative data to examine life expectancy-based outcomes for adults requiring a cardiac PPM. METHODS: Population-level hospital admissions data were used to identify all recipients of an initial PPM during 1995-2008. Expected years of additional life remaining at the time of implantation were calculated for each patient from population life tables. Observed years were calculated using linked mortality data to end 2011. Cox regression was used to determine demographic and clinical predictors of survival. RESULTS: In 8757 patients age-adjusted risk of death to 5 years was associated with male sex, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score (excluding cardiac disease), a history of heart failure, cardiomyopathy or atrial fibrillation and emergency admission. Coronary revascularisation surgery reduced long-term risk. The observed/expected ratio of additional years of life was 0.80 for men and 0.84 for women overall, varying from 0.92 for women without significant comorbidity to 0.40 for patients with the highest Charlson score and cardiomyopathy. The oldest patients (80-99 years) did relatively well, probably reflecting patient selection. Heart disease was the most frequent cause of death. CONCLUSIONS: Life expectancy among PPM recipients without significant comorbidity approached that of the general population. Greater non-cardiac comorbidity, heart failure, atrial fibrillation and, in particular, cardiomyopathy, contributed most to the loss of expected years of life in all age groups. The oldest patients and women did relatively well.
INTRODUCTION: Research suggests that survival among the recipients of a cardiac permanent pacemaker (PPM) matches the age- and sex-matched general population in the absence of cardiovascular disease. We used linked administrative data to examine life expectancy-based outcomes for adults requiring a cardiac PPM. METHODS: Population-level hospital admissions data were used to identify all recipients of an initial PPM during 1995-2008. Expected years of additional life remaining at the time of implantation were calculated for each patient from population life tables. Observed years were calculated using linked mortality data to end 2011. Cox regression was used to determine demographic and clinical predictors of survival. RESULTS: In 8757 patients age-adjusted risk of death to 5 years was associated with male sex, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score (excluding cardiac disease), a history of heart failure, cardiomyopathy or atrial fibrillation and emergency admission. Coronary revascularisation surgery reduced long-term risk. The observed/expected ratio of additional years of life was 0.80 for men and 0.84 for women overall, varying from 0.92 for women without significant comorbidity to 0.40 for patients with the highest Charlson score and cardiomyopathy. The oldest patients (80-99 years) did relatively well, probably reflecting patient selection. Heart disease was the most frequent cause of death. CONCLUSIONS: Life expectancy among PPM recipients without significant comorbidity approached that of the general population. Greater non-cardiac comorbidity, heart failure, atrial fibrillation and, in particular, cardiomyopathy, contributed most to the loss of expected years of life in all age groups. The oldest patients and women did relatively well.
Authors: Maciej Dębski; Mateusz Ulman; Andrzej Ząbek; Krzysztof Boczar; Kazimierz Haberka; Marcin Kuniewicz; Jacek Lelakowski; Barbara Małecka Journal: Cardiol J Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 2.737
Authors: Maria Polikandrioti; Konstantinos Tzirogiannis; Sofia Zyga; Ioannis Koutelekos; Georgios Vasilopoulos; Paraskevi Theofilou; George Panoutsopoulos Journal: Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis Date: 2018-02-05
Authors: Tuomas Kerola; Antti Eranti; Aapo L Aro; M Anette Haukilahti; Arttu Holkeri; M Juhani Junttila; Tuomas V Kenttä; Harri Rissanen; Eric Vittinghoff; Paul Knekt; Markku Heliövaara; Heikki V Huikuri; Gregory M Marcus Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-05-03
Authors: Abdolreza Rajaeefard; Mohammad Ghorbani; Mohammad Ali Babaee Baigi; Hamidreza Tabatabae Journal: Iran Red Crescent Med J Date: 2015-11-14 Impact factor: 0.611
Authors: Martin Riesenhuber; Andreas Spannbauer; Friedrich Rauscha; Herwig Schmidinger; Adelinde Boszotta; Thomas Pezawas; Christoph Schukro; Marianne Gwechenberger; Günter Stix; Anahit Anvari; Thomas Wrba; Cesar Khazen; Martin Andreas; Günther Laufer; Christian Hengstenberg; Mariann Gyöngyösi Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2020-09-22
Authors: Roman Załuska; Anna Milewska; Anastasius Moumtzoglou; Marcin Grabowski; Wojciech Drygas Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2021-12-13 Impact factor: 2.430