Literature DB >> 25911601

Using Dual Beta Distributions to Create "Proper" ROC Curves Based on Rating Category Data.

Douglas Mossman1, Hongying Peng2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis helps investigators quantify and describe how well a diagnostic system discriminates between 2 mutually exclusive conditions. The conventional binormal (CvB) curve-fitting model usually produces ROCs that are improper in that they do not have the ever-decreasing slope required by signal detection theory. When data sets evaluated under the CvB model have hooks, the resulting ROCs can contain misleading information about the diagnostic performance of the method at low and high false positive rates.
OBJECTIVE: To present and evaluate a dual beta (DB) ROC model that assumes diagnostic data arise from 2 β distributions. The DB model's parameter constraints assure that the resulting ROC curve has a positive, monotonically decreasing slope. DESIGN/
METHOD: Computer simulation study comparing results from CvB, DB, and weighted power function (WPF) models.
RESULTS: The DB model produces results that are as good as or better than those from the WPF model, and less biased and closer to the true values than curves obtained using the CvB model.
CONCLUSIONS: The DB ROC model expresses the relationship between the false positive rate and true positive rate in closed form and allows for quick ROC area calculations using spreadsheet functions. Because it posits simple relationships among the decision axis, operating points, and model parameters, the DB model offers investigators a flexible, easy-to-grasp ROC form that is simpler to implement than other proper ROC models.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Keywords:  binormal assumption; distribution; proper ROC; receiver operating characteristic; β

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25911601     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X15582210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  1 in total

1.  Calibration of medical diagnostic classifier scores to the probability of disease.

Authors:  Weijie Chen; Berkman Sahiner; Frank Samuelson; Aria Pezeshk; Nicholas Petrick
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.021

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.