Literature DB >> 25911600

An Efficient Estimator for the Expected Value of Sample Information.

Nicolas A Menzies1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conventional estimators for the expected value of sample information (EVSI) are computationally expensive or limited to specific analytic scenarios. I describe a novel approach that allows efficient EVSI computation for a wide range of study designs and is applicable to models of arbitrary complexity.
METHODS: The posterior parameter distribution produced by a hypothetical study is estimated by reweighting existing draws from the prior distribution. EVSI can then be estimated using a conventional probabilistic sensitivity analysis, with no further model evaluations and with a simple sequence of calculations (Algorithm 1). A refinement to this approach (Algorithm 2) uses smoothing techniques to improve accuracy. Algorithm performance was compared with the conventional EVSI estimator (2-level Monte Carlo integration) and an alternative developed by Brennan and Kharroubi (BK), in a cost-effectiveness case study.
RESULTS: Compared with the conventional estimator, Algorithm 2 exhibited a root mean square error (RMSE) 8%-17% lower, with far fewer model evaluations (3-4 orders of magnitude). Algorithm 1 produced results similar to those of the conventional estimator when study evidence was weak but underestimated EVSI when study evidence was strong. Compared with the BK estimator, the proposed algorithms reduced RSME by 18%-38% in most analytic scenarios, with 40 times fewer model evaluations. Algorithm 1 performed poorly in the context of strong study evidence. All methods were sensitive to the number of samples in the outer loop of the simulation.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithms remove two major challenges for estimating EVSI--the difficulty of estimating the posterior parameter distribution given hypothetical study data and the need for many model evaluations to obtain stable and unbiased results. These approaches make EVSI estimation feasible for a wide range of analytic scenarios.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EVSI; decision theory; research design; value of information

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25911600     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X15583495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  14 in total

1.  The Curve of Optimal Sample Size (COSS): A Graphical Representation of the Optimal Sample Size from a Value of Information Analysis.

Authors:  Eric Jutkowitz; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Karen M Kuntz; Hawre Jalal
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Value of Information Analysis in Models to Inform Health Policy.

Authors:  Christopher H Jackson; Gianluca Baio; Anna Heath; Mark Strong; Nicky J Welton; Edward C F Wilson
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 7.917

3.  Calculating the Expected Value of Sample Information in Practice: Considerations from 3 Case Studies.

Authors:  Anna Heath; Natalia Kunst; Christopher Jackson; Mark Strong; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Gianluca Baio; Nicolas A Menzies; Hawre Jalal
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Implementing Generalized Additive Models to Estimate the Expected Value of Sample Information in a Microsimulation Model: Results of Three Case Studies.

Authors:  Dustin J Rabideau; Pamela P Pei; Rochelle P Walensky; Amy Zheng; Robert A Parker
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Probabilistic threshold analysis by pairwise stochastic approximation for decision-making under uncertainty.

Authors:  Takashi Goda; Yuki Yamada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Value of Information: Sensitivity Analysis and Research Design in Bayesian Evidence Synthesis.

Authors:  Christopher Jackson; Anne Presanis; Stefano Conti; Daniela De Angelis
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Computing the Expected Value of Sample Information Efficiently: Practical Guidance and Recommendations for Four Model-Based Methods.

Authors:  Natalia Kunst; Edward C F Wilson; David Glynn; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Gianluca Baio; Alan Brennan; Michael Fairley; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Chris Jackson; Hawre Jalal; Nicolas A Menzies; Mark Strong; Howard Thom; Anna Heath
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 5.725

8.  Value of Information Analysis Informing Adoption and Research Decisions in a Portfolio of Health Care Interventions.

Authors:  Haitham W Tuffaha; Louisa G Gordon; Paul A Scuffham
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2016-07-07

9.  A systematic review of health economic evaluations of proton beam therapy for adult cancer: Appraising methodology and quality.

Authors:  David A Jones; Joel Smith; Xue W Mei; Maria A Hawkins; Tim Maughan; Frank van den Heuvel; Thomas Mee; Karen Kirkby; Norman Kirkby; Alastair Gray
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-10-31

10.  Multilevel and Quasi Monte Carlo Methods for the Calculation of the Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information.

Authors:  Wei Fang; Zhenru Wang; Michael B Giles; Chris H Jackson; Nicky J Welton; Christophe Andrieu; Howard Thom
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.