Nicolas A Menzies1. 1. Department of Global Health and Population and the Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard University, Boston, MA (NAM) nmenzies@hsph.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Conventional estimators for the expected value of sample information (EVSI) are computationally expensive or limited to specific analytic scenarios. I describe a novel approach that allows efficient EVSI computation for a wide range of study designs and is applicable to models of arbitrary complexity. METHODS: The posterior parameter distribution produced by a hypothetical study is estimated by reweighting existing draws from the prior distribution. EVSI can then be estimated using a conventional probabilistic sensitivity analysis, with no further model evaluations and with a simple sequence of calculations (Algorithm 1). A refinement to this approach (Algorithm 2) uses smoothing techniques to improve accuracy. Algorithm performance was compared with the conventional EVSI estimator (2-level Monte Carlo integration) and an alternative developed by Brennan and Kharroubi (BK), in a cost-effectiveness case study. RESULTS: Compared with the conventional estimator, Algorithm 2 exhibited a root mean square error (RMSE) 8%-17% lower, with far fewer model evaluations (3-4 orders of magnitude). Algorithm 1 produced results similar to those of the conventional estimator when study evidence was weak but underestimated EVSI when study evidence was strong. Compared with the BK estimator, the proposed algorithms reduced RSME by 18%-38% in most analytic scenarios, with 40 times fewer model evaluations. Algorithm 1 performed poorly in the context of strong study evidence. All methods were sensitive to the number of samples in the outer loop of the simulation. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithms remove two major challenges for estimating EVSI--the difficulty of estimating the posterior parameter distribution given hypothetical study data and the need for many model evaluations to obtain stable and unbiased results. These approaches make EVSI estimation feasible for a wide range of analytic scenarios.
BACKGROUND: Conventional estimators for the expected value of sample information (EVSI) are computationally expensive or limited to specific analytic scenarios. I describe a novel approach that allows efficient EVSI computation for a wide range of study designs and is applicable to models of arbitrary complexity. METHODS: The posterior parameter distribution produced by a hypothetical study is estimated by reweighting existing draws from the prior distribution. EVSI can then be estimated using a conventional probabilistic sensitivity analysis, with no further model evaluations and with a simple sequence of calculations (Algorithm 1). A refinement to this approach (Algorithm 2) uses smoothing techniques to improve accuracy. Algorithm performance was compared with the conventional EVSI estimator (2-level Monte Carlo integration) and an alternative developed by Brennan and Kharroubi (BK), in a cost-effectiveness case study. RESULTS: Compared with the conventional estimator, Algorithm 2 exhibited a root mean square error (RMSE) 8%-17% lower, with far fewer model evaluations (3-4 orders of magnitude). Algorithm 1 produced results similar to those of the conventional estimator when study evidence was weak but underestimated EVSI when study evidence was strong. Compared with the BK estimator, the proposed algorithms reduced RSME by 18%-38% in most analytic scenarios, with 40 times fewer model evaluations. Algorithm 1 performed poorly in the context of strong study evidence. All methods were sensitive to the number of samples in the outer loop of the simulation. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithms remove two major challenges for estimating EVSI--the difficulty of estimating the posterior parameter distribution given hypothetical study data and the need for many model evaluations to obtain stable and unbiased results. These approaches make EVSI estimation feasible for a wide range of analytic scenarios.
Authors: Christopher H Jackson; Gianluca Baio; Anna Heath; Mark Strong; Nicky J Welton; Edward C F Wilson Journal: Annu Rev Stat Appl Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 7.917
Authors: Anna Heath; Natalia Kunst; Christopher Jackson; Mark Strong; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Gianluca Baio; Nicolas A Menzies; Hawre Jalal Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Dustin J Rabideau; Pamela P Pei; Rochelle P Walensky; Amy Zheng; Robert A Parker Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Natalia Kunst; Edward C F Wilson; David Glynn; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Gianluca Baio; Alan Brennan; Michael Fairley; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Chris Jackson; Hawre Jalal; Nicolas A Menzies; Mark Strong; Howard Thom; Anna Heath Journal: Value Health Date: 2020-05-27 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: David A Jones; Joel Smith; Xue W Mei; Maria A Hawkins; Tim Maughan; Frank van den Heuvel; Thomas Mee; Karen Kirkby; Norman Kirkby; Alastair Gray Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2019-10-31
Authors: Wei Fang; Zhenru Wang; Michael B Giles; Chris H Jackson; Nicky J Welton; Christophe Andrieu; Howard Thom Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 2.583