Literature DB >> 25911456

The diagnostic accuracy of the squeeze test to identify arthritis: a cross-sectional cohort study.

W B van den Bosch1, L Mangnus1, M Reijnierse2, T W J Huizinga1, A H M van der Helm-van Mil1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In daily practice, the squeeze test is used to screen for arthritis in metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints. This cross-sectional cohort study determined the diagnostic accuracy of this test.
METHODS: Patients referred with arthralgia of recent onset that had either a clinical suspicion for progression to arthritis or clinically apparent arthritis were studied. The main outcome was swelling at physical examination of ≥1 MCP or MTP joint. Joint inflammation detected at extremity MRI was the secondary outcome.
RESULTS: Both at MCP and MTP joints, a positive squeeze test associated with swollen joints (p<0.005). The sensitivity of the test at the MCP joints was 53%, specificity 82%, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) 3.0, negative likelihood ratio (LR-) 0.6 and area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) 0.68. At the MTP joints, the sensitivity was 54%, specificity 74%, LR+ 2.1, LR- 0.6 and AUC 0.64. With MRI-detected inflammation as outcome, the sensitivity and specificity were 39% and 86% and 31% and 69% for the test at the MCP and MTP joints, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A positive squeeze test is associated with local joint inflammation but the sensitivity is low, indicating a high percentage of swollen joints with a negative squeeze test. When the test is used on its own, it is insufficient to detect early arthritis. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early Rheumatoid Arthritis; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Rheumatoid Arthritis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25911456     DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-207202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  6 in total

1.  Do rheumatologists know how to squeeze? Evaluations of Gaenslen´s maneuver.

Authors:  David Vega-Morales; Jorge Antonio Esquivel-Valerio; Mario Alberto Garza-Elizondo
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 2.  The value of MRI for detecting subclinical joint inflammation in clinically suspect arthralgia.

Authors:  Anna M P Boeren; Edwin H G Oei; Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2022-07

3.  An algorithm for the classification of study designs to assess diagnostic, prognostic and predictive test accuracy in systematic reviews.

Authors:  Tim Mathes; Dawid Pieper
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-03

4.  Which inflamed tissues explain a positive metatarsophalangeal squeeze test? A large imaging study to clarify a common diagnostic procedure.

Authors:  Bastiaan T van Dijk; Yousra J Dakkak; Doortje I Krijbolder; D Jendé van Zeben; Ilja Tchetverikov; Monique Reijnierse; Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 7.046

5.  Development and validation of a clinical rule for recognition of early inflammatory arthritis.

Authors:  Robin M Ten Brinck; Bastiaan T van Dijk; Hanna W van Steenbergen; Saskia le Cessie; Mattijs E Numans; Samantha L Hider; Christian Mallen; Annette van der Helm-van Mil
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The value of the squeeze test for detection of subclinical synovitis in patients with arthralgia suspicious for progression to RA.

Authors:  Fenne Wouters; Ellis Niemantsverdriet; Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 7.580

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.