Literature DB >> 25911426

Sample preparation with solid phase microextraction and exhaustive extraction approaches: Comparison for challenging cases.

Ezel Boyacı1, Ángel Rodríguez-Lafuente1, Krzysztof Gorynski2, Fatemeh Mirnaghi3, Érica A Souza-Silva1, Dietmar Hein4, Janusz Pawliszyn5.   

Abstract

In chemical analysis, sample preparation is frequently considered the bottleneck of the entire analytical method. The success of the final method strongly depends on understanding the entire process of analysis of a particular type of analyte in a sample, namely: the physicochemical properties of the analytes (solubility, volatility, polarity etc.), the environmental conditions, and the matrix components of the sample. Various sample preparation strategies have been developed based on exhaustive or non-exhaustive extraction of analytes from matrices. Undoubtedly, amongst all sample preparation approaches, liquid extraction, including liquid-liquid (LLE) and solid phase extraction (SPE), are the most well-known, widely used, and commonly accepted methods by many international organizations and accredited laboratories. Both methods are well documented and there are many well defined procedures, which make them, at first sight, the methods of choice. However, many challenging tasks, such as complex matrix applications, on-site and in vivo applications, and determination of matrix-bound and free concentrations of analytes, are not easily attainable with these classical approaches for sample preparation. In the last two decades, the introduction of solid phase microextraction (SPME) has brought significant progress in the sample preparation area by facilitating on-site and in vivo applications, time weighted average (TWA) and instantaneous concentration determinations. Recently introduced matrix compatible coatings for SPME facilitate direct extraction from complex matrices and fill the gap in direct sampling from challenging matrices. Following introduction of SPME, numerous other microextraction approaches evolved to address limitations of the above mentioned techniques. There is not a single method that can be considered as a universal solution for sample preparation. This review aims to show the main advantages and limitations of the above mentioned sample preparation approaches and the applicability and capability of each technique for challenging cases such as complex matrices, on-site applications and automation.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Complex matrices/challenging compounds; Liquid–liquid extraction; On-site/in vivo analysis; Sample preparation; Solid phase extraction; Solid phase microextraction

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25911426     DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.12.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chim Acta        ISSN: 0003-2670            Impact factor:   6.558


  13 in total

1.  Covalent triazine-based framework-grafted functionalized fibrous silica sphere as a solid-phase microextraction coating for simultaneous determination of fenthion and chlorpyrifos by ion mobility spectrometry.

Authors:  Maryam Heydari; Mohammad T Jafari; Mohammad Saraji; Roozbeh Soltani; Mohammad Dinari
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 5.833

Review 2.  Quantitative mass spectrometry methods for pharmaceutical analysis.

Authors:  Glenn Loos; Ann Van Schepdael; Deirdre Cabooter
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  The Influence of Ionic Liquids on the Effectiveness of Analytical Methods Used in the Monitoring of Human and Veterinary Pharmaceuticals in Biological and Environmental Samples-Trends and Perspectives.

Authors:  Natalia Treder; Tomasz Bączek; Katarzyna Wychodnik; Justyna Rogowska; Lidia Wolska; Alina Plenis
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Electrochemical exfoliation of pencil graphite for preparation of graphene coating as a new versatile SPME fiber for determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by gas chromatography.

Authors:  Razieh Zakerian; Soleiman Bahar
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 5.833

5.  Determination of volatile organic compounds exhaled by cell lines derived from hematological malignancies.

Authors:  Hongxia Tang; Yan Lu; Lulu Zhang; Zhonghui Wu; Xiaofang Hou; Hailong Xia
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 6.  Advanced Solid-Phase Microextraction Techniques and Related Automation: A Review of Commercially Available Technologies.

Authors:  Stefano Dugheri; Nicola Mucci; Giovanni Cappelli; Lucia Trevisani; Alessandro Bonari; Elisabetta Bucaletti; Donato Squillaci; Giulio Arcangeli
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 2.193

7.  Extraction and Identification of a Wide Range of Microplastic Polymers in Soil and Compost.

Authors:  Franja Prosenc; Pia Leban; Urška Šunta; Mojca Bavcon Kralj
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.329

8.  High-throughput analysis using non-depletive SPME: challenges and applications to the determination of free and total concentrations in small sample volumes.

Authors:  Ezel Boyacı; Barbara Bojko; Nathaly Reyes-Garcés; Justen J Poole; Germán Augusto Gómez-Ríos; Alexandre Teixeira; Beate Nicol; Janusz Pawliszyn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Rapid Characterization and Discovery of Chemical Markers for Discrimination of Xanthii Fructus by Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Hayoung Kim; Youngae Jung; So Hyeon Jeon; Geum-Sook Hwang; Yun Gyong Ahn
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 10.  Pre-Concentration and Analysis of Mycotoxins in Food Samples by Capillary Electrophoresis.

Authors:  Raffaella Colombo; Adele Papetti
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.