Literature DB >> 25911390

Arthroscopic Suture Anchor Fixation of Bony Bankart Lesions: Clinical Outcome, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results, and Return to Sports.

Johannes E Plath1, Matthias J Feucht2, Robert Bangoj3, Frank Martetschläger3, Klaus Wörtler4, Gernot Seppel3, Mohamed Aboalata5, Thomas Tischer6, Andreas B Imhoff3, Stephan Vogt7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome, return to sporting activity, and postoperative articular cartilage and bony morphology of shoulders that underwent arthroscopic suture anchor repair of bony Bankart lesions.
METHODS: The inclusion criteria for this retrospective study were anterior glenoid rim fractures after traumatic shoulder instability that were treated with arthroscopic suture anchor repair. Patients were surveyed by a questionnaire including sport-specific outcome, Rowe score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, and Oxford Instability Score. Three-tesla magnetic resonance imaging could be performed in 30 patients to assess osseous integration, glenoid reconstruction, and signs of osteoarthritis.
RESULTS: From November 1999 to April 2010, 81 patients underwent an anterior bony Bankart repair in our department (50 arthroscopic suture anchor repairs, 5 arthroscopic screw fixations, and 26 open repairs). The 55 arthroscopic repairs comprised a consecutive cohort of patients treated by a single surgeon. Of the 50 patients in the suture anchor group, 45 (90%) were available for evaluation. At 82 ± 31 months postoperatively, the mean Rowe score was 85.9 ± 20.5 points, the mean Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score was 89.4% ± 14.7%, and the mean Oxford Instability Score was 13.6 ± 5.4 points. Compared with the contralateral shoulder, all scores showed a significantly reduced outcome (P < .001, P < .001, and P < .001, respectively). A redislocation occurred in 3 patients (6.6%). Regarding satisfaction, 35 patients (78%) were very satisfied, 9 (20%) were satisfied, and 1 was partly satisfied. Overall, 95% of patients returned to any sporting activity after surgery. The number of sports disciplines (P < .001), duration (P = .005), level (P = .02), and risk category (P = .013) showed a significant reduction compared with the pretrauma condition. However, only 19% of patients reported that shoulder complaints were the reason for the reduction in activity. Nonunion occurred in 16.6%, with a higher frequency in patients with chronic lesions (P = .031). Anatomic reduction was achieved in 72%, the medial step-off in patients with nonanatomic reduction averaged 1.8 ± 0.9 mm, and the remaining glenoid defect size averaged 6.8% ± 7.3%. Full-thickness cartilage defects of the anterior glenoid were detected in 70% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic suture anchor repair may enable an anatomic reduction of bony Bankart lesions with no or only minimal articular steps and provides successful midterm outcomes concerning clinical scores, recurrence, and patient satisfaction. The return to activity is limited for various, mostly non-shoulder-related causes. Chronic lesions may have an inferior healing potential; therefore early surgical stabilization of acute Bankart fragments is suggested to avoid possible nonunion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Copyright © 2015 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25911390     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnostics and treatment concepts for anteroinferior shoulder instability : Current trends].

Authors:  F Martetschläger; M Tauber; P Habermeyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Bony Bankart lesions and glenoid defects : From refixation techniques to bony augmentation].

Authors:  V Rausch; M Königshausen; J Geßmann; T A Schildhauer; D Seybold
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Patients' expectations of shoulder instability repair.

Authors:  Johannes E Plath; Tim Saier; Matthias J Feucht; Philipp Minzlaff; Gernot Seppel; Sepp Braun; Daniel Hatch; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Modified Double-Row and Double-Pulley Technique for the Treatment of Type Ia Scapular Glenoid Fractures.

Authors:  Yizhong Wang; Qingxian Li; Qingsong Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 5.  Evolving Concepts in the Management of Shoulder Instability.

Authors:  Steven F DeFroda; Allison K Perry; Blake M Bodendorfer; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 6.  Return to Play Following Shoulder Stabilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marc N Ialenti; Jeffrey D Mulvihill; Max Feinstein; Alan L Zhang; Brian T Feeley
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-14

7.  All-Arthroscopic Treatment of Glenoid Rim Fractures.

Authors:  Grigorios Avramidis; Emmanouil Brilakis; Anastasios Deligeorgis; Emmanouil Antonogiannakis
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-09-19

Review 8.  Return-to-Sport Criteria After Upper Extremity Surgery in Athletes-A Scoping Review, Part 1: Rotator Cuff and Shoulder Stabilization Procedures.

Authors:  Rebecca Griffith; Nickolas Fretes; Ioanna K Bolia; Iain R Murray; John Meyer; Alexander E Weber; Seth C Gamradt; Frank A Petrigliano
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-08-06

9.  Natural History of Anterior Shoulder Instability.

Authors:  Eduardo Palma Carpinteiro; Andre Aires Barros
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-08-31

10.  Arthroscopic Transosseous Suture Button Fixation Technique for Treatment of Large Anterior Glenoid Fracture.

Authors:  Arasch Wafaisade; Thomas R Pfeiffer; Maurice Balke; Daniel Guenther; Paola Koenen
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-10-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.