Nicholas Lau1, Paloma Sales2, Sheigla Averill2, Fiona Murphy2, Sye-Ok Sato2, Sheigla Murphy2. 1. Centre for Substance Abuse Studies, Institute for Scientific Analysis, 390 Fourth Street, Second Floor, Suite D, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA. Electronic address: nlau13@gmail.com. 2. Centre for Substance Abuse Studies, Institute for Scientific Analysis, 390 Fourth Street, Second Floor, Suite D, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cannabis use is becoming more accepted in mainstream society. In this paper, we use Zinberg's classic theoretical framework of drug, set, and setting to elucidate how older adult cannabis users managed health, social and legal risks in a context of normalized cannabis use. METHODS: We present selected findings from our qualitative study of Baby Boomer (born 1946-1964) cannabis users in the San Francisco Bay Area. Data collection consisted of a recorded, in-depth life history interview followed by a questionnaire and health survey. Qualitative interviews were analyzed to discover the factors of cannabis harm reduction from the users' perspectives. RESULTS: Interviewees made harm reduction choices based on preferred cannabis derivatives and routes of administration, as well as why, when, where, and with whom to use. Most interviewees minimized cannabis-related harms so they could maintain social functioning in their everyday lives. Responsible and controlled use was described as moderation of quantity and frequency of cannabis used, using in appropriate settings, and respect for non-users. Users contributed to the normalization of cannabis use through normification. CONCLUSION: Participants followed rituals or cultural practices, characterized by sanctions that helped define "normal" or "acceptable" cannabis use. Users contributed to cannabis normalization through their harm reduction methods. These cultural practices may prove to be more effective than formal legal prohibitions in reducing cannabis-related harms. Findings also suggest that users with access to a regulated market (medical cannabis dispensaries) were better equipped to practice harm reduction. More research is needed on both cannabis culture and alternative routes of administration as harm reduction methods.
BACKGROUND: Cannabis use is becoming more accepted in mainstream society. In this paper, we use Zinberg's classic theoretical framework of drug, set, and setting to elucidate how older adult cannabis users managed health, social and legal risks in a context of normalized cannabis use. METHODS: We present selected findings from our qualitative study of Baby Boomer (born 1946-1964) cannabis users in the San Francisco Bay Area. Data collection consisted of a recorded, in-depth life history interview followed by a questionnaire and health survey. Qualitative interviews were analyzed to discover the factors of cannabis harm reduction from the users' perspectives. RESULTS: Interviewees made harm reduction choices based on preferred cannabis derivatives and routes of administration, as well as why, when, where, and with whom to use. Most interviewees minimized cannabis-related harms so they could maintain social functioning in their everyday lives. Responsible and controlled use was described as moderation of quantity and frequency of cannabis used, using in appropriate settings, and respect for non-users. Users contributed to the normalization of cannabis use through normification. CONCLUSION:Participants followed rituals or cultural practices, characterized by sanctions that helped define "normal" or "acceptable" cannabis use. Users contributed to cannabis normalization through their harm reduction methods. These cultural practices may prove to be more effective than formal legal prohibitions in reducing cannabis-related harms. Findings also suggest that users with access to a regulated market (medical cannabis dispensaries) were better equipped to practice harm reduction. More research is needed on both cannabis culture and alternative routes of administration as harm reduction methods.
Authors: Julie Bobitt; Sara H Qualls; Melissa Schuchman; Robert Wickersham; Hillary D Lum; Kanika Arora; Gary Milavetz; Brian Kaskie Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: James A Cranford; Kipling M Bohnert; Brian E Perron; Carrie Bourque; Mark Ilgen Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-10-15 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Kevin F Boehnke; Laura Yakas; J Ryan Scott; Melissa DeJonckheere; Evangelos Litinas; Suzanne Sisley; Daniel J Clauw; David A Williams; Jenna McAfee Journal: J Cannabis Res Date: 2022-01-11