Literature DB >> 25910666

Characterization and significance of protrusions in the mucosal defect after cold snare polypectomy.

Nicholas Tutticci1, Nicholas G Burgess2, Maria Pellise1, Duncan Mcleod3, Michael J Bourke2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is widely practiced; however, the endoscopic features of the CSP mucosal defect have not been studied. In particular, protrusions within the cold snare defect (CSDPs) may create concern for residual polyp. The frequency and constituents of this phenomenon are unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency, predictors, and histologic constituents of CSDPs.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: Tertiary-care hospital endoscopy unit. PATIENTS: Eighty-eight consecutive patients undergoing CSP for a polyp ≤ 10 mm in size. INTERVENTION: Inspection of the cold snare mucosal defect with high-definition white light and biopsy sampling of CSDPs for separate histologic assessment, when present. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Frequency and constituents of CSDPs.
RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-seven consecutive polyps ≤ 10 mm in size were removed in 88 patients (50 men [57%], mean age 63 years). Polyps were predominately adenomatous (162, 63%), located in the proximal colon (159, 62%) and flat (200, 78%). Mean lesion size was 5.5 mm (range, 2-10 mm). High-grade dysplasia was present in a single polyp for which the defect was bland. CSDPs occurred in 36 polypectomies (14%). CSDPs were associated with polyp size ≥ 6 mm (odds ratio, 3.7; P < .001 multivariable analysis) but not age, sex, lesion, histopathology, morphology, or location. Histopathologic examination of CSDPs revealed submucosa in 34 (94%) and muscularis mucosa in 29 (80%). No residual adenomatous or serrated polyp tissue was detected. LIMITATIONS: Single-center study. Small number of polyps with high-grade dysplasia.
CONCLUSION: Protrusions are common within the CSP mucosal defect and are associated with polyp size ≥ 6 mm. CSDPs do not represent vascular structures, do not contain residual polyp, and are not associated with adverse outcomes in short-term follow-up. However, CSDPs represent incomplete mucosal layer resection.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25910666     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  15 in total

1.  Safety of cold polypectomy for small colorectal neoplastic lesions: a prospective cohort study in Japan.

Authors:  Yuichi Shimodate; Motowo Mizuno; Rio Takezawa; Mami Kobayashi; Tatsuhiro Yamazaki; Akira Doi; Naoyuki Nishimura; Hirokazu Mouri; Kazuhiro Matsueda; Hiroshi Yamamoto
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Pushing the Limit: How to Get the Most Out of Cold Snares.

Authors:  Daniel von Renteln; Heiko Pohl
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Resection depth and layer of cold snare polypectomy versus endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Akihiro Ito; Tomoaki Suga; Hiroyoshi Ota; Nobuyuki Tateiwa; Akihiro Matsumoto; Eiji Tanaka
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  Prospective multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy for ≤ 6-mm non-ampullary duodenal low-grade adenomas.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Kanzaki; Joichiro Horii; Ryuta Takenaka; Hiroyuki Nakagawa; Kazuhiro Matsueda; Takao Tsuzuki; Masahide Kita; Yasushi Yamasaki; Takehiro Tanaka; Masaya Iwamuro; Seiji Kawano; Yoshiro Kawahara; Jun Tomoda; Hiroyuki Okada
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-06-10

5.  The Wick Sign After Cold Snare Polypectomy: A Case Report.

Authors:  Gregory T Brennan; Gregory Albers
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-05-12

Review 6.  Sessile Serrated Adenomas: How to Detect, Characterize and Resect.

Authors:  Michael X Ma; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.519

7.  A Diminutive T1 Cancer 4 mm in Size Resected by Cold Snare Polypectomy.

Authors:  Naohisa Yoshida; Yuji Naito; Takaaki Murakami; Kiyoshi Ogiso; Ryohei Hirose; Yutaka Inada; Mitsuo Kishimoto; Rafiz Abdul Rani; Yoshito Itoh
Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-19

8.  Cold snare polypectomy for non-pedunculated colon polyps greater than 1 cm.

Authors:  Cyrus Piraka; Ahmed Saeed; Akbar K Waljee; Ajish Pillai; Ryan Stidham; B Joseph Elmunzer
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-03

9.  Extended cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps increases the R0 resection rate.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Abe; Haruaki Nabeta; Ryota Koyanagi; Taro Nakamichi; Hayato Hirashima; Alan Kawarai Lefor; Satoshi Shinozaki
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-02-07

10.  Validation of treatment algorithm based on the Japan narrow-band imaging expert team classification for sub-centimeter colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Motohiko Kato; Keiichiro Abe; Yoko Kubosawa; Yukie Sunata; Yuichiro Hirai; Tetsu Hirata; Yoshiaki Takada; Michiko Wada; Yusaku Takatori; Shigeo Banno; Satoshi Kinoshita; Hideki Mori; Kaoru Takabayashi; Masahiro Kikuchi; Junichi Shiraishi; Toshio Uraoka
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.