Literature DB >> 25910381

Building a more mobile America--one income quintile at a time.

Shai Davidai1, Thomas Gilovich2.   

Abstract

A core tenet of the American ethos is that there is considerable economic mobility. Americans seem willing to accept vast financial inequalities as long as they believe that everyone has the opportunity to succeed. We examined whether people's beliefs about the amount of economic mobility in the contemporary United States conform to reality. We found that (a) people believe there is more upward mobility than downward mobility; (b) people overestimate the amount of upward mobility and underestimate the amount of downward mobility; (c) poorer individuals believe there is more mobility than richer individuals; and (d) political affiliation influences perceptions of economic mobility, with conservatives believing that the economic system is more dynamic-with more people moving both up and down the income distribution-than liberals do. We discuss how these findings can shed light on the intensity and nature of political debate in the United States on economic inequality and opportunity.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fairness; income; inequality; justice; political ideology; social mobility

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25910381     DOI: 10.1177/1745691614562005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  10 in total

1.  Americans overestimate the intergenerational persistence in income ranks.

Authors:  Siwei Cheng; Fangqi Wen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Americans misperceive racial economic equality.

Authors:  Michael W Kraus; Julian M Rucker; Jennifer A Richeson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evidence for the reproduction of social class in brief speech.

Authors:  Michael W Kraus; Brittany Torrez; Jun Won Park; Fariba Ghayebi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Signs of Social Class: The Experience of Economic Inequality in Everyday Life.

Authors:  Michael W Kraus; Jun Won Park; Jacinth J X Tan
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-05

5.  The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour.

Authors:  Antony S R Manstead
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2018-02-28

6.  Punishing the privileged: Selfish offers from high-status allocators elicit greater punishment from third-party arbitrators.

Authors:  Bradley D Mattan; Denise M Barth; Alexandra Thompson; Oriel FeldmanHall; Jasmin Cloutier; Jennifer T Kubota
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Reducing opinion polarization: Effects of exposure to similar people with differing political views.

Authors:  Stefano Balietti; Lise Getoor; Daniel G Goldstein; Duncan J Watts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Ideology selectively shapes attention to inequality.

Authors:  Hannah B Waldfogel; Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington; Oliver P Hauser; Arnold K Ho; Nour S Kteily
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Americans Still Overestimate Social Class Mobility: A Pre-Registered Self-Replication.

Authors:  Michael W Kraus
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-09

10.  The politics of zero-sum thinking: The relationship between political ideology and the belief that life is a zero-sum game.

Authors:  Shai Davidai; Martino Ongis
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 14.136

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.