Literature DB >> 25910064

Split dosing with a low-volume preparation is not inferior to split dosing with a high-volume preparation for bowel cleansing in patients with a history of colorectal resection: a randomized trial.

Alessandro Mussetto1, Leonardo Frazzoni2, Silvia Paggi3, Silvia Dari1, Liboria Laterza2, Franco Radaelli3, Cesare Hassan4, Omero Triossi1, Lorenzo Fuccio2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: The study compared the efficacy of bowel cleansing using a low-volume mixed preparation (15 mg bisacodyl plus 2 L polyethylene glycol [PEG] solution) versus a standard high-volume preparation (4 L PEG) in patients with previous colorectal resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients with prior colorectal resection for cancer undergoing surveillance colonoscopy were randomized to receive either a split-dose low-volume (n = 60) or high-volume (n = 60) preparation for bowel cleansing. The quality of bowel preparation, rated according to a modified Ottawa Bowel Preparation scale (mOBPS), represented the primary outcome measure. Tolerability, safety, and lesion detection rates were secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the low-volume and high-volume preparations in achievement of adequate cleansing (i. e. mOBPS ≤ 4; low-volume vs. high-volume group, 85.0 % vs. 81.7 %, P = 0.624). The low-volume preparation showed a higher success rate for cleansing of the right colon (P = 0.025); better tolerability in terms of intake of the whole amount of the preparation (P < 0.001) was also observed. According to the logistic regression analysis, the only predictors of unsuccessful cleansing were previous left colectomy (P = 0.012) and a longer elapsed time since the intervention (P = 0.034). Lesion detection rates were comparable between the groups. No serious adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSION: A low-volume preparation is not inferior to a high-volume preparation for adequate bowel cleansing in patients with prior colorectal resection for cancer. If larger, multicenter, prospective studies confirm our findings, a low-volume preparation will represent a more tolerable option for such patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT01887158. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25910064     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1391987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of bowel preparation quality in patients with a history of colorectal resection.

Authors:  In Kyung Yoo; Yoon Tae Jeen; Seong Ji Choi; Hyuk Soon Choi; Bora Keum; Eun Sun Kim; Hoon Jai Chun; Hong Sik Lee; Chang Duck Kim
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Same-Day Single Dose of 2 Liter Polyethylene Glycol is Not Inferior to The Standard Bowel Preparation Regimen in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Kang; Lina Zhao; Zhiyong Zhu; Felix Leung; Limei Wang; Xiangping Wang; Hui Luo; Linhui Zhang; Tao Dong; Pingying Li; Zhangqin Chen; Gui Ren; Hui Jia; Xiaoyang Guo; Yanglin Pan; Xuegang Guo; Daiming Fan
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Comparison of Two Intensive Bowel Cleansing Regimens in Patients With Previous Poor Bowel Preparation: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Antonio Z Gimeno-García; Goretti Hernandez; Ana Aldea; David Nicolás-Pérez; Alejandro Jiménez; Marta Carrillo; Vanesa Felipe; Onofre Alarcón-Fernández; Manuel Hernandez-Guerra; Rafael Romero; Inmaculada Alonso; Yanira Gonzalez; Zaida Adrian; Miguel Moreno; Laura Ramos; Enrique Quintero
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  An Enhanced High-Volume Preparation for Colonoscopy Is Not Better Than a Conventional Low-Volume One in Patients at Risk of Poor Bowel Cleansing: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Antonio Z Gimeno-García; Goretti Hernández; José Luis Baute Dorta; Cristina Reygosa; Raquel de la Barreda; Alberto Hernandez-Bustabad; Carla Amaral; Yaiza Cedrés; Rocío Del Castillo; David Nicolás-Pérez; Alejandro Jiménez; Onofre Alarcon-Fernández; Manuel Hernandez-Guerra; Rafael Romero; Inmaculada Alonso; Yanira González; Zaida Adrian; Domingo Hernandez; Laura Ramos; Marta Carrillo; Vanessa Felipe; Anjara Hernández; Consuelo Rodríguez-Jiménez; Enrique Quintero
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-03-22

Review 5.  Novel frontiers of agents for bowel cleansing for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Milena Di Leo; Andrea Iannone; Monica Arena; Giuseppe Losurdo; Maria Angela Palamara; Giuseppe Iabichino; Pierluigi Consolo; Maria Rendina; Carmelo Luigiano; Alfredo Di Leo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Strategies to Improve Inadequate Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Goretti Hernández; Antonio Z Gimeno-García; Enrique Quintero
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-11-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.