Yang Zhang1, Jon-Kyle Davis, Douglas J Casa, Phillip A Bishop. 1. 1Chinese Badminton Association, Zhejiang Jiaxing Badminton Association, Zhejiang Province, CHINA; 2Gatorade Sports Science Institute, Barrington, IL; 3Department of Kinesiology, Korey Stringer Institute, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; and 4Department of Kinesiology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Cold water immersion (CWI) provides rapid cooling in events of exertional heat stroke. Optimal procedures for CWI in the field are not well established. This meta-analysis aimed to provide structured analysis of the effectiveness of CWI on the cooling rate in healthy adults subjected to exercise-induced hyperthermia. METHODS: An electronic search (December 2014) was conducted using the PubMed and Web of Science. The mean difference of the cooling rate between CWI and passive recovery was calculated. Pooled analyses were based on a random-effects model. Sources of heterogeneity were identified through a mixed-effects model Q statistic. Inferential statistics aggregated the CWI cooling rate for extrapolation. RESULTS: Nineteen studies qualified for inclusion. Results demonstrate CWI elicited a significant effect: mean difference, 0.03°C·min(-1); 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.04°C·min(-1). A conservative, observed estimate of the CWI cooling rate was 0.08°C·min(-1) across various conditions. CWI cooled individuals twice as fast as passive recovery. Subgroup analyses revealed that cooling was more effective (Q test P < 0.10) when preimmersion core temperature ≥38.6°C, immersion water temperature ≤10°C, ambient temperature ≥20°C, immersion duration ≤10 min, and using torso plus limbs immersion. There is insufficient evidence of effect using forearms/hands CWI for rapid cooling: mean difference, 0.01°C·min(-1); 95% confidence interval, -0.01°C·min(-1) to 0.04°C·min(-1). A combined data summary, pertaining to 607 subjects from 29 relevant studies, was presented for referencing the weighted cooling rate and recovery time, aiming for practitioners to better plan emergency procedures. CONCLUSIONS: An optimal procedure for yielding high cooling rates is proposed. Using prompt vigorous CWI should be encouraged for treating exercise-induced hyperthermia whenever possible, using cold water temperature (approximately 10°C) and maximizing body surface contact (whole-body immersion).
PURPOSE: Cold water immersion (CWI) provides rapid cooling in events of exertional heat stroke. Optimal procedures for CWI in the field are not well established. This meta-analysis aimed to provide structured analysis of the effectiveness of CWI on the cooling rate in healthy adults subjected to exercise-induced hyperthermia. METHODS: An electronic search (December 2014) was conducted using the PubMed and Web of Science. The mean difference of the cooling rate between CWI and passive recovery was calculated. Pooled analyses were based on a random-effects model. Sources of heterogeneity were identified through a mixed-effects model Q statistic. Inferential statistics aggregated the CWI cooling rate for extrapolation. RESULTS: Nineteen studies qualified for inclusion. Results demonstrate CWI elicited a significant effect: mean difference, 0.03°C·min(-1); 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.04°C·min(-1). A conservative, observed estimate of the CWI cooling rate was 0.08°C·min(-1) across various conditions. CWI cooled individuals twice as fast as passive recovery. Subgroup analyses revealed that cooling was more effective (Q test P < 0.10) when preimmersion core temperature ≥38.6°C, immersion water temperature ≤10°C, ambient temperature ≥20°C, immersion duration ≤10 min, and using torso plus limbs immersion. There is insufficient evidence of effect using forearms/hands CWI for rapid cooling: mean difference, 0.01°C·min(-1); 95% confidence interval, -0.01°C·min(-1) to 0.04°C·min(-1). A combined data summary, pertaining to 607 subjects from 29 relevant studies, was presented for referencing the weighted cooling rate and recovery time, aiming for practitioners to better plan emergency procedures. CONCLUSIONS: An optimal procedure for yielding high cooling rates is proposed. Using prompt vigorous CWI should be encouraged for treating exercise-induced hyperthermia whenever possible, using cold water temperature (approximately 10°C) and maximizing body surface contact (whole-body immersion).
Authors: Dieter Leyk; Joachim Hoitz; Clemens Becker; Karl Jochen Glitz; Kai Nestler; Claus Piekarski Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2019-08-05 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Cory L Butts; Katherine E Luhring; Cody R Smith; Matthew A Tucker; Nicole E Moyen; Matthew S Ganio; Brendon P McDermott Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2016-01-18 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Arthur J Cheng; Sarah J Willis; Christoph Zinner; Thomas Chaillou; Niklas Ivarsson; Niels Ørtenblad; Johanna T Lanner; Hans-Christer Holmberg; Håkan Westerblad Journal: J Physiol Date: 2017-10-25 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Erica M Filep; Yuki Murata; Brad D Endres; Gyujin Kim; Rebecca L Stearns; Douglas J Casa Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2020-11-05 Impact factor: 2.430