Literature DB >> 25909982

Performance of currently available risk models in a cohort of mechanically supported high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention--From the PROTECT II randomized trial.

José P S Henriques1, Bimmer E Claessen2, George D Dangas3, Ajay J Kirtane4, Jeffrey J Popma5, Joseph M Massaro6, Barry M Cohen7, E Magnus Ohman8, Jeffrey W Moses4, William W O'Neill9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Procedural risk scores facilitate clinical decision making by using individual patient characteristics to estimate the risk of adverse events. The performance of PCI-based risk scores is not well-described among patients undergoing hemodynamically supported high risk PCI. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 427 patients with unprotected left main disease, last remaining vessel or three-vessel disease with severely reduced left ventricular function underwent supported high-risk PCI with an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP, N = 211) or a left ventricular assist device (Impella 2.5, N = 216) as part of the PROTECT II trial. We examined the performance of the additive Euroscore, logistic Euroscore, STS mortality score, STS morbidity and mortality score, Mayo Clinic risk score and New York state PCI risk score on the endpoint of 90-day mortality in this unique high-risk population. Mean age was 67.2 ± 10.9 years; 65.8% of patients were in NYHA class III/IV, and mean LVEF was 24%. All-cause 90-day mortality was 10.4%. The scores were generally correlated (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons), with R(2) values ranging from 0.28 (STS morbidity/mortality and Mayo Clinic) to 0.68 (logistic Euroscore and STS mortality). However, receiver-operator curves for 90-day all-cause mortality for all risk scores demonstrated poor discriminatory performance with c-statistics of 0.542-0.616. Calibration of the risk scores was not poor, but varied according to the specific score examined.
CONCLUSION: The discriminatory capacity of currently available risk models is suboptimal when applied to a cohort of mechanically supported complex high-risk PCI. A risk score designed specifically for this population could help to further refine risk assessment.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemodynamix support; High-risk; IABP; Impella; Percutaneous Coronar Intervention; Risk scores

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25909982     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  3 in total

1.  Treatment of Higher-Risk Patients With an Indication for Revascularization: Evolution Within the Field of Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Ajay J Kirtane; Darshan Doshi; Martin B Leon; John M Lasala; E Magnus Ohman; William W O'Neill; Adhir Shroff; Mauricio G Cohen; Igor F Palacios; Nirat Beohar; Nir Uriel; Navin K Kapur; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; William Lombardi; George D Dangas; Manish A Parikh; Gregg W Stone; Jeffrey W Moses
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 39.918

2.  Impact of patient's health-related quality of life on physicians' therapy and perceived benefit in acute coronary syndromes: protocol for a systemic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.

Authors:  Billingsley Kaambwa; Hailay Gesesew; Matthew Horsfall; Derek P Chew
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Quality of Life Changes in Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Billingsley Kaambwa; Hailay Abrha Gesesew; Matthew Horsfall; Derek Chew
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.