Fereshteh Shafiei1, Mahtab Memarpour2. 1. Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. 2. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. memarpour@sums.ac.ir.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of etching on marginal sealing of nanofilled resin-modified glass ionomer restorations in Class V cavities in primary teeth prepared with an Er, Cr:YSGG laser compared to bur preparation. METHODS: Standard Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces of 56 extracted primary canines that were randomly divided into four groups of 14 teeth each, according to laser or bur preparation and whether acid etching was used or not in the cavity. All cavities were restored with Nano primer/Ketac N100. After storage for six months in water and 2,000 thermal cycles, the specimens were placed in a one percent basic fuchsin dye solution. Dye penetration was evaluated with a stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed via nonparametric tests (P<.05). RESULTS: Etching in bur- and laser-prepared cavities significantly reduced enamel microleakage (P=.031 and P=.001, respectively). At the dentin margin, etching significantly increased microleakage in bur-prepared cavities (P=.009) and significantly decreased it in laser-prepared cavities (P=.009). CONCLUSIONS: Etching may improve the sealing ability of Ketac N100 at both margins in laser-prepared cavities and at the enamel margin in bur-prepared cavities. It had an adverse effect on dentinal sealing in aged Ketac N100 restorations in primary teeth.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of etching on marginal sealing of nanofilled resin-modified glass ionomer restorations in Class V cavities in primary teeth prepared with an Er, Cr:YSGG laser compared to bur preparation. METHODS: Standard Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces of 56 extracted primary canines that were randomly divided into four groups of 14 teeth each, according to laser or bur preparation and whether acid etching was used or not in the cavity. All cavities were restored with Nano primer/Ketac N100. After storage for six months in water and 2,000 thermal cycles, the specimens were placed in a one percent basic fuchsin dye solution. Dye penetration was evaluated with a stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed via nonparametric tests (P<.05). RESULTS: Etching in bur- and laser-prepared cavities significantly reduced enamel microleakage (P=.031 and P=.001, respectively). At the dentin margin, etching significantly increased microleakage in bur-prepared cavities (P=.009) and significantly decreased it in laser-prepared cavities (P=.009). CONCLUSIONS: Etching may improve the sealing ability of Ketac N100 at both margins in laser-prepared cavities and at the enamel margin in bur-prepared cavities. It had an adverse effect on dentinal sealing in aged Ketac N100 restorations in primary teeth.