Literature DB >> 25909580

Auditory working memory predicts individual differences in absolute pitch learning.

Stephen C Van Hedger1, Shannon L M Heald2, Rachelle Koch2, Howard C Nusbaum2.   

Abstract

Absolute pitch (AP) is typically defined as the ability to label an isolated tone as a musical note in the absence of a reference tone. At first glance the acquisition of AP note categories seems like a perceptual learning task, since individuals must assign a category label to a stimulus based on a single perceptual dimension (pitch) while ignoring other perceptual dimensions (e.g., loudness, octave, instrument). AP, however, is rarely discussed in terms of domain-general perceptual learning mechanisms. This is because AP is typically assumed to depend on a critical period of development, in which early exposure to pitches and musical labels is thought to be necessary for the development of AP precluding the possibility of adult acquisition of AP. Despite this view of AP, several previous studies have found evidence that absolute pitch category learning is, to an extent, trainable in a post-critical period adult population, even if the performance typically achieved by this population is below the performance of a "true" AP possessor. The current studies attempt to understand the individual differences in learning to categorize notes using absolute pitch cues by testing a specific prediction regarding cognitive capacity related to categorization - to what extent does an individual's general auditory working memory capacity (WMC) predict the success of absolute pitch category acquisition. Since WMC has been shown to predict performance on a wide variety of other perceptual and category learning tasks, we predict that individuals with higher WMC should be better at learning absolute pitch note categories than individuals with lower WMC. Across two studies, we demonstrate that auditory WMC predicts the efficacy of learning absolute pitch note categories. These results suggest that a higher general auditory WMC might underlie the formation of absolute pitch categories for post-critical period adults. Implications for understanding the mechanisms that underlie the phenomenon of AP are also discussed.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Absolute pitch; Category learning; Expertise; Individual differences; Perceptual learning; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25909580     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  8 in total

Review 1.  Amblyopia: New molecular/pharmacological and environmental approaches.

Authors:  Michael P Stryker; Siegrid Löwel
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Cortical mechanisms of talker normalization in fluent sentences.

Authors:  Sophia Uddin; Katherine S Reis; Shannon L M Heald; Stephen C Van Hedger; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Perceptual Plasticity for Auditory Object Recognition.

Authors:  Shannon L M Heald; Stephen C Van Hedger; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-23

4.  Music Proficiency and Quantification of Absolute Pitch: A Large-Scale Study among Brazilian Musicians.

Authors:  Raphael B C Leite; Sergio A Mota-Rolim; Claudio M T Queiroz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 5.  On the Perceptual Subprocess of Absolute Pitch.

Authors:  Seung-Goo Kim; Thomas R Knösche
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect?

Authors:  Violet A Brown; Maryam Hedayati; Annie Zanger; Sasha Mayn; Lucia Ray; Naseem Dillman-Hasso; Julia F Strand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Absolute pitch can be learned by some adults.

Authors:  Stephen C Van Hedger; Shannon L M Heald; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability.

Authors:  Katherine S Reis; Shannon L M Heald; John P Veillette; Stephen C Van Hedger; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.