Literature DB >> 25909519

Consecutive case series of monolithic and minimally veneered zirconia restorations on teeth and implants: up to 68 months.

Michael Moscovitch.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of monolithic zirconia in function and minimally veneered zirconia (feldspathic ceramic, not in function, on the facial surface to enhance tooth esthetics or replace gingival structures) on both teeth and implants. This open-ended consecutive case series involved 238 patients between the ages of 16 and 92 years, 1,022 restoration units, and 365 cases in all categories of tooth and implant restorations in a private practice clinical environment for up to 68 months. The restoration parameters monitored in the patient base were fracture, cracking, or chipping of the zirconia structure and/or the minimally veneered feldspathic ceramic. There were no observed complications with respect to these parameters associated with any of the restorations included in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25909519     DOI: 10.11607/prd.2270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent        ISSN: 0198-7569            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Tooth substance removal for ceramic single crown materials-an in vitro comparison.

Authors:  Franz Sebastian Schwindling; Moritz Waldecker; Peter Rammelsberg; Stefan Rues; Wolfgang Bömicke
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Shear bond strength of indirect composite material to monolithic zirconia.

Authors:  Fatih Sari; Asli Secilmis; Irfan Simsek; Semih Ozsevik
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Aging of monolithic zirconia dental prostheses: Protocol for a 5-year prospective clinical study using ex vivo analyses.

Authors:  Vinciane Koenig; Claudine P Wulfman; Mathieu A Derbanne; Nathalie M Dupont; Stéphane O Le Goff; Mie-Leng Tang; Laurence Seidel; Thibaut Y Dewael; Alain J Vanheusden; Amélie K Mainjot
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2016-06-17

4.  Monolithic and Minimally Veneered Zirconia Complications as Implant-Supported Restorative Material: A Retrospective Clinical Study up to 5 Years.

Authors:  Markel Diéguez-Pereira; David Chávarri-Prado; Alejandro Estrada-Martínez; Esteban Pérez-Pevida; Aritza Brizuela-Velasco
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Survival and Success Rates of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations Supported by Teeth and Implants in Bruxer versus Non-Bruxer Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Hadas Heller; David Sreter; Adi Arieli; Ilan Beitlitum; Raphael Pilo; Shifra Levartovsky
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 6.  Clinical outcomes of all-ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prostheses supported by ceramic implants: A systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Frank Akito Spitznagel; Marc Balmer; Daniel B Wiedemeier; Ronald Ernst Jung; Petra Christine Gierthmuehlen
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 5.021

7.  Fracture strength of veneered translucent zirconium dioxide crowns with different porcelain thicknesses.

Authors:  Fahad Bakitian; Przemek Seweryniak; Evaggelia Papia; Christel Larsson; Per Vult von Steyern
Journal:  Acta Biomater Odontol Scand       Date:  2017-11-14

Review 8.  Clinical performance of resin-matrix ceramic partial coverage restorations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hanan Fathy; Hamdi H Hamama; Noha El-Wassefy; Salah H Mahmoud
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.606

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.