Trygve Thorsen1, Einar Martin Aandahl, William Bennet, Michael Olausson, Bo-Göran Ericzon, Greg Nowak, Frans Duraj, Helena Isoniemi, Allan Rasmussen, Tom H Karlsen, Aksel Foss. 1. 1 Department of Transplantation Medicine, Section for Transplant Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 2 Biotechnology Centre of Oslo, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. 3 Centre for Molecular Medicine Norway, Nordic EMBL Partnership, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. 4 Department of Transplantation, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. 5 Division of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Solna, Sweden. 6 Department of Surgical Sciences, Upper Abdominal Surgery, Uppsala Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. 7 Transplantation and Liver Surgery Clinic, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. 8 Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. 9 Division of Cancer medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Norwegian PSC Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway. 10 Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The availability of donor organs limits the number of patients in need who are offered liver transplantation. Measures to expand the donor pool are crucial to prevent on-list mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of livers from deceased donors who were older than 75 years. METHODS: Fifty-four patients who received a first liver transplant (D75 group) from 2001 to 2011 were included. Donor and recipient data were collected from the Nordic Liver Transplant Registry and medical records. The outcome was compared with a control group of 54 patients who received a liver graft from donors aged 20 to 49 years (D20-49 group). Median donor age was 77 years (range, 75-86 years) in the D75 group and 41 years (range, 20-49 years) in the D20-49 group. Median recipient age was 59 years (range, 31-73 years) in the D75 group and 58 years (range, 31-74 years) in the D20-49 group. RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient/graft survival values were 87/87%, 81/81%, and 71/67% for the D75 group and 88/87%, 75/73%, and 75/73% for the D20-49 group, respectively. Patient (P = 0.89) and graft (P = 0.79) survival did not differ between groups. The frequency of biliary complications was higher in the D75 group (29.6/13%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Selected livers from donors over age 75 years should not be excluded based on age, which does not compromise patient or graft survival despite a higher frequency of biliary complications.
BACKGROUND: The availability of donor organs limits the number of patients in need who are offered liver transplantation. Measures to expand the donor pool are crucial to prevent on-list mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of livers from deceased donors who were older than 75 years. METHODS: Fifty-four patients who received a first liver transplant (D75 group) from 2001 to 2011 were included. Donor and recipient data were collected from the Nordic Liver Transplant Registry and medical records. The outcome was compared with a control group of 54 patients who received a liver graft from donors aged 20 to 49 years (D20-49 group). Median donor age was 77 years (range, 75-86 years) in the D75 group and 41 years (range, 20-49 years) in the D20-49 group. Median recipient age was 59 years (range, 31-73 years) in the D75 group and 58 years (range, 31-74 years) in the D20-49 group. RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient/graft survival values were 87/87%, 81/81%, and 71/67% for the D75 group and 88/87%, 75/73%, and 75/73% for the D20-49 group, respectively. Patient (P = 0.89) and graft (P = 0.79) survival did not differ between groups. The frequency of biliary complications was higher in the D75 group (29.6/13%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Selected livers from donors over age 75 years should not be excluded based on age, which does not compromise patient or graft survival despite a higher frequency of biliary complications.
Authors: Alberto Lué; Estela Solanas; Pedro Baptista; Sara Lorente; Juan J Araiz; Agustin Garcia-Gil; M Trinidad Serrano Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Harleen Chela; Mohamad H Yousef; Abdelmajeed A Albarrak; Bhupinder S Romana; Dania N Hudhud; Veysel Tahan Journal: World J Transplant Date: 2017-12-24
Authors: Jacob D de Boer; Joris J Blok; Hein Putter; Jacob J E Koopman; Bart van Hoek; Undine Samuel; Marieke van Rosmalen; Herold J Metselaar; Ian P J Alwayn; Markus Guba; Andries E Braat Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 5.799