Christina R Vargas1, Matthew L Iorio, Bernard T Lee. 1. Boston, Mass. From the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative vasospasm during reconstructive microsurgery is common, often unpredictable, and potentially devastating with regard to flap survival. Current methods of pharmacologic management vary, and may be shifting as a result of changes in the availability of individual medications. This review aims to provide a concise examination of the published literature regarding use, efficacy, and adverse effects of the agents described for local management of vascular spasm during microsurgery. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify articles relevant to pharmacologic treatment of intraoperative vasospasm in vivo. An additional review of the literature was performed with regard to each agent identified in order to provide clinical background information. RESULTS: Systematic review identified 20 articles, in which 14 vasodilator agents were evaluated. Drugs were classified into five pharmacologic categories: phosphodiesterase inhibitors (papaverine, pentoxifylline, and amrinone), local anesthetics (lidocaine), calcium channel blockers (nicardipine, verapamil, nifedipine, and magnesium sulfate), direct vasodilators (sodium nitroprusside, prostaglandin E1, nitroglycerin, and hydralazine), and alpha antagonists (phentolamine and chlorpromazine). Despite a variety of methods, these studies indicate some degree of experimental evidence of efficacy for each of these agents. CONCLUSIONS: Available literature regarding use of topical vasodilating agents for intraoperative management of vasospasm during microsurgery is limited and largely based on animal models, which may not reliably generalize to the reconstructive patient population. Well-controlled translational study in clinically applicable and reproducible models is needed to guide evidence-based clinical management of this important phenomenon.
BACKGROUND:Intraoperative vasospasm during reconstructive microsurgery is common, often unpredictable, and potentially devastating with regard to flap survival. Current methods of pharmacologic management vary, and may be shifting as a result of changes in the availability of individual medications. This review aims to provide a concise examination of the published literature regarding use, efficacy, and adverse effects of the agents described for local management of vascular spasm during microsurgery. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify articles relevant to pharmacologic treatment of intraoperative vasospasm in vivo. An additional review of the literature was performed with regard to each agent identified in order to provide clinical background information. RESULTS: Systematic review identified 20 articles, in which 14 vasodilator agents were evaluated. Drugs were classified into five pharmacologic categories: phosphodiesterase inhibitors (papaverine, pentoxifylline, and amrinone), local anesthetics (lidocaine), calcium channel blockers (nicardipine, verapamil, nifedipine, and magnesium sulfate), direct vasodilators (sodium nitroprusside, prostaglandin E1, nitroglycerin, and hydralazine), and alpha antagonists (phentolamine and chlorpromazine). Despite a variety of methods, these studies indicate some degree of experimental evidence of efficacy for each of these agents. CONCLUSIONS: Available literature regarding use of topical vasodilating agents for intraoperative management of vasospasm during microsurgery is limited and largely based on animal models, which may not reliably generalize to the reconstructive patient population. Well-controlled translational study in clinically applicable and reproducible models is needed to guide evidence-based clinical management of this important phenomenon.