Chia-Jung Li1, Li-Yi Sun2, Cheng-Yoong Pang3. 1. Institute of Medical Sciences, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan. 2. Department of Medical Research, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan. 3. 1] Institute of Medical Sciences, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan [2] Department of Medical Research, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan.
Abstract
Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) contribute to ischemic tissue repair, regeneration, and possess ability to self-renew. However, poor viability of transplanted hMSCs within ischemic tissues has limited its therapeutic efficiency. Therefore, it is urgent to explore new method to improve the viability of the grafted cells. By using a systematic analysis, we reveal the mechanism of synergistic protection of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (AAP) on hMSCs that were under H2O2-induced oxidative stress. The combined treatment of NAC and AAP (NAC/AAP) reduces reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, stabilizes mitochondrial membrane potential and decreases mitochondrial fission/fragmentation due to oxidative stress. Mitochondrial fission/fragmentation is a major prologue of mitoptosis. NAC/AAP prevents apoptotic cell death via decreasing the activation of BAX, increasing the expression of BCL2, and reducing cytochrome c release from mitochondria that might lead to the activation of caspase cascade. Stabilization of mitochondria also prevents the release of AIF, and its nuclear translocation which may activate necroptosis via H2AX pathway. The decreasing of mitoptosis is further studied by MicroP image analysis, and is associated with decreased activation of Drp1. In conclusion, NAC/AAP protects mitochondria from H2O2-induced oxidative stress and rescues hMSCs from mitoptosis, necroptosis and apoptosis.
Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) contribute to ischemic tissue repair, regeneration, and possess ability to self-renew. However, poor viability of transplanted hMSCs within ischemic tissues has limited its therapeutic efficiency. Therefore, it is urgent to explore new method to improve the viability of the grafted cells. By using a systematic analysis, we reveal the mechanism of synergistic protection of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (AAP) on hMSCs that were under H2O2-induced oxidative stress. The combined treatment of NAC and AAP (NAC/AAP) reduces reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, stabilizes mitochondrial membrane potential and decreases mitochondrial fission/fragmentation due to oxidative stress. Mitochondrial fission/fragmentation is a major prologue of mitoptosis. NAC/AAP prevents apoptotic cell death via decreasing the activation of BAX, increasing the expression of BCL2, and reducing cytochrome c release from mitochondria that might lead to the activation of caspase cascade. Stabilization of mitochondria also prevents the release of AIF, and its nuclear translocation which may activate necroptosis via H2AX pathway. The decreasing of mitoptosis is further studied by MicroP image analysis, and is associated with decreased activation of Drp1. In conclusion, NAC/AAP protects mitochondria from H2O2-induced oxidative stress and rescues hMSCs from mitoptosis, necroptosis and apoptosis.
Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) are multipotent stromal cells derived from
mesenchymes that reside within the bone marrow and adipose tissue. Currently, human bone
marrow-derived mesenchymal/stromal cells (hBMSCs) have been widely tested in treating
various diseases, for instance as an immune-modulator in allogenic bone marrow
transplantation12. However, the advantages of human adipose
tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hADMSCs), such as minimal patient discomfort
during procurement and expand more rapidly, have drawn the attention of using them as a
more ideal source of MSCs for autologous cells transplantation34.MSCs from various tissues can be easily isolated, however the low survival rate and
increased cell death after implantation into the ischemic/injured tissues suggest that
the microenvironment may not be conducive to their viability567.
Excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) due to sustained oxidative stress
in ischemia tissues is an essential factor that affects the survival of engrafted
MSCs67. ROS are formed as a natural byproduct of the normal energy
metabolism. ROS have been shown to play key role in the growth and homeostasis of MSCs:
lower ROS resulted in enhancement of proliferation, survival and differentiation, while
excessive ROS could lead to mitochondrial dysfunction, cell death, tissue inflammation,
and the aging of hMSCs by potentially compromising their differentiation and
regeneration ability89101112. Furthermore, mitochondrial
dysfunction has been suggested to be the main cause of oxidative stress-induced
apoptosis and necrosis during ischemia-reperfusion injury1314.
Therefore, protecting mitochondria and enhancement of cell survival is one of the
important measures in the development of hMSCs-based cytotherapy for ischemic tissue
injury6715.L-Ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (AAP) is an oxidation-resistant derivative of ascorbic acid.
AAP has been shown to promote mammalian cell differentiation and DNA synthesis1617. N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) is a prodrug/precursor of
biologic antioxidant, glutathione (GSH). Thus, NAC can serve as a potent ROS inhibitor,
and has been widely used to counter the adverse effects arising from oxidative
stress18. On the other hand, hypoxia has been shown to affect the
secretion of several growth factors, such as VEGF, HGF, HIF, and FGF-2, which all have
been shown to accelerate the proliferation of MSCs1920.Our previous study has also demonstrated that combined treatment of NAC and AAP (NAC/AAP)
promotes cell proliferation by suppressing cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in
hADMSCs. These NAC/AAP-treated hADMSCs retained their stem cell properties (as revealed
by the upregulation of several stemness genes), and their differentiation potential21. Moreover, these NAC/AAP-induced changes were quite similar to MSCs
cultivated under hypoxia (1%–5% pO2)22.However, the mechanism by which NAC/AAP treatment in helping cells to counter oxidative
stress is still not fully elucidated. In this study, we systematically tested 32
different combinations of NAC and AAP to find out the optimized concentration that
produced maximum protection for hMSCs suffering from oxidative stress. We then clarified
the major signal transduction pathways that were responsible for the survival of hMSCs
that were pretreated with NAC/AAP.
Results
NAC/AAP protected hADMSCs against H2O2-induced cell
death
In this study, we used H2O2 as an oxidative stressor to
evaluate its effects on hADMSCs, the adipose tissue-derived MSCs. Treatment with
various concentrations of H2O2 for 4 h reduced the hADMSCs
proliferation in a dose-dependent manner, and the median effective dose
(ED50) was determined to be approximately 0.5 mM. To test whether
NAC and/or AAP were able to protect hADMSCSs from oxidative stress, we treated
hADMSCs with various concentrations of NAC and/or AAP for 20 h followed by
exposure to 0.5mM H2O2 for 4 h (Fig. 1A
& B). As shown in Figure 1A, hADMSCs
were significantly rescued by NAC in a dose-dependent manner (p
< 0.001). AAP also rescued the survival of hADMSCs in a
dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1B, p <
0.001). To evaluate the synergistic protecting effect of NAC and AAP, we
subjected hADMSCs to various NAC/AAP concentrations for the subsequent studies.
The proliferation of combined treatment was similar to that observed in
high-dose single treatment groups (NAC: 7mM; AAP: 0.8mM, respectively). And
there was no significant difference of cell proliferation between the high-dose
groups and the combination of low-dose (Fig. 1C).
Figure 1
NAC/AAP inhibited H2O2-induced growth inhibition in
hADMSCs.
(A and B) hADMSCs were pretreated with different concentrations of NAC or AAP
followed by stimulation of 0.5 mM H2O2 for 4 h, and
the cell proliferation was assessed by Alamar Blue assay. (C) hADMSCs were
pretreated to different concentrations of NAC and/or AAP against
ROS-inhibited cell proliferation. Combined pretreatment resulted in
significant growth increased of hADMSCs, more than that by either drug
alone; the degree of proliferation in high-dose alone groups were not
significant. (D) Post-treatment of cells with NAC and/or AAP did not affect
the proliferation by H2O2 at 24 and 48 h (E)
Isobologram analysis of protective effects of NAC/AAP pretreatments alone or
in combination against H2O2-induced cytotoxicity in
hADMSCs. The diagonal line represents the isoeffect line of additivity. A
combination index of 1.0 (solid line) reflects additive effects, whereas
values greater than and less than 1.0 indicate antagonism and synergy,
respectively. (F) Graphical representation of combinatorial dosing. All
dosing combinations show synergy as determined by the Chou-Talalay method. *
p < 0.001, as compared to the control. # p
< 0.05; ## p < 0.01; ### p <
0.001, as compared to the H2O2-treated group. ns, not
significant.
Analysis of the protection obtained by NAC and AAP co-treatment indicated a
synergistic effect as revealed by the isobologram: most of the data points
located below the line of additive effects (Fig. 1D). The
analysis reflected that NAC/AAP yielded a better protection than either drug
alone. Figure 1E showed a normalized isobologram for
various tested values in hADMSCs. The combination index (CI) curve shown in
Fig. 1E also demonstrated the synergistic protection
of NAC when combined with AAP, with CI values ranging from 0.679 to 1.96 at
various drug combinations. CI values that are < 1 in tested doses
indicating synergy, and tested doses show an improvement over single doses. The
combined treatment of 1mM NAC and 0.2mM AAP obtained the best score in DRI (Supplementary Table S1), however, the combination of 3mM NAC
and 0.2mM AAP reached the best score in CI (Fig. 1E).
NAC/AAP protected hADMSCs from H2O2-induced
apoptosis and necrosis
The nuclei of hADMSCs after various treatments were observed by live-cell
fluorescent microscopy after staining with Hoechst dye and PI. No abnormal cell
was found in the control group while a high number of cells displayed typical
apoptosis- (nuclear shrinkage, apoptotic bleb, and irregular shape) and
necrosis-like changes (cell swelling, plasma membrane rupture, and detachment;
minor population as compared to the apoptotic cells) were noted in
H2O2 treated cells (photomicrographs in Fig. 2A). Flow cytometric analysis (Fig. 2A
lower panel) also showed that PI+ cells were decreased in the
NAC/AAP treated cells subjected to H2O2 challenge. Among
them, the Annexin V+/PI+ cells were indicated as
the late apoptotic cells (NAC/AAP pretreated 11.81% vs. non-treated
32.54%). To evaluate whether NAC/AAP attenuated the cell death of hADMSCs by
reducing the ROS generation in the present study, the intracellular ROS level
was examined using DCFDA and DHE staining. Our data show that NAC/AAP protected
hADMSCs from oxidative stress injury, at least partially, by inhibiting the
intracellular ROS generation (Fig. S1).
Figure 2
NAC/AAP protected hADMSCs against H2O2-induced
apoptosis and necrosis.
A, upper panel: cells were stained with Hoechst 33258 (blue) and PI (red) for
live-cell imaging and monitoring. Blue arrowheads indicate necrotic cells;
yellow arrowheads indicate apoptotic and necrotic-like cells. To determine
whether NAC and/or AAP inhibition of H2O2-induced cell
death was associated with apoptosis and necrosis (A, lower panel),
Annexin-V/PI double-staining was used to detect the PS out-flipping
phenomenon and analysed by flow cytometry. (B) Whole cell lysates isolated
from hADMSCs of various treatments as indicated were analyzed for caspase-3
and -9, PARP, BAX, and BCL2 expressions. The protein expression levels were
normalized to b-actin and expressed as the fold change to the respective
control. Data are representative of 3 independent experiments. Scale bar =
100 µm. * p < 0.05 and ** p <
0.01 compared to the H2O2-treatment control.
The activation of caspases and expression of pro-apoptotic proteins were revealed
by immunoblotting (Fig. 2B). Besides increasing the
expression of the anti-apoptotic BCL2, NAC/AAP decreased the expressions of BAX,
cleaved caspase-9, -3, and PARP1. NAC/AAP also markedly decreased the ratio of
BAX/BCL2 protein ratio. These findings indicated that activation of caspase
cascade could be one of the mechanisms of
H2O2‐induced apoptosis and necrosis in
hADMSCs.
NAC/AAP suppressed mitochondrial dysfunction during
H2O2-induced cell death
Since caspase-9 and BAX were activated in H2O2-treated
hADMSCs, we further characterized its effect on mitochondrial membrane potential
(MMP), the localization of BAX, and the release of cytochrome c from
mitochondria to cytosol, respectively. In normally polarized mitochondria, JC-1
forms aggregates or monomers depending on the state of MMP. JC-1 forms
fluorescent red aggregates in the mitochondria of untreated hADMSCs with
polarized or higher MMP, while disperses into fluorescent green monomers in the
mitochondria with depolarized or lower MMP. After the pretreatment of NAC or/and
AAP, JC-1 gathered in the mitochondrial matrix and produced red fluorescence
(Fig. 3A, enlarged view). Further flow cytometric
analysis revealed that H2O2 resulted a dramatic reduction
of red fluorescence, indicating a loss of MMP and the damage of mitochondria in
hADMSCs (Fig. 3B). The ratio of red and green fluorescence
represented the level of depolarization in mitochondria: the NAC/AAP protected
hADMSCs against the damage caused by H2O2 treatment.
Figure 3
NAC/AAP protected mitochondria from H2O2-induced
apoptosis.
(A) The MMP was measured using JC-1 fluorescence imaging in hADMSCs. The JC-1
monomer was represented by green fluorescence, the JC-1 aggregate image was
represented by red fluorescence, and the merged images were the combined of
the green and red images. Control cells showed strong aggregated red
fluorescence indicative of normal membrane potential. Scale bar = 100 mm.
(B) Changes of MMP in NAC or/and AAP-pretreated hADMCS by flow cytometry.
Fluorescence intensity shifted from the higher level to the lower one
indicates the loss of MMP. Mitochondria depolarization is indicated by an
increase in the red fluorescence intensity ratio. Quantitative analysis of
the green/red fluorescence shows that the NAC and/or AAP decreased green
fluorescence, while NAC and/or AAP inhibited
H2O2-mediated mitochondrial permeability. (C) The
expression and localization of apoptosis related mitochondrial proteins.
Expression of BAX and cytochrome c proteins in hADMSCs pretreated
with NAC or/and AAP were assessed by western blot. COX-IV and a-tubulin were
used as mitochondrial and cytosolic internal controls, respectively. Summary
of normalized values of cytochrome c and BAX levels in the
mitochondrial and cytosolic fractions of hADMSCs were shown at the right.
(D) Immunostaining of BAX (left) and cytochrome c (right) using a
respective FITC-conjugated antibodies (green) and MitoTracker (red) as the
indicator of mitochondria in NAC or/and AAP-pretreated hADMSCs. Scale bar =
10 µm. * p < 0.05, ** p <
0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Mitochondrial dysfunction can provoke the release of cytochrome c from
mitochondria into cytosol. Western blot analysis revealed that exposure of
hADMSCs to H2O2 induced a significant increase in
cytosolic cytochrome c, accompanied by a decrease of cytochrome c
in the mitochondrial fraction (Fig. 3C). NAC or/and AAP
pretreatment also decreased BAX translocation to the mitochondrial membrane.
Translocation of BAX to the mitochondrial membrane has been shown to facilitate
the release of cytochrome c2324. In addition,
immunostaining also confirmed the cellular distribution of BAX and cytochrome
c (Fig. 3D). The mitochondria of hADMSCs were
primarily identified by MitoTracker, and later immunolabeled with
FITC-conjugated BAX (Fig. 3D, left panel) and cytochrome
c (Fig. 3D, right panel) antibodies,
respectively. NAC/AAP suppressed mitochondrial translocation of BAX and reduced
cytochrome c release from mitochondria to cytosol at the presence of
H2O2. These results confirmed the protective effect of
combined treatment of NAC and AAP in preventing mitochondrial dysfunction
associated with intrinsic apoptotic pathway.
NAC/AAP mediated atypical necrosis via AIF translocation in
H2O2-induced cell death
When hADMSCs were pretreated with the NAC or/and AAP before
H2O2 challenge, the activation of executioner, i.e.,
caspases, was significantly suppressed, and consequently decreasing the cleavage
of PARP1 (Fig. 2B). Instead of typical necrotic cell
morphology, some dying cells that swelled and showed a
“bubbled-like” nuclear morphology resembling apoptosis
were also observed (Fig. 2A, upper panel). In addition,
the flow cytometric analysis also revealed an Annexin
V+/PI+ cell population (Fig.
2A, lower panel). Programmed necrotic cell death or necroptosis is
characterized by plasma membrane rupture, permeable to PI, and depolarization of
mitochondrial membrane25. Approximately 10-20% of these Annexin
V+/PI+ cells induced by
H2O2 could be suppressed by NAC or/and AAP
pretreatment (Fig. 2A, lower panel). Loss of MMP is
associated with the opening of the mitochondrial transition pore, release of
inner mitochondrial components (e.g., apoptogenic proteins), and subsequently
apoptosis26. Recently it was reported that
caspase-independent necroptosis mediated by AIF could promote chromatinolysis,
which was associated with the phosphorylation on Ser139 of histone protein H2AX
(γH2AX)2728. We investigated whether the
translocation of AIF and phosphorylation and H2AX occurred in the
H2O2-induced necroptosis of hADMSCs. Immunoblotting
revealed that AIF mostly resided in the mitochondria of normal hADMSCs (Fig. 4A). AIF translocation occurred and subsequently
appeared in the nuclear fraction of hADMSCs treated with
H2O2 for 4 hr. NAC or/and AAP pretreatment
significantly decreased AIF levels in the nuclear fraction upon
H2O2 treatment. As shown in (Fig.
4B), H2O2 resulted in a significant increase of
AIF in the nucleus, while NAC/AAP pretreatment reduced
H2O2-induced AIF translocation to the nucleus. The
Ser139-H2AX in the whole cell lysate of hADMSCs could be induced by
H2O2, and was decreased upon NAC/AAP pretreatment
(Fig. 4A).
Figure 4
AIF/H2AX pathway was involved in the protective effect of NAC and
AAP.
(A) Expression of AIF and H2AX proteins in hADMSCs pretreated with NAC or/and
AAP were assessed by western blot. COX-IV and Histone were used as
mitochondrial and nuclear internal controls, respectively. The changes of
each band were expressed as fold-changes as compared to the internal
controls. (B) Analysis of fluorescence intensities by confocal microscopy
revealed the co-localization of AIF (green fluorescence) in the nuclei (red
fluorescence). In the enlarged pictures, the overlapping of the fluorescence
(yellow) decreased in NAC/AAP-treated cells. Histograms demonstrate the
fluorescence intensity profiles along the lines indicated in the upper row
images. (C) Mitochondrial membrane potential changes of hADMSCs treated with
NAC/AAP for 4 h in the absence or presence of Nec1 were analyzed by flow
cytometry after JC-1 staining. Quantitative analysis of the green
fluorescence (JC-1 monomer) showed that the NAC/AAP decreased green
fluorescence in the absence or presence of Nec1 (right panel). (D) The
expression of AIF protein in the mitochondrial fraction of hADMSCs
pretreated with or without NAC/AAP was assessed at the absence or presence
of Nec1 by western blot. COX-IV was used as mitochondrial internal control.
Summary of normalized values of AIF in the mitochondrial fractions of
hADMSCs.is shown at the right panel. (E) Mitochondrial ROS is shown in the
representative histogram of unfixed cells analyzed by flow cytometry after
MitoSOX staining. The values indicate the percentage of cells in the marked
(M1) regions. Scale bar = 10 µm. * p < 0.05, **
p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. ns, not
significant.
To investigate whether AIF pathway was involved in the
H2O2-induced necroptosis, we introduced Necrostatin 1
(Nec1), an necroptosis inhibitor that blocks RIPK1 activation25,
before the H2O2 treatment. The results showed that Nec1
alone had no effect on the mitochondrial AIF level. However, Nec1 treatment
decreased the mitochondrial AIF level to 0.44-fold in hADMSCs suffering from
H2O2 challenge (normalized against COX-IV), (Fig. 4D). Addition of NAC/AAP further enhanced the effect of
Nec1 on reducing mitochondrial AIF release after H2O2
treatment (0.86 fold of untreated control). Retaining of AIF, as well as the
mitochondrial function was further confirmed by JC-1 staining: NAC/AAP plus Nec1
pretreatment markedly increased the cell population with higher MMP after
H2O2 challenge (Fig. 4C).The mitochondrial ROS generation was also analyzed with MitoSOX to address the
role of NAC/AAP pretreatment in H2O2-induced necrotopsis
(Fig. 4E). Cells under H2O2
treatment showed higher red fluorescence as compared with that in the normal
control group (27.9% vs. 12.5%). The fluorescence intensity was lower in
the NAC/AAP pretreated cells (17.7%), while Nec1 treatment did not reduce the
mitochondrial ROS production (28.3%). More remarkably, the Nec1 and NAC/AAP
co-treatment totally suppressed the mitochondrial ROS production (12.3%).
NAC/AAP inhibited the formation of necrosome in
H2O2-induced cell death.
To further delineate the protective mechanism of NAC/AAP in suppressing
H2O2-induced necroptosis and apoptosis, we tested the
effect of the RIPK1 inhibitor (Nec1) and pan-caspase inhibitor (z-VAD) on these
H2O2-treated hADMSCs. Previous studies have shown that
Annexin V and PI staining can be used to assess different cell deaths: Annexin
V+/PI- cells were regarded as early apoptotic
cells, and double positive cells were regarded as late apoptotic or necroptotic
cells29. Apoptosis and necroptosis are mediated by distinct
but overlapping pathways involving cell surface death receptors and cellular
components30. Different types of cell death were classified
in cytometric analysis according to Annexin V and PI staining pattern (Fig. 5A): the Annexin V+/PI-
cells were early apoptotic cells (green region), the Annexin
V+/PI- cells were necroptoptic cells (Nec1
sensitive cells in the red region), and double positive cells represented cells
that underwent both apoptosis and necroptosis (yellow region). The results
demonstrated that NAC/AAP partially inhibited H2O2-induced
necroptosis in hADMSCs (Fig. 5A, 35.4% reduction).
Addition of Nec1 almost completely blocked H2O2-induced
necroptosis in hADMSCs with or without NAC/AAP pretreatment (21.4% and 18.7%
reduction, respectively). However, Nec1 did not inhibit early apoptosis (5.4%
vs. 14.7%). NAC/AAP inhibited apoptosis in
H2O2-treated hADMSCs (14.5% reduction), however it did not
augment the effect of z-VAD which would inhibit caspases activation during
apoptosis (3.9% vs. 5.7%). When both Nec1 and z-VAD were incubated with
hADMSCs prior to H2O2, all types of cell death were mostly
suppressed. Interestingly Nec1 plus z-VAD, together with NAC/AAP, almost
completely abolished the H2O2-induced necroptosis and
apoptosis cell death (Fig. 5A). Co-treatment of NAC/AAP
significantly increased cell viability from 56.3%
(H2O2-treated group) to 75.9% (NAC/AAP-treated group),
while in combined with Nec1 and z-VAD increased cell survival from 75.9%
(NAC/AAP-treated group) to 86.9% (Nec1+z-VAD+NAC/AAP group) (Fig.
5B). Previous studies showed that the interference of RIPK1, RIPK3,
and MLKL could block the assembly of the necrosome, and hence the necroptosis
that led to cellular swelling and plasma membrane rupture25. To
further elucidate the mechanism of necroptosis in
H2O2-induced cell death, we analyzed the assembly of
necrosome under various treatments by immuno-precipitation. The results showed
that H2O2 treatment significantly increased the formation
of necrosome as revealed by the increase of RIPK1 and RIPK3 in
MLKL-immunoprecipitate (Fig. 5C). Taken together, these
findings suggested that NAC/AAP inhibited the formation of necrosome in
H2O2-induced necroptosis in hADMSCs.
Figure 5
NAC/AAP attenuated necroptosis at the presence of caspase and RIPK1
inhibitors.
(A) hADMSCs were treated with NAC/AAP at the presence or absence of Nec1 (100
mM) and z-VAD (50 mM) for 120 min following by H2O2
treatment. Cells stained with Annexin V-FITC and PI were analyzed by flow
cytometry. The values indicate the percentage of cells in each region were
summarized at the lower panel. (B) The survival of hADMSCs with NAC/AAP
pretreatment at the presence or absence of Nec1 and z-VAD following by
H2O2 treatment. (C) hADMSCs were treated with NAC
or/and AAP followed by H2O2 stimulation. MLKL was
immuneprecipitated and immunoblotted. * p < 0.05, **
p < 0.01.
NAC/AAP attenuated mitochondrial dysfunction and restored mitochondrial
morphology during H2O2 treatment
To assess whether NAC/AAP treatment was sufficient to protect mitochondria from
H2O2-induced damage, we analyzed the mitochondrial
network using confocal microscopy. After visualizing the mitochondria with
fluorescent MitoTracker Red, we found that mitochondrial fragmentation was
markedly increased after H2O2 treatment (Fig. 6A). Notably, pretreatment of NAC/AAP efficiently inhibited the
increase of mitochondrial fragmentation caused by H2O2. We
further classified the mitochondrial morphological changes with MicroP
software31. The mitochondria were classified into three types
according to the characteristics of its morphology (Fig.
6B): small globular (Type 1), linear tubular (Type 2), and
branched/twisted tubular, swollen globular or loops (Type 3). Our data showed
that NAC/AAP-pretreated hADMSCs displayed a significantly higher percentage of
types 2 and 3 mitochondria than the non-pretreated cells (Fig.
6C). In addition, after the H2O2 insult, the
average length and width of the mitochondria in NAC/AAP-pretreated cells
significantly outscored those without pretreatment (Fig.
6D). To investigate whether the protection of NAC/AAP on mitochondria
was related to the duration of H2O2 exposure, we treated
cells with H2O2 for different time periods and then
stained mitochondria with MitoTracker. We observed that cells treated with both
NAC/AAP had 96% protection in maintaining the mitochondrial mass at 2- and 4 hr,
respectively, after H2O2 exposure (Fig. 6E
& 6F). These results suggested that NAC/AAP reduced
mitochondrial fission and helped maintaining their mass.
Figure 6
NAC/AAP protected mitochondria against oxidative stress.
(A) hADMSCs were stained with MitoTracker Red and observed by confocol
microscopy to analyze the mitochondrial network structure. The acquired
images were filtered, and thresholded to identify mitochondrial fragments
using ImageJ software. The particle number was normalized to the total
mitochondrial area to calculate the MFC (mitochondria fragmentation
counting). The ratio changes are shown at the right panel. (B) MicroP
software classifies mitochondria in each cell into three categories
according to the features of mitochondrial morphology. (C and D) The
proportions of different categories of mitochondria obtained from various
treatments are shown in (C), and the changes in length and width of the
mitochondria are shown in (D). The effects of NAC or/and AAP protection on
mitochondrial mass are shown in E: hADMSCs of various treatments were
stained with MitoTracker Red, and their mitochondrial mass were measured by
flow cytometry at different time points (F). The data were expressed as a
percentage to the non-treated control, which was set at 100%. Scale bar = 10
µm. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01,
*** p < 0.001. ns, not significant.
NAC/AAP reduced mitochondrial fission via regulating Drp1 translocation
during H2O2 treatment
Recruitment and/or retention of Drp1 in the mitochondria have been implicated in
mitochondrial fission and mitopotsis3233. We further explored
the possible mechanism of how NAC/AAP reduced mitochondrial fission by
monitoring Drp1 phosphorylation. Using an antibody specifically recognizing
phosphorylated Drp1 at Ser616 (Drp1 S616), we showed that the level of Drp1 S616
was decreased, as well as its translocation to mitochondria by NAC/AAP
pretreatment (Fig. 7A, upper panel). It was found that,
under H2O2 treatment, Drp1 S616 showed punctate
distribution within the mitochondrial networks. NAC/AAP pretreatment reduced 1/3
of Drp1 S616 translocation as revealed by the decreased of Drp1 S616 staining
over the mitochondria (i.e., FITC fluorescence/MitoTracker, Fig.
7A, lower panel).
Figure 7
NAC/AAP decreased the activation of Drp1 in
H2O2-treated hADMSCs.
(A) The co-localization of Drp1 Ser616 (green) in the mitochondria
(MitoTracker, red) was revealed by confocal microscopy. The merged images
clearly show the recruitment of Drp1 Ser616 to mitochondria in response to
H2O2 treatment. NAC/AAP pretreatment partially
prevented mitochondrial translocation of Drp1 S616 induced by
H2O2 in a time-dependent manner. The fluorescence
data were quantified by ImageJ software. Quantification data were obtained
from at least five independent experiments (lower panel). (B) Western blot
analysis was employed to study the translocation of Drp1 to mitochondria in
response to H2O2 treatment. The protein levels of Drp1
were decreased by Nec1 pre-incubation. Long exposure revealed ~160 and ~300
kDa bands in the mitochondrial fraction. Scale bar = 10 µm.
The polymerization of Drp1 could cause mitochondrial fragmentation, an early and
obligatory step for necroptosis execution. As shown in Figure
7B, western blot analysis revealed that exposure of hADMSCs to
H2O2 induced an increase in mitochondrial Drp1 levels,
accompanied by a parallel increase of high molecular weight Drp1 reactive bands
(i.e., the Drp1 dimer and tetramer) in the longer exposure image. These findings
indicated that NAC/AAP suppressed Drp1-mediated mitochondrial fission.
Discussion
The rationale for using combination treatment with NAC and vitamin C to
prevent cell death and injury of tissues due to oxidative stress is largely based on
in vitro observations. This may be particularly relevant in preventing cell death
and injury due to H2O2 exposure. However, vitamin C is in fact
an important ingredient of the osteogenic differentiation medium, and has been
reported to increase cell proliferation and differentiation of BMMSCs into
osteocytes and adipocytes34. Langenbach and Handschel reviewed and
concluded that vitamin C could lead to the increased secretion of collagen type I
(Col1), which in turn upregulated Col1/α2β1 integrin-mediated
intracellular signaling. Activation of the Col1/α2β1 signaling
pathway facilitates the osteogenic process that is initiated by dexamethasone35. Cao et al. also demonstrated that vitamin C enhanced the
cardiac differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells via promoting the
proliferation of cardiac progenitor cells3436. Previous reports
have also shown the addition of other antioxidants, such as
epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), curcumin, melatonin and β-estradiol,
can reduce cellular oxidative stress and promote the proliferation of MSCs373839.We previously showed that addition of NAC/AAP could modulate the cell cycle
progression of hADMSCs by downregulating CDK inhibitors: at the presence of NAC/AAP,
cells proliferated more rapidly, yet retained their stemness and their
differentiation ability21. Interestingly, the NAC/AAP-induced changes
in hADMSCs were quite similar to those cultivated under hypoxia (1%–5%
pO2)22, suggesting that NAC/AAP might activate similar
biochemical pathways that lead to cell survival. Taken together, these observations
led to the hypothesis that combination treatment of vitamin C with ROS
inhibitor (i.e., NAC) enhances free radical scavenging, and might protect them from
the adverse effects of excessive oxidative stress.In this study, we first identified the proper combination of NAC and AAP (3 mM and
0.2mM, respectively) that exerted maximum protection on hADMSCs that were under
H2O2-induced oxidative stress (Supplementary
Table S1 & Fig. 1E). The NAC/AAP-treated
cells have less mitochondrial ROS (Figs. 4E), which we believe
is beneficial to mitochondrial function (Figs. 3A &
3B) and integrity (Fig. 6). Mitochondrial
morphology is tightly controlled by the balance between mitochondrial fission and
fusion14. Our data demonstrated that NAC/AAP reduced
mitochondrial fragmentation as characterized by decreased fission, increased fusion,
or both. In support of this point, we demonstrated that the types of mitochondria in
the NAC/AAP-treated cells were nearly the same as we observed in the control group
(Fig. 6B). At the molecular level,
H2O2 treatment also resulted in Drp1 phosphorylation and
translocation to mitochondria, while NAC/AAP pretreatment significantly reduced both
changes (Fig. 7).Stabilization of mitochondrial function by NAC/AAP pretreatment was revealed by the
JC-1 staining (Fig.3A & 3B). It is known that
mitochondria MMP plays diverse roles in cell physiology and pathology including
regulations of necroptosis and mitoptosis4041. The inhibition of
mitochondrial MMP depolarization in hADMSCs may prevent the breakdown of
mitochondrial integrity thus restrict the activation of internal
mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis and the release of other cell death factors (e.g.,
cytochrome c, AIF, etc.).Mitoptosis is defined as a form of mitochondrial programmed cell death (PCD). It
could be associated with both necrosis and apoptosis, although regressing
mitochondria are also found in autophagic vacuoles42. In our study,
NAC/AAP inactivated RIPK1 and RIPK3 that led to the reduction of
H2O2-induced necroptosis (Fig. 5).
In addition, NAC/AAP reversed H2O2-induced mitoptosis and
necroptosis in hADMSCs, and Nec1 pre-incubation decreased the expression of Drp1
protein induced by H2O2 treatment. The data suggest that
NAC/AAP may directly or indirectly affect necroptosis through mitochondrial fission
in hADMSCs. Moreover, our data demonstrate for the first time both mitoptosis and
necroptosis pathways contribute to the protection effect of NAC/AAP on hADMSCs under
H2O2.Mitochondrion is well known for its function in PCD and is also involved in the
down-stream regulation of PARP143. PARP1 has been implicated in two
modes of cell death induced by DNA damage, namely apoptosis and necroptosis44. Typically, PARP1 can be activated by DNA breaks, cellular
stresses45, and the posttranslational modifications such as
phosphorylation, acetylation or PARylation46. The PARylation of
proteins is thought to exhaust cells’ ATP and NAD that subsequently leads
to necroptosis, and PARPs also induce AIF release from mitochondria to nuclei47. A role for AIF in the permeabilization of mitochondrial membranes
and the translocation of cytotoxic proteins has been proposed in necroptosis28. Besides the activation of PARP1 and BCL2 family, the apoptogenic
form of AIF is associated with Ser139-H2AX phosphorylation272848.
Our result demonstrated that NAC/AAP pretreatment reduced the phosphorylation of
H2AX (Fig. 4A). Notably, a single pretreatment of hADMSCs with
AAP was sufficient to preclude AIF nuclear translocation (Fig.
4A). Two signal transducers of DNA damage, namely PARP1 and H2AX, are
both involved in the regulation of necroptosis: they are both activated in response
to DNA damage and are implicated in PCD4950.With regard to the direct inhibitory effect on cells, our data showed that NAC/AAP
could inhibit the translocation of BAX (Figs. 3C &
3D) and Drp1 (Fig. 8) to the mitochondria. It has
been shown that other key molecular mediators including cytochrome c, AIF,
Drp1, and RIPKs also promote necroptosis by activating multiple signal pathways
(Fig. 8). RIPK1 and RIPK3 can act as lethal effectors in
necroptosis: mixed lineage kinase domain-likeprotein (MLKL), phosphoglycerate mutase
family member 5 (PGAM5), and the fission mediator Drp15152. Indeed,
we confirmed that NAC/AAP elicited the activation of multiple mitoptotic signal
cascades, such as Drp1/BAX/caspase-dependent and Drp1/BAX/caspase-independent
pathways. Our data showed that NAC/AAP decreases necroptosis without the induction
of ROS generation (Fig. 4E), indicating that combined therapy
may directly or indirectly regulate multiple signal transduction pathways.
Figure 8
Scheme illustration of how NAC and AAP protect mitochondria against oxidative
damage in hADMSC, and subsequently rescue the cell from necroptosis and
apoptosis.
Both NAC and AAP protect cells from oxidative stress-induced cell death via
inhibiting mitoptosis and necroptosis in hADMSCs. NAC/AAP suppress
necroptosis via decreasing the translocation of AIF, and thus stopping the
formation of necrosome. Stabilization of mitochondrial integrity prevents
the secretion of apoptotic factors that are resided in the mitochondria.
Conclusion
The synergistic protective mechanism of NAC/AAP to suppress
H2O2-induced necroptosis, mitoptosis, and apoptosis in
hADMSCs is illustrated in (Fig. 8). Our results demonstrate
that NAC/AAP diminish BAX and Drp1 translocation from cytoplasm to mitochondria, and
jointly contribute to mitochondrial integrity. Maintenance of mitochondrial function
is accompanied with decrease of ROS production and thereby protects hADMSCs from
mitoptosis. As mitochondria are protected in hADMSCs after treating with NAC/AAP,
down-regulation of AIF, H2AX, and PARP1 occur, and may subsequently activate genes
that are involved in the synthesis and repair of DNA. However, enhanced
proliferation through inhibition of necroptotic can also be another possible
mechanism to explain the synergistic effects of NAC/AAP.
Methods
Isolation and maintenance of hADMSCs
This study was approved by the Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital Institutional
Review Board (IRB102-130): hADMSCs were isolated from the human adipose tissue
left over using our previously published method21. The hADMSCs
were cultured in MSC maintenance medium containing Iscove’s modified
Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM), 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS,
MSC-Qualified), 0.1 M sodium bicarbonate, 2 mM L‐glutamine (all from
GIBCO-Invitrogen Co., CA, USA) and 10ng/mL FGF-2 (R&D Systems, MN,
USA) at 37°C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2
and 95% air. All experiments were performed on hADMSCs from passage 3 to 6.
Ethics statement
The institutional review board at Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital approved all
study procedures. The study was performed in accordance with approved
guidelines. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient and/or
guardians. The study was carried out in compliance with the Helsinki
Declaration.
Cell treatment
The cells cultured in complete medium were used as the normal control. For NAC
and AAP (all purchased from Sigma Co., MO, USA) co-treatment experiment, the
hADMSCs were pretreated with various concentrations of NAC or AAP for 20 h and
followed by incubation in medium containing 0.5mM H2O2
(Sigma Co., MO, USA) for 4h (Figs. 1A & 1B).
The concentrations that exert maximum protection were combined and further
tested for their protection effect. For inhibitor studies, the cells were
incubated with indicated amount of NAC or/and AAP for 20 h, and subsequently 2 h
with medium containing a receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1)
inhibitor, necrostatin-1 (Nec-1, 0.1mM, ab141053; Abcam, MA, USA) or/and a
pan-caspase inhibitor z-VAD-FMK (0.01 mM, ab120382; Abcam, MA, USA) prior to the
final 0.5 mM H2O2 challenge.
Cell proliferation assay
Cell proliferation was measured for cells growth in 96-well plates by using
Alamar Blue (AbD Serotec, Oxford, UK), an oxidation-reduction indicator. The
absorbance of Alamar Blue is correlated with cell number. Briefly, 10% of Alamar
Blue was added to the seeded cells for 4 h. The absorbance of this reaction was
read at 570 and 600nm in a multi-well plate ELISA reader (Bio-Tek Instruments,
VT, USA). Cell proliferation (% of untreated control) was calculated with the
following equation:Proliferation (%) = [(117216×OD570
(sample)-80586×OD600 (sample)] /
[(117216×OD570 (control)-80586×OD600
(control)]×100%; 117216 and 80586 are the molar extinction
coefficients of reduced- and oxidized- Alamar Blue, respectively.
Calculation of combination index and dose reduction index
The Chou-Talalay method has been used in drug combination studies and it can
provide an estimation of drug synergistic effect by calculating the combination
index (CI): CI < 1 indicates synergistic effect, CI = 1 indicates
additive effect, and CI > 1 indicates antagonism. The CI is
calculated as: CI =
(D)1/(Dx)1+(D)2/(Dx)2,
where (Dx)1 and (Dx)2 indicate the mono
protection doses of NAC and AAP, respectively; while (D)1 and
(D)2 are the doses of NAC and AAP that can cause the
similar protection effect in combination. The dose reduction index (DRI) is
defined by the level of dose reduction that is possible in a combination for a
given level of effect as compared with the concentration of individual drug
alone. The equation of the DRI can be shown as: (DRI)1 =
(Dx)1/(D)1 and (DRI)2 =
(Dx)2/(D)253.
Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining
Apoptotic cell death was measured by Alexa Fluor Annexin V/Dead Cell Apoptosis
kit (Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, OR, USA) according to the
manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were harvested after various
treatments, washed twice with cold binding buffer, resuspended in binding buffer
and stained with 5 mL of Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI) in dark for 15
min at room temperature. After incubation, 1 mL binding buffer was added, and
cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, BD Bioscience, CA, USA).
Cell viability assay
Cell viability was analyzed using CCK-8 (Cell Counting Kit-8, Enzo Life Sciences
Inc., NY, USA) that detected the metabolic activity of viable cells. Cells were
plated at a density of 2×103 cells/well in 96-well
plates with the complete medium. At the end of various treatments, 10
μL of the CCK-8 reagent was added to each well and incubated at
37°C for 4 h. Absorbance was recorded by an ELISA microplate reader
at 450nm.
Cellular production of ROS
Intracellular ROS (composed mainly of hydrogen peroxide and superoxide anion) was
measured using Total ROS/Superoxide Detection Kit (Enzo Life Sciences Inc., NY,
USA). After incubation with H2O2 for indicated times,
cells were stained with the detection reagent at 37°C for 30 min. ROS
production of hADMSC cells was analyzed by fluorescence microscopy (Carl Zeiss
Axiovert M200, Jena, Germany) and flow cytometry, respectively.
Mitochondrial membrane potential, ROS and mass measurement
Cells were harvested after various treatments, washed twice with PBS, resuspended
in culture medium and stained with JC-1 reagent (10mg/mL), MitoSOX reagent (5mM)
and MitoTracker Green FM or MitoTracker Red CMXRos (50nM) (all from Molecular
Probes Inc., Eugene, OR, USA) at 37°C for 30 min. After incubation,
1mL PBS was added, and cells were analyzed by flow cytometry.
Subcellular fractionation, protein extraction, immunoprecipitation, and
immunoblotting
Cytosolic, nuclear, and mitochondrial fractions of the cells were isolated with
NE-PER Nuclear & Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents
and Mitochondria Isolation Kit (both from Thermo Scientific, MA, USA),
respectively, according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. Cells
from various treatments were lysed with RIPA buffer (Millipore Co., MA, USA) and
sonicated on ice for 5 min. After centrifugation at 13,000 x g for 15 min
at 4°C, the supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube and the
resulting protein concentration was determined by Bradford protein assay
(Protech Inc., Taipei, Taiwan) with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the standard.
For immunoprecipitation study, total protein (0.2mg) was incubated with
anti-mixed lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL, Millipore Co., MA, USA) antibody at
4°C overnight. Then, 100µL of pre-cleared protein G-Beads
(Millipore Co., MA, USA) was added and incubated at 4°C for 2 h. The
resulting immunoprecipitate was boiled with SDS reducing sample buffer and
subjected to SDS-PAGE. After electrophoresis, protein was blotted onto a PVDF
membrane (Millipore Co., MA, USA) and blocked with skim milk at room temperature
for 1 h. Each membrane was incubated with appropriate primary antibodies at
4°C overnight. The blots were incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary
antibodies for 1 h, washed 3 times with PBST (PBS containing 0.1%Tween-20),
visualized by Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (Millipore Co.,
MA, USA), and images recorded with the Keta Luminescent image analyzer (Wealtec
Bioscience Co., Taipei, Taiwan).
Cell morphology examination
Cell morphology was examined by Hoechst 33258 and PI double staining for
live-cell imaging. After various treatments, cells were stained with Hoechst
33258 and PI solution at room temperature for 10 min. Cells were washed twice
with PBS and observed with inverted fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss Axiovert
M200).
Immunofluorescence labeling
Cells were washed with PBS and incubated with 50nM MitoTracker Red CMXRos at
37°C for 30 min. To determine the subcellular localization of BAX,
cytochrome c and phosphorylated-Drp-1 at Ser616 (Drp-1 S616), cells were
washed twice with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS and subsequently
permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 on ice for 5 min. After washing with PBS
twice, cells were incubated in blocking solution (PBS containing 20% goat serum)
at room temperature for 30 min and incubated with primary antibodies at
4°C overnight. After washing with PBS, the cells were then stained
with FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:250, Code 711-545-152, Jackson
ImmunoResearch Lab, Inc., PA, USA), counterstained with Hoechst 33258 for 5 min,
and visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy (LSM510 Meta, Carl Zeiss,
Jena, Germany).
Antibodies and Inhibitors
Anti-PARP1 (100573), anti-BAX (109683), anti-BCL2 (100064), anti-cytochrome c
(108585), anti-COX-IV (101499), anti-a-tubulin (112141), anti-RIPK1 (111074),
anti-RIPK3 (107574), and anti-histone H3 (122148) were purchased from GeneTex
(ICON-Genetex Inc., Taipei, Taiwan); Anti-caspase-9 (ab115161) and
anti-caspase-3 (ab90437) were purchased from Abcam. Anti-MLKL (MACB604) was
purchased from Millipore. Anti-AIF (#4642), anti-Drp1 (#5391), anti-Drp1Ser616
(#3455) and anti-phospho-H2AX (Ser139) (#9718) were purchased from Cell
Signaling Technology (MA, USA). Anti-b-actin (A5411) was purchased from
Sigma.
Statistical analysis
The intensity of bands in Western blots or fluorescent images were quantified by
using AlphaDigiDoc (Cell Biosciences, ON, Canada), ImageJ (NIH), or MicroP
software31. The intensity values were normalized against the
intensity of the loading control for the same sample. The values after
normalizing to loading control in the control groups were set as 1.0. All values
were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) and were
analyzed using a Student’s t-test with two-tailed distribution
between groups as indicated in the graphs. All calculations were performed by
Microsoft Excel 2010.
Author Contributions
C.J.L. performed experiments, data analysis and wrote the manuscript. L.Y.S. provided
conceptual input. C.Y.P. designed the experiments, supervised the research and
revised manuscripts. All authors reviewed the final version of the manuscript.
Authors: Irina Lonskaya; Vladimir N Potaman; Luda S Shlyakhtenko; Elena A Oussatcheva; Yuri L Lyubchenko; Viatcheslav A Soldatenkov Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2005-02-28 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: M Baritaud; L Cabon; L Delavallée; P Galán-Malo; M-E Gilles; M-N Brunelle-Navas; S A Susin Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 8.469
Authors: Phuc Van Pham; Nga Yen Tran; Nhan Lu-Chinh Phan; Ngoc Bich Vu; Ngoc Kim Phan Journal: In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 2.416
Authors: Ashok Joseph Theruvath; Elhussein Elbadry Mahmoud; Wei Wu; Hossein Nejadnik; Louise Kiru; Tie Liang; Stephen Felt; Heike Elisabeth Daldrup-Link Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Nils H Nicolay; Alexander Rühle; Ramon Lopez Perez; Thuy Trinh; Sonevisay Sisombath; Klaus-Josef Weber; Anthony D Ho; Jürgen Debus; Rainer Saffrich; Peter E Huber Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-05-24 Impact factor: 4.379