Literature DB >> 25908803

Scientific publishing. NIH's peer review stands up to scrutiny.

Jeffrey Mervis.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 25908803     DOI： 10.1126/science.348.6233.384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN： 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Future of fundamental discovery in US biomedical research.

Authors:  Michael Levitt; Jonathan M Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Predicting Productivity Returns on Investment: Thirty Years of Peer Review, Grant Funding, and Publication of Highly Cited Papers at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Authors:  Michael S Lauer; Narasimhan S Danthi; Jonathan Kaltman; Colin Wu
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity.

Authors:  Ferric C Fang; Anthony Bowen; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 8.140
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.